Strider Tigerwolf Posted October 16, 2012 Report Share Posted October 16, 2012 Actually this abuses...holy crap! O_o Phoenix.dek is now a burn/nuke deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted October 16, 2012 Report Share Posted October 16, 2012 The thing is, this never made anything more broken. Why does a deck that can already win if it has 5 FIRE monsters in the graveyard need another win con? It's certainly a decent addition considering the fact that, most of the time, it's Ring of Destruction, but it's not exactly going to do anything that the deck couldn't do before. It's definitely not making Lavals/whatever more consistent, but is it making it more explosive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted October 16, 2012 Report Share Posted October 16, 2012 Wasn't ring of destruction banned for a good reason? What makes this any better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted October 16, 2012 Report Share Posted October 16, 2012 [quote name='みゆきサン' timestamp='1350417556' post='6045925'] Lavals to Tier 0. Hooray. Now I have to listen to Expelsword's fangasming every day for the next three hundred years. [/quote] Lavals don't even need this, but I guess it's an alternative to Quasar finishers... where can I find the space? Sacreds may be my new thing, with all the support they're getting now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 17, 2012 Report Share Posted October 17, 2012 [quote name='mido9' timestamp='1350410915' post='6045827'] moulinglacia-[/quote] Glacia is actually problematic(to an extent), seeing as it has a RotA that even fuels its own Summon >__> [quote name='Chance Furlong' timestamp='1350418352' post='6045948'] Wasn't ring of destruction banned for a good reason? What makes this any better?[/quote] As I mentioned earlier... This isn't as splashable as Ring, and is a lot slower then it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNo.101 S.H. Death Knight Posted October 17, 2012 Report Share Posted October 17, 2012 given this only belong to fire Decks wouldn't warrant to ban it, only the fact what will abuse this in fire Decks may pass judgment on it but not as heavy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted October 17, 2012 Report Share Posted October 17, 2012 [quote name='Chance Furlong' timestamp='1350418352' post='6045948'] Wasn't ring of destruction banned for a good reason? What makes this any better? [/quote] Ignore Ring's burn. Then it's just "Destroy 1 monster on the field". Find me another card with that effect. Then, Ring is a Trap, which in this case is better than being a Spell because being a Trap allows it to disrupt plays. The double-burn, I would say, is just the icing that changes it from being worthy of a limit to a ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted October 17, 2012 Report Share Posted October 17, 2012 [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1350440074' post='6046402'] Glacia is actually problematic(to an extent), seeing as it has a RotA that even fuels its own Summon >__> As I mentioned earlier... This isn't as splashable as Ring, and is a lot slower then it. [/quote] [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1350440074' post='6046402'] As I mentioned earlier... This isn't as splashable as Ring, and is a lot slower then it. [/quote] [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1350440074' post='6046402'] This isn't as splashable as Ring, and is a lot slower then it. [/quote] [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1350440074' post='6046402'] is a lot slower then it. [/quote] [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1350440074' post='6046402'] [b]a lot[/b] [/quote] [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1350440074' post='6046402'] [size=8][b]a lot[/b][/size] [/quote][img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120928175632/yugioh/images/thumb/6/65/MoltenConductionField-DT07-EN-DNPR-DT.png/300px-MoltenConductionField-DT07-EN-DNPR-DT.png[/img] One card immediate setup isn't a lot slower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted October 17, 2012 Report Share Posted October 17, 2012 [quote name='Agro' timestamp='1350478597' post='6046575'] [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120928175632/yugioh/images/thumb/6/65/MoltenConductionField-DT07-EN-DNPR-DT.png/300px-MoltenConductionField-DT07-EN-DNPR-DT.png[/img] One card immediate setup isn't a lot slower. [/quote] He means you have to use it on your turn, where, theoretically, you could die before you can respond with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 17, 2012 Report Share Posted October 17, 2012 [quote name='Expelsword - 黎明' timestamp='1350483781' post='6046609'] He means you have to use it on your turn, where, theoretically, you could die before you can respond with it.[/quote] No. I meant that Ring could be used any turn beyond Setting it, and required no effort to play what-so ever. Pyrorex actually requires a bit of set-up, and isn't as herpderp as Ring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted October 17, 2012 Report Share Posted October 17, 2012 I honestly don't see it as overpowered. Ring of Destruction was, in my opinion, banned for 2 reasons. 1. You could, at any time, drop a monster on the field. Your turn, your opponent's turn, and so on. 2. It caused tie games to occur MUCH more frequently. While this does have the potential of causing the second, it does not have the first that made it so completely broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 Oh.... My.... God... [img]http://imageshack.us/a/img16/4444/uproda511831.jpg[/img] My body was not ready for this. Its artwork, I cannot describe the magnitude of how incredibly beautiful this is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 [img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120207082932/yugioh/images/thumb/6/67/DarkArmedDragon-SDDC-EN-C-1E.jpg/300px-DarkArmedDragon-SDDC-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img] I see similarities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 "Pie - Roar - Rex" Pyro - Rex Cause its a dinosaur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 Yea, they [i]DO[/i] look similar. Except Rex is... Basically an obscure Space Godzilla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 Sexy card is sexy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Xathers Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 ... I want him to father my babies. O__O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 [url="http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/359341-mother-of-god"][img]http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/359/341/b8b.gif[/img][/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 Dat artwork~ Me gusta machismo~ *inb4macho* Also...to some extent the effect is "semi confirmed (translation please)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 Ther artwork is waaay better than what I expected: I was looking forward to a big T-rex covered in flames, but a Godzilla in black&gold armor is Boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1350532763' post='6047035'] [img]http://imageshack.us/a/img16/4444/uproda511831.jpg[/img] [/quote] MY .... GOD...that artwork is ....*faints* ... *gets back up*... I didn't not expect such sexy artwork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birkeland Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 New effect: Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must be Special Summoned (from your hand) by having exactly 5 FIRE monsters in your Graveyard, and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways. [b]When this card is Special Summoned: Target 1 monster your opponent controls; destroy it, and if you do, inflict damage to both players equal to half of its original ATK.[/b] The effect of "Pyrorex the Elemental Lord" can only be activated once per turn. If this card leaves the field, skip the Battle Phase of your next turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted October 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 [quote name='Birkeland' timestamp='1350586494' post='6047503'] New effect: Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must be Special Summoned (from your hand) by having exactly 5 FIRE monsters in your Graveyard, and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways. [b]When this card is Special Summoned: Target 1 monster your opponent controls; destroy it, and if you do, inflict damage to both players equal to half of its original ATK.[/b] The effect of "Pyrorex the Elemental Lord" can only be activated once per turn. If this card leaves the field, skip the Battle Phase of your next turn. [/quote] ..Because I totally didn't edit the OP just now, so your post has become a +1. Seriously, I saw the new effect and went to edit the OP before I saw your post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 Meh. I'll live with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shizuku Oikawa Posted October 18, 2012 Report Share Posted October 18, 2012 I won't run it now. Not enough explosiveness to be worth the setup in my opinion. Sure it has a giant body of ATK and all, but.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.