.Nu-13 Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 [i]X-Saber Souza | *7 | EARTH [Warrior/Synchro/Effect] 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner "X-Saber" monsters During your Main Phase, you can Tribute 1 "X-Saber" monster to have this card gain 1 of the following effects until the End Phase: ●If this card battles a monster, destroy that monster without applying Damage Calculation. ●This card cannot be destroyed by the effects of Trap Cards. ATK/2500 DEF/1600[/i] Discuss. Not that terrible IMO, especially in this meta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 In a Trap heavy meta, this could actually be quite decent. Definitely a better Level 7 Saber than Urbellum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttercup Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Yay, only 1 original Saber can be played now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 2500 > 2200 => This > Urbellum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Rrey Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1287423091' post='4715136'] 2500 > 2200 => This > Urbellum [/quote] This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Konami should be shot for giving X-Sabers another Synchro that serves to further the already top tier theme (In America [bad TAS reference I know]). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 they gone back to x-sabers instead of xx-sabers (x-sabers being the original name) - i'd run this in sabers when it gets released in TCG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 *whipes forehead* And I thought it's effect would be broken beyond belief. It's decent, not like Sabers needed any more support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fader Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Close call, knowing Sabers I thought it would be an OTK card, but still, why would they give a broken Archetype even more support? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 [quote name='.:Fader:.' timestamp='1287434629' post='4715648'] why would they give a broken Archetype even more support? [/quote] It's Konami. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCodyPwns Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 This coming out in Storm of Rag? Or.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 [quote name='MrCodyPwns' timestamp='1287436611' post='4715720'] This coming out in Storm of Rag? Or.... [/quote] no - v-jump edition 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 It's really good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuffyLaxer Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Spam of Darksoul for the win anyone Yeah they shouldn't give Spam Sabers anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Konami. They'll give moar support to a archetype just to make moar money, but won't think about fixing their game. Decent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 [quote]they gone back to x-sabers instead of xx-sabers (x-sabers being the original name) - i'd run this in sabers when it gets released in TCG[/quote] There were only 9 X-Sabers. They needed to make a 10th one. inb4CommanderGottoms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 They decided to replace Gottoms with a new X-saber, because they wanted to release more but they didn't want to go with XXX-Saber, and giving it a name like XXI-Saber would make it unable to use the support... Why don't go with XXIX-Saber? Or just LX-Saber, that would leave a lot of space for future X-Saber monster names... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted October 20, 2010 Report Share Posted October 20, 2010 How about we dont need anymore X-Sabers? Mmmkay? Need overpowered support for Worms and AOJ's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.