Monkey Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Could they work well in a CB deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 Could they work well in a CB deck? Not sure... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted July 26, 2010 Report Share Posted July 26, 2010 No, they couldn't. These take a Tribute to Normal Summon, and a Tributed Crystal Beast doesn't go to the s/t zone. Then, to use their effects, they need to drain the s/t zone even further, even though the whole point of Crystal Beasts is to try to fill the s/t zone, making these guys contradictory to the Crystal Beast win conditions of Abundance and Carbuncle. Compare more efficient methods of removal, like Breaker and Monarchs. If you insist on throwing some Continuous Spell-supported Dragons into Crystal Beasts, use Dweller in the Depths instead. Sure, it's still not good and it's just a beatstick, but at least it doesn't take a Tribute or drain the s/t zone, and Crystal Beasts are rather lacking in beatsticks, so at least it provides some benefit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Just about all of the Continuous Spell support is awful. Of them all, Gem Flash Energy is probably the best, and it's horrible. So, no. By the way, you may have heard of this one monster called Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder. He has very high ATK and one okay effect and he is halfway decent in Crystal Beasts. But he goes against Abundance, therefore he's awful. See? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 We would need an Arms Hole for Continuous Spell Cards to have things revolving around them see play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 I think the only real "good" aspect to these is that they aren't limited to "one per turn".......Though I'm tempted to troll Wc10's wifi with a deck that runs Gravi-Crush, because Gravi-Crush's artwork is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Both of their art is awesome. Yet wasted. I'm sad. *cuddles with Arm* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 If you want dragons in your CB deck then run Bad End Queen Dragon, or Koumori... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 If you want dragons in your CB deck then run Bad End Queen Dragon, or Koumori....................................... HOPELESS CRYSTALS!I'm tempted to build that now, regardless of how inconsistant it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Terrible in Crystal Beasts and terrible as cards. There's better one Tribute Beatsticks that are Dragon Type and better one Tribute Beatsticks period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 They need a Fusion NAO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 They need a Fusion NAO. Gravi Slash Dragon ******** Dragon/Fusion/Effect Gravi-Crush dragon + Magna- Slash Dragon This card can only be Fusion summoned by removing from play Gravi-Crush Dragon and Magna-Slash Dragon on your side of the field. (You do not need to use Polymerization.) Once per turn, you can destroy a face up Continuous Spell card you control to destroy a card on the field. When this card is removed from the field, you can add a Continuous Spell card from your deck or graveyard to your hand. Something liek that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DroutTrigger Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Magna-Slash Dagon is a bit better only for the reason that you get to choose to destroy one spell or trap card on the field instead of Gravi-Crush Dragon which destroy one monster on the field and thats pretty much it. now using any of the 2 for the CB i don't think it would be any good of use, heck i think your better of using Dragon Queen of Tragic Endings( i think) and thats saying to much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Gravi Slash Dragon ******** Dragon/Fusion/Effect Gravi-Crush dragon + Magna- Slash Dragon This card can only be Fusion summoned by removing from play Gravi-Crush Dragon and Magna-Slash Dragon on your side of the field. (You do not need to use Polymerization.) Once per turn, you can destroy a face up Continuous Spell card you control to destroy a card on the field. When this card is removed from the field, you can add a Continuous Spell card from your deck or graveyard to your hand. Something liek that?Nonononono. Gravi Slash Dragon Dragon/Fusion/Effect Gravi-Crush Dragon + Magna-Slash Dragon LV 8 3000/1800 This card can only be Fusion Summoned by removing from play the above monsters from your hand or field (You do not need to use Polymerization). Once per turn, you can destroy a face up Continuous Spell card you control to destroy 1 card on the field. You can destroy 1 Continuous Spell card you control to negate the activation of a Spell/Trap card and destroy it. Each time this card inflicts Battle Damage to your opponent, you can select 1 Continuous Spell Card in your Graveyard and add it to your hand. Trololololol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.