RAEGING D0GKING Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 1 "Watt" Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Thunder-Type monsters. This card can attack your opponent directly. If this card inflicts Battle Damage to your opponent's Life Points by attacking directly, your opponent randomly returns 1 card in their hand to the top of their Deck. Discuss about Wattchimera and the Watt archetype Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 This was discussed before =/ And this is nothing like Yata <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted May 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 It is since your opponent can go on a dead draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Your opponent can scape from it just having an empty hand -.- and Stil the card you return could be useful -.- That's not Yata =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted May 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Most of the time my opponent has a card in there hand.Its still good for attacking directly and its good effect and it not being affected by BTH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 That's another topic xD Good card is Good It's decent with 1400 ATK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted May 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Watts are ROFLing at Bottomless Trap Hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCodyPwns Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Watts are lulzy. And depending on what the ruling may be on Wattcube, i just might start running them. i mean their Light, so they're already backed by a lot of support, it's just their low attack that gets them at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Watts are lulzy. And depending on what the ruling may be on Wattcube' date=' i just might start running them. i mean their Light, so they're already backed by a lot of support, it's just their low attack that gets them at times.[/quote'] WattcubeEquip only to a Thunder-Type monster. It gains 100 ATK for each Thunder-Type monster in your Graveyard. You can send this face-up card you control to the Graveyard to have a face-up Thunder-Type monster you control gain 1000 ATK. Which ruling on Wattcube? Its pretty straightforward o.x While Equipped, the monster gains 100 ATK for each Thunder-Type monster in the Graveyard. If you use its effect to send it to the Graveyard, the target Thunder-type monster gains 1000 ATK as long as that monster stays face-up on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCodyPwns Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Watts are lulzy. And depending on what the ruling may be on Wattcube' date=' i just might start running them. i mean their Light, so they're already backed by a lot of support, it's just their low attack that gets them at times.[/quote'] WattcubeEquip only to a Thunder-Type monster. It gains 100 ATK for each Thunder-Type monster in your Graveyard. You can send this face-up card you control to the Graveyard to have a face-up Thunder-Type monster you control gain 1000 ATK. Which ruling on Wattcube? Its pretty straightforward o.x While Equipped, the monster gains 100 ATK for each Thunder-Type monster in the Graveyard. If you use its effect to send it to the Graveyard, the target Thunder-type monster gains 1000 ATK as long as that monster stays face-up on the field. this is the ruling. and now i'm considering to run these guys now, Cube makes them lulzy-er :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Watt's goin' on here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 Ha, I made the origional thread stating it was the new Yata, however I now realize it isn't. Really situational in order to get this lock out makes it decent, but not amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 Watt's goin' on here? ...............:l Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 Watt's goin' on here? ...............:lIDK but these damn light bulbs arn't working for me :P_____________________________Also this card is pro and can be abused with cube. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 Abusable card is abusable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Flame Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 joule/second = <3I really wanna make a watt deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 joule/second = <3I really wanna make a watt deck. I also ROLF at the newbs believing that this sucks because it has only 1400 ATK on a LV 6 Synchro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Flame Posted May 7, 2010 Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 joule/second = <3I really wanna make a watt deck. I also ROLF at the newbs believing that this sucks because it has only 1400 ATK on a LV 6 Synchro. "Watt" I reall want is for them to put more of these guys on YND... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted May 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2010 Its nice the way Recycling Batteries works with Watts.My opponent will be like WTF with all the attacking directly watts I have.Im gonna make a Watt deck :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.