I Hate Snatch Steal Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 I'm aware that Dragon rulers + super rejuvination got card destruction banned but now that the rulers are dead and buried and super rejuvination is banned, can card destruction come back or am I missing something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Card Destruction is purely winmoar and the only decks that would benefit from it are Droolers and Dark Worlds. It's banned for the same reasons Gateway and Return are banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 0. It's an F/OTK card that does nothing but support degenerate decks. It's Empty Jar, Dark World, etc. Nothing good for the game ever uses it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Since it's inherently a -1, no deck will play it unless they either want to work through their deck fast, work through your deck fast, or they have a mechanic that can change the -1 to something positive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 It's a card I wouldn't mind at 1, although it being at 0 is justified. DWs are crap anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Too many cards would need to be banned for it to come back. All it really does is promote OTK-ing anyway so I have no problem with it at zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Hate Snatch Steal Posted December 23, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 I see, thanks everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hounds Of Anubis Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Should be at 1 so DWs have an actual win condition again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Should be at 1 so DWs have an actual win condition again.Says YCM's resident DW player... Heh.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted December 26, 2013 Report Share Posted December 26, 2013 Should be at 1 so DWs have an actual win condition again. heh. But seriously, Card Destruction should be at -1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiagirl Posted December 26, 2013 Report Share Posted December 26, 2013 It wouldn't break the game at 1. It'd probably be just fine there since Rulers got nerfed. But it's one of those cards that once it hits the banlist it's unlikely to come off, kind of like how Magician of Faith was for a long time. tl;dr It'd be perfectly fine at one. And no, I don't use Dark Worlds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted December 31, 2013 Report Share Posted December 31, 2013 Card Destruction is purely winmoar and the only decks that would benefit from it are Droolers and Dark Worlds. It's banned for the same reasons Gateway and Return are banned. Fableds say Hi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted January 1, 2014 Report Share Posted January 1, 2014 Fableds say Hi. Card Destruction is mediocre to bad in Fableds depending on the format and accessible cards. You run too many cards you don't wanna ditch, and you really just wanna ditch with Kushano and Chawa, so no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.