~British Soul~ Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [center][img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090201234344/yugioh/images/thumb/4/4a/TsukuyomiSD6-EN-C-1E.jpg/300px-TsukuyomiSD6-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img][/center] [center]discuss any shenanigans this could have it if went back to 1[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 This + Mask of Darkness + Drastic Drop Off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='-Makoto-' timestamp='1324031766' post='5710510'] This + Mask of Darkness + Drastic Drop Off. [/quote] Ban Mask of Darkness. Problem solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='-Makoto-' timestamp='1324031766' post='5710510'] This + Mask of Darkness + Drastic Drop Off. [/quote] That's not even a problem. If you can assemble a three-card combo, each of whose elements is either useless or at least not terribly impressive on its own, while simultaneously wiping out all cards to which your opponent has access, then you have quite rightfully earned a victory. (Assuming, of course, that the means by which you wiped out all cards to which your opponent has access was not itself broken, but in that case the problem still does not lie in this combo.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 TBH I think Tsukuyomi can come back, given its aibou Thousand-Eyes Restrict got the banhammer. If it came back it'd be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKaitoKid Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 I don't know. It seems fine at 1 but then you run the risk of it becoming a reusable [pronounced: spammable] Book Of Moon. Better @ 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='TheKaitoKid' timestamp='1324038899' post='5710586'] I don't know. It seems fine at 1 but then you run the risk of it becoming a reusable [pronounced: spammable] Book Of Moon. Better @ 0 [/quote] except like, it wastes your normal summon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='Shard' timestamp='1324038960' post='5710588'] except like, it wastes your normal summon [/quote] Add how it's Spell Speed 1, and thus can't be used for: -Stopping an attack -Dodging Mirror Force/D-Prison/Lightning Vortex/the latter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 Personally, I would like to see this card@1. As stated, its a Book of Moon that you are required to use the instant it hits the field, and also requires you to use your Normal Summon. So in a way, its like a double-edged sword. Plus, if this went to 1, I doubt every deck of the format would run this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 ...As this thread progresses on and on, I'm getting further concerned that this is perfectly fine at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 I'd lke to point out I never said this should stay banned. It would be perfectly fine @1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='-Makoto-' timestamp='1324043639' post='5710645'] I'd lke to point out I never said this should stay banned. It would be perfectly fine @1. [/quote] Maybe even 2. Wasn't it banned because loops? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 Guys.... Morphing Jar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 Dunno if it'll go @1 in March because September's the banlist more geared towards testing, but I wouldn't be opposed to this going to 1 in September 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 Tsukuyomi would be fine at 3. Tsukuyomi has never deserved to be on the list at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSektor Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 At 1 or even 2...The worst thing that could happen is Empty Jar.dek and Worms.dek get up 1 tier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 I love how people seem to think that, given the choice between a reuseable Sorcery version of Book of Moon that uses up your Normal Summon and a card whose effect is "Everyone discards everything and draws five cards", the former is somehow obviously the broken one. And never mind that all the combo does is allow an additional use of the latter, and even then only if the incredibly vulnerable latter can be made to survive destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 Why is this Forbidden? I mean, it gives you a Book of Moon. It just seems OK at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='Charlotte The Witch' timestamp='1324066717' post='5711193'] Why is this Forbidden? [/quote] Because bad players didn't understand the fundamental problem with Goat Control format (hence calling it Goat Control instead of something more sensible), and then Konami just decided to ban a bunch of popular cards at random. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='Crab Helmet' timestamp='1324066866' post='5711200'] Because bad players didn't understand the fundamental problem with Goat Control format (hence calling it Goat Control instead of something more sensible), and then Konami just decided to ban a bunch of popular cards at random. [/quote] Goat Control? You mean Nordic Beasts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='Charlotte The Witch' timestamp='1324067219' post='5711214'] Goat Control? You mean Nordic Beasts? [/quote] I think he means this: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Goat_Control Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 No, because then Zealgigas would cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='RAEGING RAYQUAZA' timestamp='1324067845' post='5711236'] I think he means this: [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Goat_Control"]http://yugioh.wikia....ki/Goat_Control[/url] [/quote] Oh. Seems kinda silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumberCruncher Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 [quote name='Charlotte The Witch' timestamp='1324067219' post='5711214'] Goat Control? You mean Nordic Beasts? [/quote] *facepalm* In all honesty, this is probably one of the most likely cards to come back if Konami decides to take a card off the banlist. If it were to come back, It'd probably only be at one, though it would be nice at 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 I'm becoming more and more concerned that Charlotte is bad at the game. OT: Okay, then, ban Morphing Jar and put this to 2. No one uses Morphing Jar besides Empty anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.