byak Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 Except, unlike Hornet, Ladybug is terrible when you're only drawing is copies of itself (similar to using Hornet to equip a Hornet) and Hopper. Without Centipede, the deck's playstyle would change from get all of the advantage in one turn to utilizing Hornet to destroy things every turn while maintaining field advantage to keep the destruction going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 [quote name='byakklon Omega' timestamp='1336774137' post='5937451'] Except, unlike Hornet, Ladybug is terrible when you're only drawing is copies of itself (similar to using Hornet to equip a Hornet) and Hopper. Without Centipede, the deck's playstyle would change from get all of the advantage in one turn to utilizing Hornet to destroy things every turn while maintaining field advantage to keep the destruction going. [/quote] With Cent the deck remains consistent and it is able to make plays. Honest just turns every inzektor monster in your deck to "destroy one card on the field then make your plays" Last time I checked consistency was good for the game and "huurr duurr destroy everything for free" was bad. The other issue is dragon fly and hornet being in the same archtype..those 2 cards by themselves generate too much advantage at too little cost...its almost as bad as JD when you think about it... "s*** i'm losing.... oh wait i top decked a dragon fly....can you stop it? no? ok i go off just because I summoned 1 card.... yup im pro." So either hit Dragonfly or Hornet...more so Hornet. I rather a deck be consistent than "hurr durr I pops everythang!...everythang? everythang!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 [quote name='Le Magician' timestamp='1336777169' post='5937498'] With Cent the deck remains consistent and it is able to make plays. Honest just turns every inzektor monster in your deck to "destroy one card on the field then make your plays" Last time I checked consistency was good for the game and "huurr duurr destroy everything for free" was bad. The other issue is dragon fly and hornet being in the same archtype..those 2 cards by themselves generate too much advantage at too little cost...its almost as bad as JD when you think about it... "s*** i'm losing.... oh wait i top decked a dragon fly....can you stop it? no? ok i go off just because I summoned 1 card.... yup im pro." So either hit Dragonfly or Hornet...more so Hornet. I rather a deck be consistent than "hurr durr I pops everythang!...everythang? everythang!" [/quote] If you hit Dragonfly the deck can still get Dragonfly back 10000 times with Sword, Giga, Call, etc. While the same can be applied to Centipede, the notable part is that Centipede is the best Dragonfly target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 [quote name='byakklon Omega' timestamp='1336778231' post='5937507'] If you hit Dragonfly the deck can still get Dragonfly back 10000 times with Sword, Giga, Call, etc. While the same can be applied to Centipede, the notable part is that Centipede is the best Dragonfly target. [/quote] Thats nice. But its not how Konami does things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 Konami's predicted responses: Inzektors: AH A BEE! Wind-Ups: It appears that the hunter has become the hunted and SHHIIIIIIIIIIIIIPWRECK Dino/Verz Rabbit: It's rabbit season Hieratics and Chaos Dragons: We're revoking your medical license. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 I got a bit dissapointed in the fact that our first meta Deck revolving about Insect-Types looks no different than a meta Deck revolving around Warrior-Types, because they are just people dressed like Beetleborts, not actual insects. . . . . . . . . . ... oh, and there's also the balance issue, isn't there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 [quote name='Berry Punch~' timestamp='1336789164' post='5937649'] I got a bit dissapointed in the fact that our first meta Deck revolving about Insect-Types looks no different than a meta Deck revolving around Warrior-Types, because they are just people dressed like Beetleborts, not actual insects. [/quote] [i]And[/i] Warriors as a whole are commonly based on Equip Cards. So it's like Konami made the archetype, then realized people wanted an Insect archetype (seeing as there are approximately [i]zero[/i]) and renamed them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.