evilfusion Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Because Welche likes to gripe about this when I take note of it, you should maybe add something to the effect of what the bare minimum content of a topic post should include. I've come across a few TCG topics where they put the name of a card in the title, but they don't include a link to the card, a picture, OR the card lore, etc. In other words, it's a discussion topic where you have to literally do the most basic research on your own other than the name, and are helpfully provided with the word "Discuss" or similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hatcher Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 It's under 'Stuff that is allowed but will be treated with more scrutiny or be revoked if it abused profusely by the members of YCM:' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Evilfusion, what you did was retarded at best. Anyway the new rules seem pretty fair and actually increase what we can post here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 It's under 'Stuff that is allowed but will be treated with more scrutiny or be revoked if it abused profusely by the members of YCM:' Ah, I was searching for it under the "preferred form of posting" and the "definitely gets you warned" sections. Evilfusion, what you did was retarded at best. Anyway the new rules seem pretty fair and actually increase what we can post here. Giving feedback to check for weak rule spots or loopholes is retarded? Duly noted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Locking my thread for not having a picture which wasn't a rule and no one had ever done before, then the next day after making the new rule known you start just giving out warnings, all in a section you aren't supposed to be moderating according to Pika. That's what I was talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hatcher Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 I just realized I never gave a formal declaration on my thoughts on tournaments. On the one hand, just about every single post after "I'm registering!" is spam. On the other hand, tournaments are fun and I would feel like an ass for taking them away. So what say you TCG-chan!? a) No tournaments. EVER!b) Tournaments. ALWAYS!c) Take it on a case-by-case basis and do something to prove you're worthy of that TCG moderator status you ignorant slut. Vote! Gogogo!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 A Tournament section is a no-no, right?. If that's the case, then I vote B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kanade Otonashi Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 ...I kinda prefer having them available. I mean, lately I've gotten tired of dueling, but I've enjoyed watching them. Also, that last one I don't quite get. How do you prove yourself enough to be able to host a tourney? I mean, as far as I'm concerned, someone like me would never be able to host one with that rule, since it's so vague and I'm really not worth anything. But I enjoy hosting them, and people seemed to enjoy the one I did make, with the Structure Decks and stuff. Plus I kinda wanted to make more like that, so yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest .Rai Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 I vote we cut off both off Pika's hands. So, we can *puts on sunglasses* put it into our own hands. AWWWWW YEAH It's bad because it's in our hands anyway. B or C. I'm impartial to either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kokonoe Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 C, unless we can also use the Other TCG section strictly for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 B and C. YCML, and YCML only, should keep the format it used January if he hold another one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 I'd rather enjoy a stickied thread listing peoples YCM, DN, Skype / MSN / AOL, and name in one general list, so people can get in contact on their own terms to create their own tournaments. Just a suggestion. And have maybe YCML as the only YCM offical tournament to be discussed in our TCG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hatcher Posted April 9, 2012 Report Share Posted April 9, 2012 A Tournament section is a no-no, right?.We'd need an active admin for that. C, unless we can also use the Other TCG section strictly for them.I personally don't care what happens in Other TCGs but I assume others do and would prefer not to dump on them. I'd rather enjoy a stickied thread listing peoples YCM, DN, Skype / MSN / AOL, and name in one general list, so people can get in contact on their own terms to create their own tournaments.The thing about that is that it has to be constantly updated and after... say, a year... I guarantee half the people on the list wouldn't still be on YCM or play DN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 28, 2012 Report Share Posted October 28, 2012 How the hell did the above spambot find a topic from April? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest .Rai Posted October 28, 2012 Report Share Posted October 28, 2012 How the hell did the above spambot find a topic from April? Admittedly, you're allowed to necrobump this topic if you have a qualm with TCG rules anyway. So the spambot did no wrong (apart from being a spambot and spamming). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 28, 2012 Report Share Posted October 28, 2012 Admittedly, you're allowed to necrobump this topic if you have a qualm with TCG rules anyway. So the spambot did no wrong (apart from being a spambot and spamming).I don't have a problem with ze rules or anything, but since the topic wasn't pinned, I'm amazed at how these people find these topics from months backs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted October 28, 2012 Report Share Posted October 28, 2012 Admittedly, you're allowed to necrobump this topic if you have a qualm with TCG rules anyway. So the spambot did no wrong (apart from being a spambot and spamming). But what's the point of keeping this topic if Pika pinned a new thread for that purpose? I don't have a problem with ze rules or anything, but since the topic wasn't pinned, I'm amazed at how these people find these topics from months backs. I've come to expect it from spambots. It's when actual people bump topics that are years old when I wonder how someone decided thought that was wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.