heraldry_lord Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 Number 82: Heartlandraco Rank 4 EARTH Dragon-Type Xyz Effect Monster ATK 2000 DEF 1500 2 Level 4 monsters While you control a face-up Spell Card, this card cannot be targeted for an attack. Once per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; this card can attack your opponent directly, but other monsters cannot attack during this turn. http://ygorganization.com/premium-pack-16-spoiler/ So, basically, while you have a Continuous, Equip or Field Spell, you can't attack this, and his other effect makes him a Rank 4 Nightmare Shark. That's neat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 It's a better Utopia in every sense except the 2500 atk, which is hardly relevant anymore when this just does that better on a quick effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 So he's nothing more than a wannabe TER? That's strangely fitting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 And now for even more reason to not use Utopia... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 Obvious Crystal Beast support which will make them tier 1 Is there any time you would want to use this on your turn? Maybe against like Volcanic Doomfire but then you would probably just go into like Diamond Wolf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 So...Number 82 has nothing to do with its manga effect? Dragon Shield says hi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 So they changed entirely, huh. Good for stalling, me no liking it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heraldry_lord Posted December 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 I updated the OP. According to the latest Org translation, 82 is a direct attacker like Number 47: Nightmare Shark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 Worse than Gagaga Cowboy because less versatile and BP dependent. Next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 I updated the OP. According to the latest Org translation, 82 is a direct attacker like Number 47: Nightmare Shark. It is indeed, somehow I missed that line. It's insanely good now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 It is indeed, somehow I missed that line. It's insanely good now. The detach isn't either player's turn according to the op. It's shit. It would be mediocre like Nightmare Shark, but 47's in a rank that's not as supported at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heraldry_lord Posted December 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 The detach isn't either player's turn according to the op. It's shit. It would be mediocre like Nightmare Shark, but 47's in a rank that's not as supported at all. IMO, I'm fine with the most recent Numbers (not counting Chaos Numbers) we've been getting. They aren't COMPLETE ****, but they're not great either. Just average. Given what we've already gotten, especially in Rank 4, I can't ask for much more than that tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 The detach isn't either player's turn according to the op. It's shit. It would be mediocre like Nightmare Shark, but 47's in a rank that's not as supported at all. Whoops, my brain processed them as two separate effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 So...Number 82 has nothing to do with its manga effect? Dragon Shield says hi. Though Battle Damage becomes an issue with Dragon Shield. Although I guess a single for the direct attack, then Dragon Shield for an extreme stall sound pretty neat to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted December 22, 2013 Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 This might be an interesting tech into Fire Fists, or any deck revolving around a Field Spell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.