What would happen if Konami Changed the rules to the other extreme?

[CrabHelmet]

The maximum number of copies of a card that your deck may contain is increased from 3 to 60.

Discuss what the format and banlist would look like.

[Sweetie Belle]

Hmm... Very large. Very, very large.

you'd see a plethora of Limited and Forbidden cards, and people might just stop playing because it would be significantly more difficult to keep track of it. Or just completely disregard the banlist in it's entirety.

[darkwolf777]

We'd finally be able to make a great Harpie Lady deck then.

[BDKMRV]

I'll make a deck with 15 Flamvell Firedog, 10 Flamvell Magician, 10 Ryko, 10 Rekindling, and 5 Mirror Force

[Mugendramon]

...don't know. A deck consisting of one each of the Exodia parts, and repeated Pot of Greed's is the example in the top of my head which would prove this idea stupid. [i]Whoever begins, wins.[/i] Would that make any sense?

[Zkaiser]

My new Decklists!!

Exodia.dek

Monsters:
1 Exodia the Forbidden One
1 Left Leg of the Forbidden One
1 Right Leg of the Forbidden One
1 Left Arm of the Forbidden One
1 Right Arm of the Forbidden One

Spells:
34 Upstart Goblins

Traps:
1 Mirror Force

Super Mill.dek

Monster:
3 Outstanding Dog Marron

Spells:
36 Card Destruction

Traps:
1 Mirror Force

[byak]

I wanna run 60 tomato.dek

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

We'd have YCMers advocating the limitation of a plethora of cards to 3-59 per Deck because "they're only a little bit bad for the game or pretty close to bad for the game" etc.

[Just Crouton]

I'd run 25 Machina Fortresses, 10 Gearframes, and 5 Forces.

[Brinolovania]

I run 59xPot of Greed, and 1xMagical Explosion.

[Dr. Cakey]

59 Celtic Guardian
1 Elemental Hero Avian

[Brinolovania]

[quote name='Dr. Cakey' timestamp='1289177468' post='4770444']
59 Celtic Guardian
[b]1 Elemental Hero Avian[/b]
[/quote]
That ruins the whole deck.

[CrabHelmet]

It's a good thing that the opening post implied that there would be absolutely no banlist, which makes it easy to create autowin FTK decks. It would be a shame if the opening post explicitly indicated that the banlist would be updated to reflect this change, wouldn't it?

YCM, you never cease to amuse me.

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

^Looks like an oversight on your part, FOOL.

[Toffee.]

Obligatory Exodia x5 + Upstart Goblin x55
??????????????
11/10 topic?

[Azuh]

Pot of Greed x 55
Exodia x 5

[DARKPLANT RISING]

This topic makes no sense!

[Zkaiser]

I would run antimeta: 15 Droll & Lock Birds, 15 Mind Crushes and 10 Secret Villages.

[TheTurtleOnceCalledGod]

Do topics ever make sense on YCM?
No seriously, brilliant topic.
How about 60 copies of sparks?
[s]+1 Post Count[/s]

[Buttercup]

The stuff already on our list would be on the list.

Upstart and Into the Void would be on the list, obv.

It would probably lead to more consistent decks and the power of tutors like Darksoul/ Gadgets would be limited, maybe.

That seems like all of it tbh.

[Catterjune]

[quote]Discuss what the format and banlist would look like. [/quote]

As in, the obvious 55 Pot of Greed, 5 Exodia pieces would be banned.

On-topic: I can't really think of any card that would deserve immediate list attention compared to what most rational people think is bannable. Exodia's head, Magical Explosion, Card Destruction. The banlist wouldn't be too different from what most consider the one ideal format, just a few random cards to prevent milling or burn from being too strong. Or at least, that's what I think.

[Anacondas1]

60 Larve moth obviously.
Either that or 60 Giant Germ

Anacondas1

[Yeezus]

[quote name='Azuh' timestamp='1289208331' post='4771214']
Pot of Greed x 55
Exodia x 5
[/quote]
not 100% ftk n****r

[Zkaiser]

[quote name='Placido.' timestamp='1289236688' post='4771644']
not 100% ftk [b]n****r[/b]
[/quote]
Wow,totally uncalled for.

[evilfusion]

How is it not? You have 6 cards in starting hand. (Deck: 54) Use Pot. (52) Use Pot 26 more times (Deck: 0) If you carry Exodia, you will have drawn it by now.