Jump to content

Zimbabwe Lion Illegally Hunted By Minnesota Dentist


.Rai

Recommended Posts

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/cecil-the-lion

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3177303/PICTURED-American-dentist-passion-hunting-killed-Cecil-Lion-bow-arrow-Zimbabwe.html

 

tl;dr Dentist with known history of sports hunting (and a previous indictment related to it) pays $50,000 to hunt a lion (called Cecil, popular with the tourists and locals, and part of a Cambridge research project). Lion is illegally baited by his guides outside of its reserve, where hunting isn't allowed, and shot once with a bow, which doesn't kill. Comes back the next day to shoot it. Claims he believed that the entire operation was legal and fully licensed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is sickening that someone would do this; especially with a research helper that people love, then beheads him for a trophy.
Of course, he already got into trouble for shooting a bear where he wasn't supposed to.
 
Needless to say, a lot of people are furious about it + essentially want him dead or to suffer horribly (i.e. get shipped to Middle East and have ISIS do the same thing to him).
While yes, I can understand that they are abhorred by what happened, it is rather sickening what people want this guy to be subjected to.
 
Here's one of them (quoted from the second article)
 

'Nothing in this world would give me greater pleasure than to see your head mounted on a wall, your carcass defiled, degraded and paraded as you did to Cecil and near countless other animals,'

 
That in mind, the guides should've probably known that said lion was a popular one, and part of a study, and told him "don't shoot this one".
Additionally, know where they were not supposed to be hunting; the article did say that they were in a reserve somewhere.

 

However, the dentist should've known better since this isn't the first time he got busted for illegal hunting.

The fact this was a local icon makes it worse.

 

-----------

In a nutshell, Cambridge lost a research subject for studying lions in the wild, Africa lost one of their prized animals and his cubs now face the possibility of death if something goes on and this guy is hiding away somewhere.

 

That, and he makes America look bad now since he killed a local animal favorite overseas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dat headline.

 

 

But yeah, this should obviously result in some heavy legal repercussions and maybe some new legislation to make this more explicitly illegal.  

 

But that it's it.  The self righteous circlejerk that follows things like this makes me want to gag. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think legislating this is tricky. Anti-poaching laws have been historically quite difficult to maintain.

 

I just think that was just an incredible waste of money, and of life of a vulnerable species. The witch hunt over this guy is crazy unnecessary. I'd like to just see some more attention brought to conservation campaigns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Needless to say, a lot of people are furious about it + essentially want him dead or to suffer horribly (i.e. get shipped to Middle East and have ISIS do the same thing to him).

While yes, I can understand that they are abhorred by what happened, it is rather sickening what people want this guy to be subjected to.

 

Here's one of them (quoted from the second article)

 

pretty sure that the people who say sheet like that arent really serious about it, but still even then it really is unnecessary despite the fact that this guy was illegally hunting and shot a local favorite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are seriously overreacting to this. Yes someone killed a reserve's favourite lion. Yes it was illegally hunted, but sending death threats and such isn't needed. If it turns out he did indeed know about the status the lion had then some of the threats are indeed okay, but until then all we have to go off are his own words that he was told by his guides that it was okay.

 

PETA reprimanding him doesn't help either, their cause or settling any of this. If PETA want animals to be treated fairly don't ask for someone to get hanged for what could just have ended up being a terrible mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything, threatening to resort to violence is the least mature way to approach this. More importantly, it doesn't bring the Lion back to life. I mean, this guy's career is over, and because of the public often resorting to witch hunts before even been given conclusive evidence, and even after the fact that forgiveness is such a rare emotion amongst people seemingly, despite being the most logical way forward, this man probably won't be able to find another job again, not without at least having his name changed.

 

 The news uproar about this is almost as disgusting as the event itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is his office.

 

https://i.imgur.com/VwNwhDC.jpg

 

It shouldn't come as a surprise that people posted that sign on his business + other threats.

If I remember correctly, some protester put a picket sign on his lawn, calling him a killer. 

 

Even a 10-year old kid voiced her disapproval of this.

 

People are seriously overreacting to this. Yes someone killed a reserve's favourite lion. Yes it was illegally hunted, but sending death threats and such isn't needed. If it turns out he did indeed know about the status the lion had then some of the threats are indeed okay, but until then all we have to go off are his own words that he was told by his guides that it was okay.

 

PETA reprimanding him doesn't help either, their cause or settling any of this. If PETA want animals to be treated fairly don't ask for someone to get hanged for what could just have ended up being a terrible mistake.

I agree on the overreacting part.

Cecil certainly didn't deserve to die in the fashion that he did, so some degree of protests is acceptable, but crossing the line into death threats and other things is definitely not okay.

 

As for PETA, it certainly wouldn't be their first stint at reprimanding people for killing animals.

We kill animals every day for meat/food, and they should know that by now.

 

Indeed, it was a deadly mistake for him; and while there will likely be some consequences for his actions if he knowingly killed the local icon, making death threats is childish (and it'll be even more immature if some vigilantes take things into their own hands + do end up killing him).

 

I quoted an threat someone made towards him in my previous post here, so let's make things clear.

Even if you want to take "revenge" for Cecil, subjecting him to the same treatment makes you no better than the dentist in question, if not worse.

 

As Shard mentioned, Cecil isn't going to come back to us even if the dentist is found/charged, and it certainly does nothing for his children who no longer have a father to care for their well-being.

 

Would Cecil be happy that people are threatening to take extreme matters against the person who orchestrated his death in an attempt for vengeance?

Probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is his office.

 

https://i.imgur.com/VwNwhDC.jpg

 

well gee this just totally isnt in any sort of way overreacting, immature and totally unnecessary. this is just TOTALLY the absolute perfect thing to do when something like this happens.

 

 

seriously people really need to lay off a bit, its sad that he killed the local favorite but all of this craziness with protests and death threats is really just pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it turns out he did indeed know about the status the lion had then some of the threats are indeed okay, but until then all we have to go off are his own words that he was told by his guides that it was okay.

 

He bribed his guides to let him into that part of the reserve. I highly doubt the decision to kill the lion originated from the guides rather than him.

 

While no threat is justifiable, he's still scum of the earth for doing it. I feel no sympathy to him for whatever may happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He bribed his guides to let him into that part of the reserve. I highly doubt the decision to kill the lion originated from the guides rather than him.

 

While no threat is justifiable, he's still scum of the earth for doing it. I feel no sympathy to him for whatever may happen.

My bad, misread.

 

Still he doesn't deserve what he is getting. I don't agree with his actions but overall I couldn't really care less about the lion. He still is the father of two and needs to get an income so sending him death threats does hinder that. If he really did know how famous the lion was then yes he does deserve some of the threats. But until more evidence comes to light not much can happen.

 

Though I do take issue with how they went about it, leaving it for hours wounded is cruel, if you are going to kill something just kill it quickly, if you fail with the first shot, shot it again. Just cause it isn't human doesn't mean you can leave it to bleed out for hours. If it was your own animal and it was wounded, and a vet couldn't help would you leave it like that for a unnecessary amount of time before finally killing it.

 

Though at least he did kill it, heard of some stories where the hunter just leaves the prey wounded enough so it could die then leaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 "The issue is he lured a protected (collared and tracked for species preservation purposes) animal off of a reservation to shoot it, track it while it bled for 40 hours. finally to shoot it in the head, decapitate it, skin it, and leave the caracas to rot unused in the desert. All of this on top of the underlying issue that African lions will be extinct by 2050 if the rates of decline continue, which certainly won't be helped by the fact that now almost all of his 24 lion cubs will most likely die." 

 

Some guy on fb said this, and he basically took the words out of my mouth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is weird of me to say, but events like this make me wonder what would happen if we humans and the relatively few animal species we domesticate for food/pleasure/etc. were the only animals left on the planet.

 

Would we better or worse off for it?

Probably worse off due to the fact ecosystems wouldn't be able to function properly. If that wasn't a problem then it probably would be the same as it is now just with less deaths from animal transmitted diseases and attacks. It is hard to say how it could turn out but remove predatory animals form the ecosystem and you have to pay people to make sure wild grazing animals don't overpopulated the area leading to food shortage. It's the circle of life.

 

Now I want to watch Lion King.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are you comparing murder to an animal killing?

 

In reality, they're basically the same thing, just with different species.  "Murder" is the killing of someone in our own species, so it has bigger implications by default.  When you also factor in that we often have to kill other species to survive, then it makes sense we find it much easier to disregard something like this, as long as it's not a human victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...