Toffee. Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 [quote name='TheTurtleOnceCalledGod' timestamp='1287941519' post='4732361'] This card is decent, but who destroys by battle nowadays? [/quote] This is why Miracle's Wake was created. Its a "fair" revival card for a non-existant engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 Aww...but Stardust Dragon likes Miracle's Wake...so does Voltic Bicorn, for that matter. And a number of Zombies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 just make it Guardian Serket... Brionac was limited when it was released to the TCG, and there it was unlimited until next banlist... whats the difference with Temple? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 Uh...Temple's banned, not limited? Sounds like a good difference to me. Plus, Temple is known to be EXTREMELY broken due to the FTKs. Makyura was banned upon TCG release, wasn't it? In DB1? And wasn't Exchange of the Spirit also banned on release? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 Is that a rhetorical question? because I dont actually know the answer. Everything before Phantom Darkness is prehistory for me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 The point ultimately is, just because Brionac was the exception, being released between banlists and allowed to be in 3 for the TCG, does not mean a BANNED card, especially one banned for an extremely long time in the OCG, should be allowed to run rampant in the TCG for a format. Brionac being unlimited demonstrated that it was pretty broken and deserved the limit, if not a banning. A known banned card that allows disturbingly consistent FTKs should not be allowed despite its late TCG release. Makyura the Destroyer was only released in Dark Beginning, a reprint set. It was always banned to my knowledge. Exchange of the Spirit was released as a promo and I've heard it was banned from the beginning of its TCG release. Temple of the Kings and Serket were pretty much released for the sake of it to tie in to the Marik deck release (which in itself is so absurdly late coming to the TCG, we're already in 5ds era). They were even advertised as being banned. They're collector's cards and nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 So Temple is oficially banned in TCG, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 24, 2010 Report Share Posted October 24, 2010 It should be, yes. Wiki says it is, anyway. I haven't checked the official site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted October 25, 2010 Report Share Posted October 25, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1287958292' post='4733406'] The point ultimately is, just because Brionac was the exception, being released between banlists and allowed to be in 3 for the TCG, does not mean a BANNED card, especially one banned for an extremely long time in the OCG, should be allowed to run rampant in the TCG for a format. Brionac being unlimited demonstrated that it was pretty broken and deserved the limit, if not a banning. A known banned card that allows disturbingly consistent FTKs should not be allowed despite its late TCG release. Makyura the Destroyer was only released in Dark Beginning, a reprint set. It was always banned to my knowledge. Exchange of the Spirit was released as a promo and I've heard it was banned from the beginning of its TCG release. Temple of the Kings and Serket were pretty much released for the sake of it to tie in to the Marik deck release (which in itself is so absurdly late coming to the TCG, we're already in 5ds era). They were even advertised as being banned. They're collector's cards and nothing more. [/quote] hmmm.. I think Makyura was released as a Super Rare in [b]"Labyrinth or Nightmare"[/b].. haven't really checked to confirm yet though.. *goes to investigate* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted October 25, 2010 Report Share Posted October 25, 2010 *does check* According to Wiki, the only TCG set it was in was Dark Beginning 1, and it was not in any Japanese pack that we have a TCG equivalent of, not counting the Japanese Marik deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted October 25, 2010 Report Share Posted October 25, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1287966766' post='4733940'] *does check* According to Wiki, the only TCG set it was in was Dark Beginning 1, and it was not in any Japanese pack that we have a TCG equivalent of, not counting the Japanese Marik deck. [/quote] Did check in Labyrinth of Nightmare, Metal Raiders, Magic Rulers, Pharaonic Servant, Pharaoh's Guardian, Dark Crisis, Legacy of Darkness, Invation of Chaos (got a little too entertained looking at the lists lol) You are right D: I always thought we had it before... Dx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 25, 2010 Report Share Posted October 25, 2010 [quote name='Saikano' timestamp='1287958841' post='4733440'] So Temple is oficially banned in TCG, right? [/quote] yes it is, they made it clear it was gonna be banned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.