.Nu-13 Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 I can't post a link/pic (I'm on a phone), but I think you know the card. Could it be unbanned? Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Yes. It should. It isn't like you can throw it into any old deck.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solemn Silver Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Wasnt this part of an epic otk that would come back if even at 1? I could be wrong. if i am then i would be happy with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ＴＨＥ ＧＯＤ ＯＦ ＯＢＥＬＩＳＫ Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Limited in March 2011. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted January 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Was that serious or not? But imo, after Hole and Reborn get banned again, this can be @1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The ReBeL Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Black Whirlwind can now be played even more! More book abuse? More Cold Wave abuse if it's not banned? Trunade at 2 with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solemn Silver Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 If this is un-banned black whirlwind will be banned. Well its likely to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 [quote name='Ctrl+Alt+Win' timestamp='1294696698' post='4925826'] Wasnt this part of an epic otk that would come back if even at 1? I could be wrong. if i am then i would be happy with that. [/quote] The only OTK that I remember reading about with Magician of Faith had to do with Book of Eclipse and it didn't even work. The Idea was to play Book of Eclipse, then during the End Phase, Book of Eclipse would flip your own Magician of Faith up as your opponent drew Cards, then you'd reactivate Book of Eclipse from your hand during the same End Phase, to flip Magician back down, Eclipse would activate again and repeat until they decked out. The problem is that this doesn't work. Unless, there was some other OTK you're talking about. For whatever reason, them wikiers thought that your own Magician of Faith would flip face-up during the End Phase due to Book of Eclipse (Book of Eclipse only flips your OPPONENT'S cards face-up, not your own), so you cannot recycle Book of Eclipse this way, so it never worked to begin with. Heck, they still think you can Flip Summon as much as you want which is still incorrect... =.= I'm referring to this: * Activate "Book of Moon" on "Magician of Faith" to re-use its effect. * Use the above with "Mysterious Puppeteer" to gain infinite life assuming your opponent doesn't negate or break the cycle. Which of course you can only change a card's field position manually once per turn, so you couldn't do this either. I think that Book of Eclipse OTK was the only thing I ever edited off the wikia because it didn't work. I never changed anything off it before or after that o.x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Chess Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 I think this card could be at 1 or maybe even 2. I don't see too much in this card. So if this is banned, why isn't Mask of Darkness banned ? Definetly should be at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 If it came back, we would lose book of moon at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.B X Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 Three things to i have to say about it. -1: You want it unbanned, that doesn't mean it should be. -2: Mask of Darkness is @3, but that doesn't automatically mean that Magician of Faith should be at @1. -3: Trap cards cannot be activated the same turn they are recovered by MoD, they have to be set and wait until next turn, unlike MoF, free recovery of Spells that can be activated instantly. Plus, there is are other cards that allow you to use its powerful effect more than once, like Book of Moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 Diamond Dude's girlfriend... I wish she was @1... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathSDelano Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 [quote name='Expelsword' timestamp='1294710770' post='4926537'] Diamond Dude's girlfriend... I wish she was @1... [/quote] More like Diamond Dude's Great Grandmother anyways if it was @1 than i am sure numerous people would use it for a few turn of a spell you either A) wasted B)lost C)used when needed and want it again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 EVERY FORMAT GUYS COME ON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 this won't come back while Reborn is available. Next format will be the same cause they'll unban some other broken spell card. thus the infinite cycle of MoF never being unbanned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 MoF doesn't deserve to be banned. M Reborn, Dark Hole Trunade, and all that other bad stuff needs to be banned before MoF comes back. Book of Moon could be at 21 and it wouldn't harm the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 [quote name='InconsistentDecks' timestamp='1294697659' post='4925871'] Limited in March 2011. [/quote] They have said this every, single format Until Dark Hole, Cold Wave, Monster Reborn are gone, thats when it will return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 [quote name='War Chess' timestamp='1294703770' post='4926174'] I think this card could be at 1 or maybe even 2. I don't see too much in this card. So if this is banned, why isn't Mask of Darkness banned ? Definetly should be at 1. [/quote] Go back to General. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 Ban Reborn/Dark Hole and or BWW, then I can see this thing at 1 again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 Dark Hole is a billions times more epicer than this. Not worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 I still prefer having MR and DH @1 than this @1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 This Gets Limited Because of that Blackwhirlwind gets banned Because of that Blackwing Gale gets semi limited Because of that ALL the Crystal Beasts get banned makes sense to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 above: dont be bad Nobody would tech in a MoF into a deck. That would be f***ing inconsistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 [quote name='RobotBowtieOfDestruction' timestamp='1294775779' post='4927731'] above: dont be bad [/quote] He's merely repeating the absurdity of what YCM people already said about the idea of MoF at 1. Don't be illiterate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1294776258' post='4927747'] He's merely repeating the absurdity of what YCM people already said about the idea of MoF at 1. Don't be illiterate. [/quote] Referencing the crystal beasts thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.