mshends Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 Entermage Flame Eater Level 4 FIRE Spellcaster-Type Effect Monster ATK 1200 DEF 1600 (1) When an effect that would inflict damage to you is activated: You can Special Summon this card from your hand, and if you do, you take no damage from that effect. You cannot Special Summon monsters, except "Entermage" monsters for the rest of this turn. If summoned this way, banish this card when it leaves the field. (2) If this card is Normal or Special Summoned: Inflict 500 damage to both players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 So, they're kind of like D/D in that you are trying to take damage by your own effects to make them work? That's odd, but I guess that it makes them a little more playable. I like how this works with Trick Box, since the effect is mandatory, so you will be able to activate effects that activate when your opponent inflict effect damage to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 So... It kept the original effect, but also includes an effect that can potentially trigger other copies? Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 I really can't get over that art. It's so adorkable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 I think YouTube's comment section could use some Flame Eaters. Entermages. May be able to use Dark Snake Syndomre, since it deals damage every turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 I think YouTube's comment section could use some Flame Eaters. Entermages. May be able to use Dark Snake Syndomre, since it deals damage every turn. That actually sounds like a frighteningly good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 I... Don't like the design. At all. It's not broken, unfair, or anything like that, but... It's an anti-burn card. That has a mandatory burn payment. I get that it's to feed into more copies and the like, but it should at least be optional. An anti-burn card should NOT have the potential to kill you like this. It's just incoherent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 I... Don't like the design. At all. It's not broken, unfair, or anything like that, but... It's an anti-burn card. That has a mandatory burn payment. I get that it's to feed into more copies and the like, but it should at least be optional. An anti-burn card should NOT have the potential to kill you like this. It's just incoherent. Fire eating is actually a very dangerour trick, with lots of potential for injury and even death. It makes sense flavour-wise that there's risk involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 Fire eating is actually a very dangerour trick, with lots of potential for injury and even death. It makes sense flavour-wise that there's risk involved.I get it as a flavor design, but as a game design it doesn't make a lot of sense, given that it's supposed to SAVE you .~. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 Fire eating is actually a very dangerour trick, with lots of potential for injury and even death. It makes sense flavour-wise that there's risk involved. Black means the multi burn part. It can already do the trick to eat the fire, but shouldn't go and burn itself; makes it look inexperienced and scrubby. ....aside from the fact it helps to play other copies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 Black means the multi burn part. It can already do the trick to eat the fire, but shouldn't go and burn itself; makes it look inexperienced and scrubby. ....aside from the fact it helps to play other copies. That second bit is exactly the reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vla1ne Posted March 14, 2015 Report Share Posted March 14, 2015 so essentially, no matter how this thing is summoned, even if you summon more than one in a chain, you're going to take at least 500 damage. that's somewhat funny actually.also, does the art remind anybody else of bite bug? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted March 14, 2015 Report Share Posted March 14, 2015 I have a feeling aegis of gaia is going to fit in this deck decently well. Also like the dark snake syndrome idea. You could also use burning land for a slower, less all-consuming continuous source of burn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vla1ne Posted March 14, 2015 Report Share Posted March 14, 2015 I have a feeling aegis of gaia is going to fit in this deck decently well. Also like the dark snake syndrome idea. You could also use burning land for a slower, less all-consuming continuous source of burn.Prime material dragon might probably have a field day in this deck as well considering the burning effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.