Jump to content

Number 103: Ragna Zero


Recommended Posts

sAzbho2.jpg

 

2 Level 4 monsters
Once per turn, during either player's turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card, then target 1 face-up Attack Position monster your opponent controls whose current ATK is different from its original ATK; destroy it, and if you do, draw 1 card.

 

Whilst I'm glad that it's still a Rare, I think it would've looked nice in Super, discuss?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dat Starduston

 

OT: I'm also glad it is a rare simply because it is a good generic R4 and it is a nice change from the last set where Exicton and 101, both amazing generic R4s were really expensive (and still are). It makes it easier for people with less money (including me) to build a good extra deck.

 

As for it's effect, it's kinda like Overworked in Xyz form and is pretty good vs FF. The draw effect is just icing on the cake. Although it is very good it is also very situational so I won't end up running it in many decks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OT: I'm also glad it is a rare simply because it is a good generic R4 and it is a nice change from the last set where Exicton and 101, both amazing generic R4s were really expensive (and still are). It makes it easier for people with less money (including me) to build a good extra deck.

I'm hoping Caingorgon (also a good generic R4) remains a Super, but I get the feeling it'll become a Secret which will be a shame, but I wouldn't be surprised nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ragna is taking over this thread.

 

It stops Bujins primarily, since they now have 7 Honest. The draw is just icing on the cake.

Pretty sure this can't activate during damage calculation, so it wouldn't work with Crane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit more interested in the fact Starduston didn't become Star Duston. Afterall, house was originally Houseduston.

Anyway, I really like this card as well as C103, but still a bit too impractical to be staple. Still, id add it in decks I have room for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit more interested in the fact Starduston didn't become Star Duston. Afterall, house was originally Houseduston.

Anyway, I really like this card as well as C103, but still a bit too impractical to be staple. Still, id add it in decks I have room for it.

 

Is Starduston a "Stardust" card? If so, that's why. The TCG has that card that works with "Stardust" monsters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely owns fire fists. 

Also against Madolches and a Chateau you can't get rid of, at least you plus and not just your opponent. 

I'm also glad its rare, it's all good and well saying the card would look nice as a super, but then surely every card in the game looks nicer as a holo? 

And my wallet is happier this way anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...