Brinolovania Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080526040046/yugioh/images/4/4a/GracefulCharityHL04-EN-UPR-UE.png[/img] What if the numbers were switched (you draw 2 then discard 3)? Would i still be on the banlist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 As it currently stands: +0 In the form you suggested: -2 ...Yeah, I'd say it would be put to 3 if that were the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1286740155' post='4694468'] As it currently stands: +0 In the form you suggested: -2 ...Yeah, I'd say it would be put to 3 if that were the case. [/quote] Gogo Darkworlds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 [quote name='-Pacman-' timestamp='1286739575' post='4694421'] [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080526040046/yugioh/images/4/4a/GracefulCharityHL04-EN-UPR-UE.png[/img] [b]What if you draw 2 then discard 1?[/b] Would i still be on the banlist? [/quote] Fix'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted October 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 That would put it at 2 or 1... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 [quote name='-Griffin' timestamp='1286740369' post='4694487'] Gogo Darkworlds. [/quote] If it was "Draw 2 cards, then discard 3 cards" The discarding isn't a cost right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 Draw 2 - Discard 1: So it becomes like Destiny Draw, for every single deck and with less of a specification? In a meta where plenty of cards thrive on either being sent to the grave or having the grave for resources? It's nothing but a slightly lesser version of Graceful Charity. It still has all of the problems Graceful Charity did, and even more because now more cards are added into the mix. Draw 2 - Discard 3: Sounds like a boon to Infernity or Darkworld. I'm not so familiar with either, so I wouldn't know how much of a thing it would be for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted October 10, 2010 Report Share Posted October 10, 2010 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1286743265' post='4694628'] Draw 2 - Discard 1: So it becomes like Destiny Draw, for every single deck and with less of a specification? In a meta where plenty of cards thrive on either being sent to the grave or having the grave for resources? It's nothing but a slightly lesser version of Graceful Charity. It still has all of the problems Graceful Charity did, and even more because now more cards are added into the mix. Draw 2 - Discard 3: Sounds like a boon to Infernity or Darkworld. I'm not so familiar with either, so I wouldn't know how much of a thing it would be for them. [/quote] Of course, over half the cards in the game crave the Graveyard and it's only going to get worse. And yes, a [i]"draw 2 & discard 1"[/i] could be abused in already powerful decks, but it would also add some general draw power to decks that have access to none. Maybe a [i]"Draw 2 cards, then send 1 card from your hand to your deck"[/i] effect? I actually got to play in Traditional Format (roughly 15 duels) and I loved using Pot of Greed and Graceful Charity again. My Harpie Deck has no draw power in Advanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 draw 2 ditch 3 could only be really effective in decks that like -2's... otherwise it's not that great. draw 2 ditch 1 is overly generic draw that is bad for this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 Hmm, what about draw 2 ditch 2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 still a -1, certain decks could abuse that.... others might ignore it..... depends i spose..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 [quote name='Welche' timestamp='1286775556' post='4695765'] Hmm, what about draw 2 ditch 2? [/quote] [img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100725062157/yugioh/images/e/ed/HandDestructionDP07-EN-R-1E.png[/img] OT: Graceful Charity is difficult. In its current state, it's bannable, but any real attempts to try to mitigate its bannable features makes the card markedly less useable and useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 but Graceful says discard, which allows Darkworld to use it somewhat, so its better than Hand D and doesn't rely on your opponent. but yeah, there's nothing you can really do to graceful to make it balanced yet playable. not that discussing it will make a difference anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 itt: a pointless discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 Discard 1. Draw 2: Limitworthy, unless archetype specific Discard 2. Draw 2: Lolhanddestruction (sorta) Discard 3. Draw 2: Meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 [quote name='Bringeroficecream' timestamp='1286781941' post='4695845'] [img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100725062157/yugioh/images/e/ed/HandDestructionDP07-EN-R-1E.png[/img] OT: Graceful Charity is difficult. In its current state, it's bannable, but any real attempts to try to mitigate its bannable features makes the card markedly less useable and useful. [/quote] um hand destruction is different to discard 2 and draw 2. :/ Discard 2 and draw 2 would be bad Draw 2 and discard 2 would of okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 However, it IS the exact amount of pure card advantage, which was the point you were making earlier. [quote name='Byakk' timestamp='1286789359' post='4695909'] itt: a pointless discussion. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 But draw 2 dicard 2 would be vell better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted October 12, 2010 Report Share Posted October 12, 2010 yes, but still results in a loss of card advantage. the only good factor is that Broww can take advantage of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.