Jump to content

The World Will End in 3 days


Maghion Syaoran Light

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Oh hey guys. I have some bad news...the world is ending...soon.

For those of you who don't know, June 17th, 2011 is the end of days.

YES, YOU CAN OBVIOUSLY SEE THE 17, HOWEVER, THERE IS MORE EVIL SPAWNING FROM THIS MOST OF UNHOLY DATES.

June = 6th month
Year = '11

6+11 = 17

THATS DOUBLE F****** 17. HOLY ****, WE'RE ******. D:<

Don't believe in Doubles?

Well check'em

[img]http://imageshack.us/m/842/5202/lolfaceq.jpg[/img]

Frunk has confirmed my suspicions...and if you want to go against two of us, you're going to be twice as wrong. That's just simple math.

As your Based God, I will need mighty worship...as worshipping me [s]does absolutely nothing[/s] gives me super strength.

Want the latest in breaking apocolypse news? Check 37 then.

Good luck and prepare yourself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Byakuya Kuchiki' timestamp='1305916964' post='5220892']
Technically it's an earthquake. Good thing we Buddhists don't have to do much math s***. No offense.
[/quote]
Thankfully, we Christians don't either. Cultists do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Nightmare Zarkus' timestamp='1305898609' post='5220480']
Definition of Theory
1: the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another
source: Webster

So theory CAN be fact, and in evolution's case, it is.
[/quote]

The definitions is about the relationships of fact. It never says a theory is indeed fact, merely an analysis. Just wanted to point out your misinterpretation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to make note of the fact that it hasn't been too often that a predicted end-of-world date has been overhyped and a movie and song are made about it, and then another date between now and that other date has taken the spotlight. Usually we go on a linear path, but now there is a bit of a partition. If the world ends tomorrow, it can't end in 2012, but if the world doesn't end tomorrow, it only might end in 2012. Usually we don't have the second part, it's either the world ends or doesn't, but now we have more than one layer to think about. It's like Inception; a date within a date, or not really, I just wanted to make a shitty analogy like everyone does.

If the world is going to end tomorrow, that really sucks. Too bad it isn't.

[quote name='Hinagiku Katsura' timestamp='1305684254' post='5215968']
Notice how people instantly become pious when it comes to stupidities like this, but insult the religions when there's nothing to do with them.

So if this doesn't happen, does that make the religion a lie or something? I don't follow the Bible, so I don't really know.

Either way, it is a joke.
[/quote]

Assuming Christianity wasn't already a lie to begin with, this doesn't add to the truth/lie factor of Christianity. I could say that "in the name of gravity" the world will end in seven minutes, but because gravity has nothing to do with the world ending, the world not ending does not disprove gravity. Christianity says nothing explicitly about when the world will end, therefore this retard does not show how false the religion is. Other things do that well enough.

[quote name='Zetsubou Black' timestamp='1305694343' post='5216201']
See this? Doesn't match up with Christianity, at all, except for what he predicted it will be like.
[/quote]

Unfortunately he cited Biblical passages and used "Biblical numbers", so it does tie into Christianity a lot. As I described above, it doesn't make Christianity any more false, but the bullshit prediction undeniably has Christian origins.

[quote name='ADHD-Guitar' timestamp='1305738475' post='5216946']
I keep telling you, he's not an extremist... >.>
[/quote]

Okay, so I guess you don't know what an extremist is, even though I so kindly defined it for you in the other thread. Thanks for being an ignorant moron, dude.

[quote name='ADHD-Guitar' timestamp='1305757054' post='5217673']
I believe the world will end some day. I guess that makes me an extremist.

In fact, I suppose any Christian that actually believes in the literal existence of God is an extremist.
[/quote]

No, it is scientifically proven that stars eventually expand until they run out of energy at which point they collapse, and it is predicted with a low level of uncertainty that within (I believe, as a rough estimate) four or five billion years, the Sun will expand to the point where the average temperature of the Earth will not be hospitable for human life, and the human race will die out. And it'll hit a threshold where the entire planet will be lifeless. You believing that the world is going to eventually end is a scientific fact. You believing that God is going to send meteors down like rain and flood every last square inch of the land on a particular date at a particular hour is exrtremist, and to say the least, bullshit and false.

Believing in a god is not an extremist belief, but it is safe to say that a lot of Christians who claim they aren't extremist really are. I'm not saying a majority of the religion has extremist beliefs, but consider the countless amount of people that are essentially brainwashed by their ministers into believing everything. Again, not everybody. Not even a majority. But a large enough portion to make a difference. The world is slowly turning less religious, but you still have retards that want to stone abortion doctors to death.

I've said this a million times and I'll reiterate it once more; as long as you don't interfere in another person's life, nobody cares how extremist your views are. The second you try to prevent someone from having an abortion or prevent a mosque from being built or prevent evolution from being taught in public schools, you are an extremist in many eyes, and generally retarded. I think the less religious make it a point to follow their own advice and not care whether someone is sleeping with someone of the same gender, or not care whether someone smokes a drug that is less lethal than nicotine. I oftentimes find religious extremists being right-wing or conservative, which isn't a great political background to hold in this day and age.
---

So apparently I missed someone bring up a theory versus fact argument. You are all retarded, or at least the people that think theories aren't generally facts.

The word theory in English and the word theory in science are two completely unrelated terms. I have a theory that all white people score between x and y on their SATs. Theory in that sentence was a synonym for hypothesis, which is completely not what a theory in science is.

Laws are things that are bound to the universe, known to be fact, and are undeniable.

Theories are things that are not bound to the universe, proven to be fact with very, [i]very[/i] little doubt, and are undeniable because no one has proven them wrong.

Microevolution and macroevolution are both scientific theories, with the former being more concrete than the latter. We know microevolution happens, with [b]100%[/b] certainty. And yet we still call it a scientific theory. So if you are arguing that theories cannot be facts, you are ignorant and should just shut up about this topic due to your lack of knowledge. Macroevoltuion is also a theory, has a world of support going for it, but because we don't have all the links and we don't have all of the knowledge about it, it's still developing bit by bit.

However, claiming that macroevolution is false is a [b]huge[/b] claim and requires a significant amount of evidence to convince anyone with half a brain. Macroevolution is in our textbooks because scientists can say it happens with a 99.99% certainty, and the only legitimate shadows of doubt are the origin(s) of life and a few evolutionary links and lack of information for some eras.

Don't mention that theories aren't facts unless you are explicitly not referring to scientific theories. If something is accepted by the majority of the scientific community, even if it is called a theory, you can call it a fact because there is sufficient amount of evidence going for it, [i]otherwise the scientific community would not have accepted it.[/i] I'd love it if you guys actually used your brains when talking about the theory versus fact topic, since it's really all common sense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so I get -Repped for sharing my opinion? Okay, Catholic...let us use that as an example.
Explain how it is humanly possible to have the Nile River split into two with a staff?
Stones with carvings in them that have never been found.
This could all just be stories, your faith is not my problem that you cannot see clearly without proof.
All of this could be made up by some guy who wanted to feel special and different.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Daemon' timestamp='1305922925' post='5221037']
Okay, so I get -Repped for sharing my opinion? Okay, Catholic...let us use that as an example.
Explain how it is humanly possible to have the Nile River split into two with a staff?
Stones with carvings in them that have never been found.
This could all just be stories, your faith is not my problem that you cannot see clearly without proof.
All of this could be made up by some guy who wanted to feel special and different.
[/quote]

You are probably new to religious topics and don't understand how they work. People get annoyed when someone insults their religion. You either have to not care about being negative repped (as if it really matters), or phrase your statements in such a way where you aren't directly insulting them. I saw some of your posts, and laughed at the fact that those were posts I made a year or so ago when I first started posting in religious topics. You don't need to cite the Nile River and stone carvings; I'm fairly sure that even a majority of Christians know that half the crap in the Bible is impossible, which is why a large portion of them claim we shouldn't interpret it literally but rather figuratively. Lay down on the accusations and start supporting your own side with... logic. <___<
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No God, no prediction, no bullshit from a book written by mad men is gonna seek how the worlds gonna end, the only factor of the world ending is us humans, look at the reality, we're wasteful, polluting the atmosphere with deadly chemicals...God is not gonna end the world, down the line humans is gonna end up destroying this miserable little planet we call Earth...truth...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Dark' timestamp='1305923229' post='5221048']
You don't need to cite the Nile River and stone carvings; I'm fairly sure that even a majority of Christians know that half the crap in the Bible is impossible, which is why a large portion of them claim we shouldn't interpret it literally but rather figuratively.
[/quote]

The majority of Christians are atheists? If a river splitting is impossible, I'm fairly sure the existence of omnipotent-potent being is impossible too. Dark, you keep pretending to be flabbergasted at anyone believing anything with any supernatural qualities to it, yet you keep acting like you're part of a minority.

Go ahead and respond with more of your snark bullshit, I'm done with this.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 1 Reply to this Cultist.
HE IS NOT CHRISTIAN, THE BIBLE, PRACTICALLY THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY HAS TOLD US THAT NEITHER US, JESUS OR ANY OF THE ANGELS IN HEAVEN KNOW, ONLY GOD KNOWS (Well, not really since I am not Christian Anymore, too many idiots who take it too seriuosly) WHEN THE GODDAMNED PLANETS GONNA END,
Now my predictions will be 1 of these things
1. Samus is gonna come to this planet and blow it up (Jk)
2. We will pollute this planet so much that it will eventually die.
3. 2012
4. 2032 Asteroid
5. This Clutist bastard is actually telling the truth unlike his 2 FAILED attempts.

I REQUEST A LOCK. I DO NOT MEAN TO OFFEND ANYONE.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Wears Diamond Armour*
*Encases self in bedrock*

Anyway, I'm a believer in What goes around; comes around and mostly I just believe Peace is better than War etc( If you are good; Good things Happen. And Visa-Versa) but, I can't see how someone can predict the end of the world, besides, The world could end any day,
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I was thinking about the Non-Christians (me) and how they are going to be affected by this. Kinda........(what's the word...)..well, yeah.

Also on that, Time zones. It's going to be 6:00 on May 21rst on our zones, and there will be no particular time when Christ appears. I dunno to be honest. This defies logic in much ways.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...