[DISC] Snipe Hunter

[Manjoume Thunder]

 

Discuss playbility and place on the banlist.

[Jericho]

Deserves to be limited, if not banned. Its level 4, tomato-able, and is a 2/3 of the time one for one destruction that can be used multiple times per turn.

[Master Chief13]

i like the card but it is a bit OPed i say it should be at least limited

[Crow™]

I <3 him, and I think 1 is fair.

Off: What's a Snipe?

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

I hate luck-reliant cards. It ruins the skill factor of the game.

 

I <3 him' date=' and I think 1 is fair.

Off: What's a Snipe?

[/quote']

 

BOOM HEADSHOT

[Jericho]

I <3 him' date=' and I think 1 is fair.

Off: What's a Snipe?

[/quote']

 

A snipe is a bird. On a side note, the term Sniper, as in a sharpshooter, comes from the fact that sharpshooters in the US Military would practice their marksmanship on snipes.

[-Berserker-]

I'll use this when I obtain some Roaring Fiends. I already discovered this doesn't work with dark world.s.

[Flame Dragon]

Goes to 0. It is much to easy to destroy your opponent's whole field with this.

 

Also why should he go to 1? What about changes about him at one?

[Thomas★Zero]

Snipe Hunter: Shhhhhhh am hunting Kuribbits.

Winged Kuriboh: Ehhh wats up doc *eats sugar cube*

Snipe hunter: am a hunting u and a sniping u know.

Winged Kuriboh: *reveals Devine Warth*

Snipe Hunter: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

 

lol sorry couldn't resist XD

[Darkest Hour]

He should be at 3.

[Jericho]

He should be at 3.

 

You should be at 0.

[Exyst]

Deserves to be limited' date=' if not banned. Its level 4, tomato-able, and is a 2/3 of the time one for one destruction that can be used multiple times per turn.

[/quote']

 

lrn2maths. It's 2/6=1/3

 

Also, I once had a funked up idea of using the discards for DAD/Creator/RDD food

[Jericho]

Deserves to be limited' date=' if not banned. Its level 4, tomato-able, and is a 2/3 of the time one for one destruction that can be used multiple times per turn.

[/quote']

 

lrn2maths. It's 2/6=1/3

 

Also, I once had a f***ed up idea of using the discards for DAD/Creator/RDD food

 

Ok. Lets look at this. A die has the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. The effect works if you roll anything that is not 1 or 6. That leave 4 of the 6 numbers. 4/6=2/3.

[ihop]

Should be at 1. It's a way downgraded version of Tribe-Infecting Virus.

[Exyst]

Deserves to be limited' date=' if not banned. Its level 4, tomato-able, and is a 2/3 of the time one for one destruction that can be used multiple times per turn.

[/quote']

 

lrn2maths. It's 2/6=1/3

 

Also, I once had a f***ed up idea of using the discards for DAD/Creator/RDD food

 

Ok. Lets look at this. A die has the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. The effect works if you roll anything that is not 1 or 6. That leave 4 of the 6 numbers. 4/6=2/3.

 

I was looking at it worngly. FUUUUU

[That Fat Guy]

if it was 1/3, or even once per turn, it would be perfectly balanced.

 

[/troll]

[cerberus21]

He should be at 3.

 

You should be at 0.

 

LOL. He should be at 1

 

@pika:By that logic, anything that isn't at 3 should be at 0.

[Alexis Rhodes]

the effect is maybe a bit overpowerd but if you play it it can do some real damage :)

 

voted for 1 in deck :)

[Space Ranger Gold]

I think his effect should be any even number, or something like that, then we could limit him

[.:pyramid:.]

this is not a game winning or game changing card (debatable on second point but that my veiw), the only thing that is able to abuse this currently is ... night assailant if it wasnt limited, but it is.

i know it can be used multiple time but, most of the time i find that because of the dice role that if i waste one card on destroying it ill be reluctant on using another card to fule its effect because most of the time its not worth it to overtend in the longrun of the match (by longrun i mean over the course of the duel) and .in the shortrun your options are more limited because you have wasted card advantage

[Xazeon]

Needs to be at 1. If Konami gets dumber, they will Semi this.

[VolTama]

Needs to be at 1. If Konami gets dumber' date=' they will Semi this.

[/quote']

 

This.

 

Also, why is a common reprinted as an LE?

[Flame Dragon]

@pika:By that logic' date=' anything that isn't at 3 should be at 0.

[/quote']

Um unless Pika deleted her post she hasn't posted here. That or I'm blind.

 

But yes, side from a handful of cards if a card isn't at 3 it should be at 0.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

@pika:By that logic' date=' anything that isn't at 3 should be at 0.

[/quote']

Um unless Pika deleted her post she hasn't posted here. That or I'm blind.

 

But yes, side from a handful of cards if a card isn't at 3 it should be at 0.

 

The funny thing is, the 3/0 system puts Night Assailent as 1 because the list doesn't go "all semis and limited are banned, ROFL!!!" it takes out the combos. They aren't limiting Night Assailent, they are eliminating the second Night Assailient, so it's at 1. Same would go with Dewloren. The combo only works with 3, so you would take out the third and it would go to 2.

 

The list doesn't limit and semi-limit because of overpoweredness, it removes the number of cards that make an overpowered combo possible, or so I've gathered. If I'm wrong, may I be shot, buried, and laughed at by all 3/0 people D:

[Flame Dragon]

@pika:By that logic' date=' anything that isn't at 3 should be at 0.

[/quote']

Um unless Pika deleted her post she hasn't posted here. That or I'm blind.

 

But yes, side from a handful of cards if a card isn't at 3 it should be at 0.

 

The funny thing is, the 3/0 system puts Night Assailent as 1 because the list doesn't go "all semis and limited are banned, ROFL!!!" it takes out the combos. They aren't limiting Night Assailent, they are eliminating the second Night Assailient, so it's at 1. Same would go with Dewloren. The combo only works with 3, so you would take out the third and it would go to 2.

 

The list doesn't limit and semi-limit because of overpoweredness, it removes the number of cards that make an overpowered combo possible, or so I've gathered. If I'm wrong, may I be shot, buried, and laughed at by all 3/0 people D:

No, for the most part the cards on a 3/0 banlist are their because they are simply ridiculous. DAD, and JD are perfect examples. They aren't used any combo they are simply bad for the game. Yes their are cards like BUTTERFLY DAGGER – ELMA or CARD TROOPER that are only on the lists because of combos, but those are few in number.