TMD (Barushi) Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Power_Breaker Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Eh, maybe sidable in another meta, but not this format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Without the second effect, it would be nice, but not run in anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Stop making topics about terrible cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Stop making topics about terrible cards. Stop saying all cards are terrible.Sort of like a reversed Breaker, too bad the second effect screws it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 The second effect isn't /that/ bad, since it works when killed by battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Stop saying all cards are terrible. Not all cards are terrible. Just a majority of them. I'd say about 2/3 of all cards are terrible, and that's a very conservative estimate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Stop saying all cards are terrible. Not all cards are terrible. Just a majority of them. I'd say about 2/3 of all cards are terrible' date=' and that's a very conservative estimate.[/quote'] What I've seen: 2/3 of times you say "Terrible. Next". The rest of the time you say "Ban. Next" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Stop saying all cards are terrible. Not all cards are terrible. Just a majority of them. I'd say about 2/3 of all cards are terrible' date=' and that's a very conservative estimate.[/quote'] What I've seen: 2/3 of times you say "Terrible. Next". The rest of the time you say "Ban. Next" Thing is, YCM likes to discuss newer cards, and sometimes, they are just meh-ish.Either that, or Pika likes to point out what cards should be banned on a "good" list. But dont worry, that list will have Torrential Tribute B&, and force us all to run 3 copies of Needle Cealing.Because its awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Stop saying all cards are terrible. Not all cards are terrible. Just a majority of them. I'd say about 2/3 of all cards are terrible' date=' and that's a very conservative estimate.[/quote'] What I've seen: 2/3 of times you say "Terrible. Next". The rest of the time you say "Ban. Next" It's not my fault a good percent of the time the only cards people feel like discussing are either terrible or bannable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted June 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Stop making topics about terrible cards. Stop posting in my topics of terrible cards kthxbai. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Breaker the Magical Warrior is at 3 Why would you run this card if Breaker is at 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Breaker the Magical Warrior is at 3 Why would you run this card if Breaker is at 3? Some Decks like Warriors. This starts at 1900 and can safely be left there, because your opponent still risks a card to destroy it. Breaker must go to 1600 or risk destroying nothing at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Breaker the Magical Warrior is at 3 Why would you run this card if Breaker is at 3? Some Decks like Warriors.And because its a fad to have cards with "breaker" in there name that destroy spell/traps. lolgigadrillbreaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Hey, how about YOUR opinion? I'm getting tired of seeing topics with a link and "Discuss." in them. Atleast have the decency to post the picture! Card sucks. SOOOOO many things do it better. Next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 26, 2010 Report Share Posted June 26, 2010 Card sucks. SOOOOO many things do it better. Next.YOU ROOK! Obveiously this card is used as an anti to the best deck everlolsarcasm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Delinquent Girl NiAtSoFi Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Final Attack Orders. EDIT: Also, He'd be lulzy in that lulzy Solid Goblins deck I posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Delinquent Girl NiAtSoFi Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Final Attack Orders. EDIT: Also, He'd be lulzy in that lulzy Solid Goblins deck I posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted June 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Hey' date=' how about YOUR opinion? I'm getting tired of seeing topics with a link and "Discuss." in them. Atleast have the decency to post the picture! Card sucks. SOOOOO many things do it better. Next.[/quote'] My opinion is that it's not a bad card. It has its uses. If you're getting tired of it then you can simply just ignore it. Btw... Mr. Anderson sucks, TNA sucks, Hogan sucks, and Bischoff sucks. Good game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted June 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Hey' date=' how about YOUR opinion? I'm getting tired of seeing topics with a link and "Discuss." in them. Atleast have the decency to post the picture! Card sucks. SOOOOO many things do it better. Next.[/quote'] My opinion is that it's not a bad card. It has its uses. If you're getting tired of it then you can simply just ignore it. Btw... Mr. Anderson sucks, TNA sucks, Hogan sucks, and Bischoff sucks. Good game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 In a good meta this could be a fun card that's some what decent, but as for now, it's crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 In a good meta this could be a fun card that's some what decent, but as for now, it's crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Stop saying all cards are terrible. Not all cards are terrible. Just a majority of them. I'd say about 2/3 of all cards are terrible' date=' and that's a very conservative estimate.[/quote'] What I've seen: 2/3 of times you say "Terrible. Next". The rest of the time you say "Ban. Next" It's not my fault a good percent of the time the only cards people feel like discussing are either terrible or bannable. That is just the kind of response I was hoping for when I read that. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Stop saying all cards are terrible. Not all cards are terrible. Just a majority of them. I'd say about 2/3 of all cards are terrible' date=' and that's a very conservative estimate.[/quote'] What I've seen: 2/3 of times you say "Terrible. Next". The rest of the time you say "Ban. Next" It's not my fault a good percent of the time the only cards people feel like discussing are either terrible or bannable. That is just the kind of response I was hoping for when I read that. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Stop saying all cards are terrible. Not all cards are terrible. Just a majority of them. I'd say about 2/3 of all cards are terrible' date=' and that's a very conservative estimate.[/quote'] What I've seen: 2/3 of times you say "Terrible. Next". The rest of the time you say "Ban. Next" It's not my fault a good percent of the time the only cards people feel like discussing are either terrible or bannable. But it is your fault that you only say those words, in order for mass +1 post count. It's not contributing to the discussion at all. Just because you're supposedly "Legendary" doesn't mean you can spam the TCG section with "_____. Next". And I highly doubt you actually made 5000 legit posts. OT: It only destroys Continuous or Field Spell/Traps, which are few except in burn. I would have sided it if Lock-Burn Decks were meta, but the only deck using those in the current meta are burn frogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.