heraldry_lord Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Number F0: Future Hope [Rank 0/LIGHT/Warrior/Xyz/Effect/ATK 0/DEF 0] 2 Xyz Monsters Cannot be destroyed by battle, also you take no battle damage from attacks involving this card. If this card battled an opponent's monster, at the end of the Damage Step: Take control of that monster until the end of the Battle Phase. During either player's turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card, then activate 1 of these effects: ● This card cannot be destroyed by battle or by card effects. ● You take no effect damage. There are rumours that this card will be one of the OCG exclusives in Next Challengers, but you can ignore that and instead simply discuss how viable this card would be if it were released as-is. Also it'd be funny to have a Rank 0 Xyz, just like it'd be funny to have a Rank 13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 I can see this being made as it is but I guess it will either be rank 1 or 4 requiring 5 Lv 1 or 4 Monsters and state that it can also be summoned using 2 Xyz Monsters of the same rank to Xyz Summon this card (that's if the rumours are true that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Well, this is one way for Konami to show their moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 If it works like Ranking Up you can do 101 and a used something else to get this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZnvu7dyVCw[/media] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Source of this rumor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Source of this rumor?It's on NeoArk in Ark's rumor mill.Along with info about the new Machina, new HERO, and other such stuff in NECH.The HERO is an OCG Exclusive but the Machina isn't.ANDThe new Ghostrick Xyz that looks like an angel is an OCG Exclusive Alternate Win Condition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 It's on NeoArk in Ark's rumor mill. Along with info about the new Machina, new HERO, and other such stuff in NECH. The HERO is an OCG Exclusive but the Machina isn't. AND The new Ghostrick Xyz that looks like an angel is an OCG Exclusive Alternate Win Condition Ooooo. Do tell. This sounds interesting. Also, I have to ask. Any words of Number 5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 So... Assuming the rumors are true and this card actually exists, I wouldn't doubt it if they utterly wreck this card.IE, allow it to die in battle/etc, control only shifts after Battle Phase, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 I'd only remove the "Cannot be destroyed by battle" part. Otherwise, it's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Why does it even need to not be destroyed by battle regularly? ._.It's a -4 to summon at best (on paper at least, given it's 2 -1 Xyz put together, bar any advantage they create/how they were made) for a monster that steals a monster in order to attack with it.Bar El-Shaddoll Fusion and Mask Change Second this isn't even an issue, and both of those are Attribute dependent. And then they can just change it so that it doesn't have the ability to do even that on the off chance that's too much.If I wanna make a Marshmallon that can double as a "beater" out of 4 technical cards of advantage, I fail to see the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted June 23, 2014 Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 It's a -1 if you make it with 2 WATER monsters that you turn into Bahamut Shark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted June 23, 2014 Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 It's a -1 if you make it with 2 WATER monsters that you turn into Bahamut Shark. And if I make it with Satella's it's going to be a +1 since I go plus 1 on each of the composite Xyz. Individual situations don't change that on paper it is a -3 as Blac was saying. And thus it's pretty weak as it is now. Hell it could do with a buff more than any nerf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 23, 2014 Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 And if I make it with Satella's it's going to be a +1 since I go plus 1 on each of the composite Xyz. Individual situations don't change that on paper it is a -3 as Blac was saying. And thus it's pretty weak as it is now. Hell it could do with a buff more than any nerf. The point is to try and make it in ways that don't net you too less advantage. On paper, Quasar's a -5, so people use it in decks that can make it reliably at a +0, sometimes plussing even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted June 23, 2014 Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 The point is to try and make it in ways that don't net you too less advantage. On paper, Quasar's a -5, so people use it in decks that can make it reliably at a +0, sometimes plussing even more. Even then, this card is underwhelming. Hell if you make 2 Xyz whilst breaking even or better, I'd keep the two who will probably be better than this thing the vast majority of the time. Since you'll probably kill the thing you steal with this for a Battle phase instead which is far better in the long term. And as you are aware, this is nothing like Quasar. Quasar is worth investing a tonne of resources on since short of a Solemn or Horn you will be most likely be draining a card from the opponents board, and then killing something. Netting you even more immediate advantage. I understood what the point was. This cards just overwhelmingly meh even with that in consideration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.