mido9 Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 You can still run DMoC without running Temperance if open with Judgement. Just Special Summon Justice at the end phase and tribute it for DMoC and Life, discard DMoC due hand limit and bring it back next turn with Life. It'd be funny to add judgment with DMOC after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 [quote name="Ahri" post="6130464" timestamp="1359310441"]It won in the OCG a fair bit from what I recall. From what I recall, anyway. So it's already up there. :v[/quote] Welp That's news to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted January 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 I'm really considering running Infinite Cards with this... If you're playing Spellbooks and haven't won by your second turn, you are doing it wrong. Thank you, someone is on my side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 Wait, will the TCG name of this be Solemn Judgment of the Spellbooks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 I know, I know. I was just playing along to make this thread more fun. you didn't read my ninja edit did you To enjoy a set of sarcasm, it is better to have a sarcastic one and at least one victim. Two sarcastic ones talking among themselves with no victim kills the fun. That said, you need to be the victim for this to work, no excuses. OT: What's Konami really thinking with this? Their way of doing things gradually scares away it's casual audience. Who are they trying to please with this kind of effect? Pretty much everyone thinks knows this is bullsh*t design, and everyone knows there is a difference between "That is GOOD! I totally want it!" and "That's too much, instead of being exited I'm annoyed now", and they no longer seem to know the difference. All I see around is comments like "I did not need this to have a chance with my Spellbooks Konami, why?" and the sort around the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 Thank you, someone is on my side. Everyone's on your "side" with this card. The card's obviously absurd in every way whatsoever, and some of the posts, such as mine, couldn't be more sarcastic if they tried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 Does anyone notice that this card makes Destroyer [i]extremely more[/i] playable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 Opponent's face, when you play this card:Though, what would be funny.... Is a Prophecy version of Muka-Muka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 I was dueling against Ninjas when I played this card twice in one duel. He BTH'd one Destroyer...only to have another Destroyer take its place via Judgment. Needless to say, he surrendered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 Temperance is pretty strong if you're Cordero Spencer and you use it twice in a turn. Spellbooks have long turns, you sometimes forget effects that have already been activated and what restrictions there may be. He admitted he made a mistake, and it's foolish to automatically assume someone is cheating because they made a move they can't. On topic, though, I actually feel that at 3 it might clog too much, and it's searchable anyways, so you might as well run only 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunar Origins Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 Spellbooks have long turns, you sometimes forget effects that have already been activated and what restrictions there may be. He admitted he made a mistake, and it's foolish to automatically assume someone is cheating because they made a move they can't. On topic, though, I actually feel that at 3 it might clog too much, and it's searchable anyways, so you might as well run only 2. hell, it clogs at one, just run half Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 It really just depends on what else you get in your hand, I suppose. Having extras can't hurt too bad. Can be a horrible topdeck without the right cards in hand (though if you don't have those cards then you've probably lost already anyways). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 [quote name="Endeavour" post="6130550" timestamp="1359316951"]Wait, will the TCG name of this be Solemn Judgment of the Spellbooks?[/quote] OCG Solemn Judgment was "Declaration of God", so this thing will probably just stay as "Divine Judgment of the Spellbooks". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airride Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 Should say per duel (Not that it would make a difference) This is overall very insane. At least if you use it during your turn your opponent CAN counter attack...And if they don't, probably lose next turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 From NeoArk Uh. Let me re-explain. Basically the issue is in Japanese, how it's worded sounds like it can be:A) You add a book for each Spell Card both players play.OR B) You choose yourself or your opponent, and add a book based on the number of Spells used by the specific player. It's vague due to how Japanese handles subjects and probably need clarification due to rulings, as the way the text is worded hasn't been seen before on any card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 OCG Solemn Judgment was "Declaration of God", so this thing will probably just stay as "Divine Judgment of the Spellbooks". Or just Judgment of the Spellbooks. @LZ: Well that could be problematic @Current Card: Step 1: Let them Play this Step 2: Let then play Secrets Step 3: Chain CotH to summon Rai-Oh Step 4: ????? Step 5: Watch them cry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 OCG Solemn Judgment was "Declaration of God", so this thing will probably just stay as "Divine Judgment of the Spellbooks".Divine is a buzz word in the TCG. It'll be Judgment of the Spellbooks probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 Divine is a buzz word in the TCG. It'll be Judgment of the Spellbooks probably. They even made DIVINE and Divine-Beast official. Besides, they've been loosening up on censoring the words "heaven" and "angel" too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted January 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 That's really interesting. I wonder who many other cards need more rulings, due to the way the way are read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 They even made DIVINE and Divine-Beast official. Besides, they've been loosening up on censoring the words "heaven" and "angel" too.Old cards don't count though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 They even made DIVINE and Divine-Beast official. Besides, they've been loosening up on censoring the words "heaven" and "angel" too. Shining Angel and Horn of Heaven. Look at those new cards they didn't censor. Old cards don't count though. Zeradias isn't that old. Nor is Rosaria or Celestia. Or Divine Grace - Northwemko Divine Wind of Mist Valley, Elemental HERO Divine Neos... need I go on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted January 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 I think its fine to un- or to censor card's text. Sometimes its really random tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted January 30, 2013 Report Share Posted January 30, 2013 There is a HEAVY chance that it's either your spells OR your opponent's spells. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted January 30, 2013 Report Share Posted January 30, 2013 There is a HEAVY chance that it's either your spells OR your opponent's spells. That wouldn't change much, really. Card would still be nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted January 30, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2013 That wouldn't change much, really. Card would still be nuts. Yep. Dark Worlds, 6Spams, are archtypes that do involve heavy spells. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.