Akira Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 The current effect reads: When this card is Special Summoned from the Graveyard, draw 2 cards. But what if it's effect were to be toned down to read: When this card is Special Summoned from the Graveyard, draw 2 cards. If you do, this card cannot be Special Summoned for the remainder of the duel. Where would it belong on the list then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitchblack64 Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 it isnt even that good of a card right now but if that were da case it would probably be in the semi list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 it'd be unlimited, i guess. If you want to run 3, you're giving up 3 deck spaces They're all dead after their first use, so you can't reborn this, daw 2, sac and return with limit reverse for another 2. You'd have to search out the next one. I guess 3 is fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 it isnt even that good of a card right now I Lol'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 Limited. The same problem Twin-Headed Behemoth has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitchblack64 Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 it isnt even that good of a card right now I Lol'd.onli problem with it is i dont want to waist a reborn card on a weak card like dat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 it isnt even that good of a card right now I Lol'd.onli problem with it is i dont want to waist a reborn card on a weak card like dat Ladies and gentlemen, I give you... ZOMBIE WORLD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 Limit Reverse & Graceful Revival ftw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitchblack64 Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 it isnt even that good of a card right now I Lol'd.onli problem with it is i dont want to waist a reborn card on a weak card like dat Ladies and gentlemen' date=' I give you... ZOMBIE WORLD![/quote']i got that deck but it runs out of cards to fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 ]onli problem with it is i dont want to waist a reborn card on a weak card like dat i got that deck but it runs out of cards to fast I give. You really know your stuff. Darn you're good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 Limited. The same problem Twin-Headed Behemoth has. what problem is that? like " are you sure it didn't come back already?" problem, or another one I don't know of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 it isnt even that good of a card right now I Lol'd.onli problem with it is i dont want to waist a reborn card on a weak card like dat Ladies and gentlemen' date=' I give you... ZOMBIE WORLD![/quote']i got that deck but it runs out of cards to fastHow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Limited. The same problem Twin-Headed Behemoth has. what problem is that? like " are you sure it didn't come back already?" problem' date=' or another one I don't know of?[/quote'] The one where the card is constructed so clumsily that the game mechanics will not permit it to be legal at anything higher than 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Here's a counter-query: What if Disk, current effect and all, isn't really all that banworthy?On topic, though: It will then join the company of Twin-Headed Behemoth, that of havin' an effect that no amount of rulings can fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Here's a counter-query: What if Disk' date=' current effect and all, isn't really all that banworthy?[hr'] Here's a counter to your counter-query.There's no "ifs" about it. It's banworthy. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Here's a counter-query: What if Disk' date=' current effect and all, isn't really all that banworthy?[hr'] Here's a counter to your counter-query.There's no "ifs" about it. It's banworthy. Period. It isn't. It only appears to be banworthy because of our instant appreciation that "Disk = PoG! OHNOESBANN!!!" which is as far from the truth as it gets. Without banworthy win conditions and cards, Disk is merely a weenie that needs infrastructure to achieve its effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 it isnt even that good of a card right now I Lol'd.onli problem with it is i dont want to waist a reborn card on a weak card like dat ^This person has obviously not looked at Disk's effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 it isnt even that good of a card right now I Lol'd.onli problem with it is i dont want to waist a reborn card on a weak card like dat LAWL. You have no idea how awesome Disk Commander is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 about this post... i'm not sure if is "meh" or "doh"... and told before... limited... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 I would say something along the lines of "When this card is Special Summoned, Draw 2 cards. This monster is then removed from play fior the remainder of the Duel" or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 ^ Then it's also limited; card design-wise, a waste of ink and time. And it isn't as if Disk is banworthy, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 ^ Then it's also limited; card design-wise' date=' a waste of ink and time. And it isn't as if Disk is banworthy, anyway.[/quote'] The only problem is the banworthy win conditions and generic revival. Ban them and then there's no reason for Disk Commander to be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uchiha Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 UnlimitedSerious, NO limit to it. If you are stupid enough to run 3, be a dumb@$$ and waste Deck space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 UnlimitedSerious' date=' NO limit to it. If you are stupid enough to run 3, be a dumb@$$ and waste Deck space.[/quote'] I probably still wouldnt run 3 if it were Unlimited. Besides, what broken win condition could you possibly draw into on a good ban list. Remember, this ban list is absolutely horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.