El Majishan Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 Well we all know Breaker's effect. With the new List everyone was all: "OMG BREAKER AT 3 IS SO BROKEN!!!" Well today was my locals and Breaker didn't really make much of a difference. When ever a Breaker was summoned the usually response was Bottomless, Book of Moon, Threatening Roar, Torrential Tribute or some other chainable. So I say this; While Breaker is a good card his only place in this Format is in the side deck or mained in Endymion Builds. Discuss your point of view Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 I wouldn't run 3 Breaker in the first place IMO Too me its overkill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 The point is that if cards like breaker were gone, all the traps wouldn't have to be chainable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted September 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 I wouldn't run 3 Breaker in the first place IMO Too me its overkill I mained 2 in my build today' date=' it didn't do squat. The only thing I see him hitting is MF. Other than that he's only good side deck material when playing against the random Oppression build or being all Godly in Endymion.[hr']The point is that if cards like breaker were gone' date=' all the traps wouldn't have to be chainable.[/quote'] But sadly they all are, so Breaker is all like "I'm a really cool dude, but I have nothing to blow up T_T" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 still its effect starts it out as a 1900 beatstick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 still its effect starts it out as a 1900 beatstick Yes, because everybody runs Breaker because he's a beatstick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 The point is that if cards like breaker were gone' date=' all the traps wouldn't have to be chainable.[/quote'] But sadly they all are,The ones that see competitive use are mostly chainable, but many exist that aren't. Genzo was saying that being chainable wouldn't be such a big deal if cards like Breaker that easily destroy S/T cards were gone. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 As you can see, Crab Helmet has coined a term so awesome that everyone else has no choice but to use it. I for one think it's because people haven't had enough time to adjust to the current format. It's too early to judge how much of an impact Breaker at 3 makes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 I wouldn't run 3 Breaker in the first place IMO Too me its overkill What about if its a Citidel build? Breaker would efectivley(key word) become a walking Harpie's Feather duster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 I run 3 Breaker in Endymion. He has a cameo occasionally in other decks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 yeah, he's only good in my deck, because they know they don't dare waste it on breaker. they need to save it for exemplar. but breaker does clear the field of problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 ITT: People don't understand that an MST with legs is a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesirson Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 Endymion + Breaker = K.O! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 ITT: People don't understand that an MST with legs is a problem. to inform you, it isn't that he isn't a problem, it's that he isn't as broken as people thought at 3 outside of endymion. and endymion's job is to break spell counter using cards. so it isn't breaker that is the problem. it's endymion, and it's only job os to help these cards, meaning that it is another blackwing case, where the seperate effects are not broken by themselves, but together they are way stronger than expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 ITT: Endiymon, Endiymon, Endiymon, ENDIYMON!!! With no good arguments. On-topic: Counterability =/= Not brokenness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesirson Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 You spelled Endymion wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 ITT: Endiymon' date=' Endiymon, Endiymon, ENDIYMON!!! With no good arguments. [/quote'] so its not just me whos fed up with it then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 ITT: Endiymon' date=' Endiymon, Endiymon, ENDIYMON!!! With no good arguments. On-topic: Counterability =/= Not brokenness.[/quote'] I only said that the card works together with it very well.the thing is, that's Endymion's job. that's all. there's no real arguements there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 You spelled Endymion wrong. I was thinking about that guy from Sailor Moon. <_< ... But I think I misspelled it then too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 Oh wow. One lolocal. I guess that proves everything about anything, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tekkaman01 Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 lol for judging the meta by locals! On a side note, does any one have any final countdowns? I really need some sense it is the top deck in this meta. I figured it out because some won one with it at locals.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 What locals are you guys going to? At mine the deck that wins is almost always the same decks that top at jumps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Megacyber Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 I run 2 breakers.It is great, but i'll never use 3. (Unless it is in a endymion deck) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Gideon. Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Maybe unlimiting breaker is the first step of banning heavy storm .. anyways, I didn't see any difference of making him @ 3 untill now.people are still using 1 or 2 at maximum he MAY become a problem in Endy Decks, other than that, he is just an 1600/1900 beatsetick. Easily raped by monarchs 8) Opp: I summon breaker and break your face-down TrapYou: Damn you destroyed my Infinite Dismissal ! <(( Continuous Trap card, you know, everyone rely on Con Traps these days ))Opp: I attack you with my deadly 1600 breaker !You: whatever, thanx for breaking my Trap, Treeborn show yourself, Summon monarch ..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Endymion sucks. Breaker is not broken. And if your opponent manages to summon breaker while endymoin has multiple counters and you have more than 1 spell or trap set and that you have nothing to deal with breaker you deserve to lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.