Might be a meaningless question but where's the exact boundary?
In case you make a Harry Potter Character /inspired by card> > > Pop Culture.
In case you make a Bible Character /inspired by card> > > Probably RC.
What's the actual difference? is it the time of the character's life? is it the kind of form of literature it's in? is it to what extent is the card based on the character? What makes Ella Fitzgerald less RC worthy than (**)mozart? (despite the obvious gap in genius, both are cultural phenomenon, both were real personas)
(**)mozart as in Melodious Mozarta. as seen in the official game.
Imagine I come up with an Ella F. card artwork that's Yu-Gi-Oh perfect, add a little flavour. that's still Pop Culture, isn't it?
/#thinking too much
Might sound like an idiot I'm not trolling I swear :o
Question
Marco Polo
wear the philosophical hat guys,
Might be a meaningless question but where's the exact boundary?
In case you make a Harry Potter Character /inspired by card> > > Pop Culture.
In case you make a Bible Character /inspired by card> > > Probably RC.
What's the actual difference? is it the time of the character's life? is it the kind of form of literature it's in? is it to what extent is the card based on the character? What makes Ella Fitzgerald less RC worthy than (**)mozart? (despite the obvious gap in genius, both are cultural phenomenon, both were real personas)
(**)mozart as in Melodious Mozarta. as seen in the official game.
Imagine I come up with an Ella F. card artwork that's Yu-Gi-Oh perfect, add a little flavour. that's still Pop Culture, isn't it?
/#thinking too much
Might sound like an idiot I'm not trolling I swear :o
Link to comment
Share on other sites
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.