Zauls Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 this list is terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote]TT is balanced at 3? Are you 3 years of age!? The overextension argument is flawed, because it can be used even when your opponent has not overextended.[/quote] In which case, it's just simple 1-for-1 removal (or a -1 if you happen to have something on the field). Do you have problems with simple 1-for-1 removal? [quote]It can be used to stop any key summon, as well as a swarms, and also destroys face-downs.[/quote] Key Summons: If a deck is reliant on only one card to win and will automatically lose if that card is not summoned, then that deck deserves to lose. Swarms: Good. Face downs: So? [quote name='♥ ЅϯᵲåώӀӞ℮ᴙʀɣ−ɴɨɨ−ƈħåɴ ♥' timestamp='1283103126' post='4578537'] [center][color="#9932CC"][b]You do know that Torrential and Mirror Force won't be banned, right?[/b][/color][/center] [/quote] You do know this is a fictional list of stuff this guy wants to happen, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 sounds like somebody complaining about cards they lost against. Learn how to make a list. Actually, it sounds also like someone complaining about cards THEY DONT HAVE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='Darkest Hour' timestamp='1283118677' post='4579581'] sounds like somebody complaining about cards they lost against. [/quote] Derp, someone make a 2145 list, including a bunch of stupid cards/ones that dont exist yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1283118793' post='4579592'] Derp, someone make a 2145 list, including a bunch of stupid cards/ones that dont exist yet [/quote] They will probably make a Chaos Emperor Dragon synchro by then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='Superdoopertrooper' timestamp='1283086749' post='4577801'] [b][u]Forbidden:[/u][/b] - Dark Hole (from limited) [b]Probably.[/b] - Monster Reborn (from limited) [b]Probably.[/b] - Cold Wave (from limited) [b]Maybe, but we'll have to see how it does this format.[/b] - Future Fusion (from limited) [b]Eh, I doubt it. Cards rarely get randomly banned, and Future Fusion doesn't seem to perform exceptionally well to merit banning.[/b] - Rekindling (new) [b]Straight to a ban? I doubt it. Limiting maybe first.[/b] - Torrential Tribute (from limited) [b]...I hope not. It's not bannable.[/b] - Mirror Force (from limited) [b]Mirror Force has been unbanned for years and as far as I can tell, Konami knows that having one Mirror Force is extremely good for the game. It should not be banned[/b] - Return from the Different Dimension (from limited) [b]Hm? Why? Macro/Removal decks aren't that big at the moment, so I don't see this being an issue enough to ban it.[/b] - Call of the Haunted (from limited) [b]Ban Call AND Reborn? I doubt it. They unbanned them one at a time and I don't see both of them needing to get hit.[/b] - Morphing Jar (from limited) [b]Possible, but very unlikely.[/b] [b][u]Limited:[/u][/b] - Judgment Dragon (from semi-limited) [b]This card deserves banning, but Lightsworn must not be very popular because another banlist has left it alone. I can see this happening.[/b] [b][u]Semi-Limited:[/u][/b] - Infernity Launcher (from limited) [b]God, I hope not. Launcher is broken. It should either be banned or stay limited. No need to add a second to the game now.[/b] - Infernity Barrier (new) [b]This is stupid. Why Semi? If it's a problem (which it's not), it'll get limited, not semi-ed.[/b] - Black Whirlwind (from limited) [b]Isn't this a step backwards?[/b] - Charge of the Light Brigade (from limited) [b]Again, I ask: Why semi?[/b] - Lumina, Lightsworn Summoner (from limited) [b]I don't know about that...[/b] - Mezuki (from limited) [b]Possible, but not a good idea.[/b] - Infernity Archfiend (new) [b]Not limited? Why semi-ed? If it's a problem at 3, but not bad enough to be limited, the card is usually left alone. Launcher is the bigger problem, and 2 Archfiend instead of 3 won't diminish the problem if Launcher is put at 2.[/b] [b][u]No Longer On List:[/u][/b] - Gold Sarcophagus (from semi-limited) [b]Okay.[/b] - Magical Stone Excavation (from semi-limited) [b]Okay[/b] - Chain Strike (from semi-limited) [b]Chain Burn does not need the consistency.[/b] - Bottomless Trap Hole (from semi-limited) [b]Okay.[/b] - Mind Crush (from limited) [b]Er...I don't think so. Mind Crush is still a powerful card that should not be allowed in multiples. Least of all bumped to 3.[/b] - Ultimate Offering (from semi-limited) [b]Okay.[/b] - The Transmigration Prophecy (from limited) [b]I dont see this being a problem.[/b] - Snipe Hunter (from semi-limited) [b]Possible.[/b] - Demise, King of Armageddon (from semi-limited) [b]I don't like it. We dont need the Demise OTK format again.[/b] - Necro Gardna (from limited) [b]Not sure either way.[/b] - Tsukuyomi (from forbidden) [b]NO! Tsukyomi is too abusable, putting it at 3 would be stupid.[/b] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 I'm still confused on why Tsukuyomi is banned in the first place, besides being able to recycle Flip Monsters. Is there some looming OTK im missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Mac Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 Lol 7 month early list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 [quote name='Superdoopertrooper' timestamp='1283089364' post='4577896'] - Future Fusion (from limited) [b]lolwut?[/b] You clearly dont know the combos this card can pull off. [/quote] To bad the combos use other broken cards that are still broken with out without this. Also, you don't keep broken cards around, it's that simple. If a deck dies because they don't have a broken card they should be all means die. Hell, in a good format BW and LS won't need BWW and JD, they will still be perfectly playable. And just because a broken card isn't seeing play doesn't make it any less broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 [quote name='Darkest Hour' timestamp='1283126062' post='4580054'] I'm still confused on why Tsukuyomi is banned in the first place, besides being able to recycle Flip Monsters. Is there some looming OTK im missing? [/quote] Not everything banned is because of OTK or FTKs. Believe it or not, some cards are just abuseable or broken in their own right. Tsukyomi was banned alongside Time Seal. It comboed with Mask of Darkness and Time Seal/Drop Off. It's a reusable Book of Moon, letting you continually reuse the effect of cards like Mask of Darkness, Morphing Jar, Needle Worm, etc without losing any card advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDKMRV Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 If you ask me, they should ban everything that sounds good making us run Vanilla Decks. /Sarcasm Rekindling is broken if there are multiple targets for synchro summoning, but I doubt it would be touched because of Solemn Warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 This deck sucks as much as the opening for Bokurano is awesome. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05p646nlYS0 Too many s*** that's broken that's not limited or banned and vice versa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Solemn Warning is broken, so.... Also, Black Rose deserves to be at 3. (You have to successfully synchro summon into it FIRST, hope your opponent has no method of dealing with it, then proceed to summon more monsters. This means you're using a lot of cards. Well, unless you just played a Debris Dragon followed by a Rekindling. But Rekindling is banworthy and Debris Dragon is rather questionable, so that's a moot point. And all of this is taking place while your opponent has so many more cards committed to the field than you that the summon of Black Rose still instigates any significant advantage and that the proceeding swarm doesn't qualify as massive overextension.) If synchros were done right, Black Rose would be one of the few perfectly balanced field nukers out there. Frankly, in most situations where its possible, I choose Arcanite over him anyway. Oh, and Mind Crush can't exist at 3 in the same format as Trap Dustshoot, so it's a tossup between the two. Personally, I think Mind Crush serves a much better purpose for the game, since it can be strategically used to eliminate hand-activated cards such as Honest or Battle Fader (I won't metion Gorz since it's banworthy and I never see it played anyways), whereas Trap Dustshoot is just a lucksacked first turn card that lets you peak at your opponent's hand and screw up his strategy. LolTsukoyomi. She was teh key card in what was essentially a jury-rigged Yatalock. There are too many other cards that would have to be banned to consider bringing her back (In a good format, at least. I can't see her making a significant impact in a format where you can summon a massive beatstick at the drop of a hat and clear the field for 1/8 of your lifepoints, or summon 5 monsters for no cost, or loop into an OTK 50% of the time, etc. etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrathos Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Cards should either be forbidden or unlimited. Limiting/semi-limiting cards on adds to the randomness of the game and makes winning more about top-decks than actually having a good deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 [quote name='Wrathos' timestamp='1283152870' post='4581287'] Cards should either be forbidden or unlimited. Limiting/semi-limiting cards on adds to the randomness of the game and makes winning more about top-decks than actually having a good deck. [/quote] True but cards like Night Assailant are cases where Limits actually make sense since you can no longer abuse the infinite discard fodder properties 2 Night Assailants create by Limiting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1283130878' post='4580461'] Not everything banned is because of OTK or FTKs. Believe it or not, some cards are just abuseable or broken in their own right. Tsukyomi was banned alongside Time Seal. It comboed with Mask of Darkness and Time Seal/Drop Off. It's a reusable Book of Moon, letting you continually reuse the effect of cards like Mask of Darkness, Morphing Jar, Needle Worm, etc without losing any card advantage. [/quote] Hmmm, i can see how infinite drop off could be bad. I get it. YAY POST 1234. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Quadraxis says this list is horrible. End of Story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 HEY GUYS WE SHOULD LIMIT SPORE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Rekindling will not be banned yet... Konami will keep it at 3 because it is totally flying under their RADAR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superdoopertrooper Posted August 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 [quote name='Byakk' timestamp='1283205506' post='4582865'] HEY GUYS WE SHOULD LIMIT SPORE [/quote] No need at all. It's effect says "Once per duel". We could allow 20 per deck and everything would still be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.