Neutrality Man Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 So, this classic-era card completely and utterly shits all over the Pendulum mechanic. http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-Spell_Fragrance Both players must Set Spell Cards before activating them, and cannot activate them until their next turn. As for why, I'll just let CapitalG tell that, since he's how I found out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrAhDptT9gE [spoiler='In case the video failed'] Pendulums in the Pendulum Zones count as Spells. Anti-Spell Fragrance forces you to Set a Spell before it can activate. Pendulums cannot be played in the P-Zone face-down. Ergo, Anti-Spell Fragrance totally locks out any Pendulum plays. [/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Some guy once told me this card didn't exist. And that it and Sigmorph created an Illegal Gamestate. I laughed that night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neutrality Man Posted March 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Some guy once told me this card didn't exist. And that it and Sigmorph created an Illegal Gamestate. I laughed that night. You mean Dark Simorgh? I remember you posting that. Good LOLs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunn O))) Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Some guy once told me this card didn't exist. And that it and Sigmorph created an Illegal Gamestate. I laughed that night. Was told the same thing on DN, by some troll named ssjgogeta1992 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 For once a card kills a summon mechanic released instead of the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultravires Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 With the Artifact engine around still, this is a non-issue even post-DUEA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 ITV: Pendjulum Summon. Pendjulum. Pend. Jew. Lum. Some. Mun. This makes me feel uncomftrouble for some reason. OT: I would like for them to make some rule that they can activate Pendulums because they aren't Spells until they hit the zone or something like that. For some reason, I feel like that the people who complain about this card's synergy with Dark Simorgh being too stronk will pressure them to just ban this. It's not really a bad move though, since shutting down your opponent's entire backrow is pretty dumb and only exists still because it doesn't do anything relevant. But still, just rule that ASF doesn't stop the Pendjulum stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Pretty sure it'll be ruled in a way that it does not, in fact, shut down Pendulums, given that it is impossible to set Pendulum Spells. Would probably just get errata'd to say so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Because why would they get banned for shutting down a crappy mechanic? Vanity's shuts down a main mechanic and it isn't banned *shot* I like this card. It was a total jerk to fight Crow when he had it in TF5/6 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Was told the same thing on DN, by some troll named ssjgogeta1992*head-desk*THAT guy?Ugh. For once a card kills a summon mechanic released instead of the other way around.That would be a first. Pretty sure it'll be ruled in a way that it does not, in fact, shut down Pendulums, given that it is impossible to set Pendulum Spells. Would probably just get errata'd to say so.I dunno' Black. It might be Xyzs all over again, in the sense that they run off made-up lazy-as-fu.ck rules, and then get "fixed" after like the first 2-3 months(Pardon my language, of course) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 It better not get banned. Just ordered two in anticipation for Starduston's arrival in the TCG. It might get hit if I wreck enough faces with that, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 It better not get banned. Just ordered two in anticipation for Starduston's arrival in the TCG. It might get hit if I wreck enough faces with that, though. I said the same thing about Sixth Sense look where I am now Nah this really won't get a ban. If you can tell me you can get away with not running spells then most of the time you take the hit as hard as the opponent. Most of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 I dunno' Black. It might be Xyzs all over again, in the sense that they run off made-up lazy-as-fu.ck rules, and then get "fixed" after like the first 2-3 months (Pardon my language, of course) I don't know. When Xyz's were first introduced, I was pretty sure it was already explained in the OCG that their materials aren't considered to be on the field, it was just a bad ruling in the TCG that they weren't for a time. I might be misremembering, though. I was taking another break around that time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 I don't know. When Xyz's were first introduced, I was pretty sure it was already explained in the OCG that their materials aren't considered to be on the field, it was just a bad ruling in the TCG that they weren't for a time. I might be misremembering, though. I was taking another break around that time. Bad ruling? Man Sangan was the shite though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 I said the same thing about Sixth Sense look where I am now Nah this really won't get a ban. If you can tell me you can get away with not running spells then most of the time you take the hit as hard as the opponent. Most of the time. The main thing is, with Dustons, once we get Staruduston we dont really need the speed of activating our spells the turn we draw them. Most often by the time i'm ready to flip fragrance, I have essential control of the gamestate and just need the Opti-Camo to end it. Thus, I can stand to wait a turn. (Also, for random records, I bought sixth sense as well, knowing it would be banned. Powered up my Chaos Dragons for the regionals, though :D) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Can you not post CapitalG videos please? I don't want AIDS. thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Can you not post CapitalG videos please? I don't want AIDS. thanks. The title of the video alone made me agree with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neochu-H Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 well i guess i better run crap i don't want to run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 I forsee an errata done before a ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 Hmm... I'm now tempted to try this on YGOPro and see if that actually is the case. (Obviously not an official ruling, but trolling the AI is fun.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 this is amazing side card in Harpies, and if you use harpies and dont side this then youre bad at the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 this is amazing side card in Harpies, and if you use harpies and dont side this then youre bad at the game It certainly slows spellbooks down a bit, unless they get Priestess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 It certainly slows spellbooks down a bit, unless they get Priestess. it shuts them down as they wont be able to use their shit since youll pop stuff with hunting ground priestess is a problem but usually if you use this early game the only way to get spellbooks in grave is on 2nd turn and by then you can setup cards to stop their field etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 it shuts them down as they wont be able to use their s*** since youll pop stuff with hunting ground priestess is a problem but usually if you use this early game the only way to get spellbooks in grave is on 2nd turn and by then you can setup cards to stop their field etc. They can also banish from the hand for Priestess, but yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted March 25, 2014 Report Share Posted March 25, 2014 I forsee an errata done before a ban. There's no need for an errata, given that Pendulum cards are not treated as a Spell Card of any kind. If anything, a ruling that mentions that it doesn't affect Pendulums since they are not Spells etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.