Bringerofcake Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 Change all face-up Synchro Monsters on the field to Defense Position. During the End Phase' date=' return all face-up Synchro Monsters to the Extra Deck.[/quote'] Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 Pretty Aweful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 kthx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 kthx Except that this is CED for Synchros, potentially x5. I think it may be a decent side tech against decks that rely completely on their Synchros. Yes, there are a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 Being a quick play makes it nice. Too bad it doesn't negate effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 A good option to side? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 Chain to Brio like a boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 .....Why is it Konami printed like a whole 3 anti-Fusion cards, about 2 anti-Ritural cards, and then ovar nine thousaaand anti-Synchro cards. Me thinks Konami secretly dislikes the Synchro Concept, while at the same time, keeps printing more of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 I think they hear people complain about them being broken so they are making "easy" ways counter them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 .....Why is it Konami printed like a whole 3 anti-Fusion cards' date=' about 2 anti-Ritural cards, and then ovar nine thousaaand anti-Synchro cards. Me thinks Konami secretly dislikes the Synchro Concept, while at the same time, keeps printing more of them.[/quote'] synchros are the best cards in the game. So I guess Konami wanted to make a bunch of counters so they don't have to use the ban list or something. Too bad most of those cards are too situational and outclassed by good old staples and decent side decking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 I actually rather like this one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 This is a decent card but I'd still personally rather just completely negate the summon of a Synchro outright since this doesn't stop their effects from being used. I do like that it effects all Synchros however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost-O Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 I doubt I would heavily main this, but I'd have it as a Side Deck option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 Activate during Main Phase 2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted May 1, 2010 Report Share Posted May 1, 2010 .....Why is it Konami printed like a whole 3 anti-Fusion cards' date=' about 2 anti-Ritural cards, and then ovar nine thousaaand anti-Synchro cards. Me thinks Konami secretly dislikes the Synchro Concept, while at the same time, keeps printing more of them.[/quote'] I'm betting the TCG R&D department doesn't like synchros, but has to use them because of the anime, so they get spiteful and make stuff like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.