TMD (Barushi) Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 "This card cannot be Special Summoned." just kills it. It's also level 7 with 2300 attack power.. that's just... -facepalm.- Discuss how good/bad this card would be if it was level 6 and could be special summoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 I had one of those with a misprint, making it Level 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 I had one of those with a misprint, making it Level 3. Lol.. that would be awesome.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 I think Level 6, 2300 ATK, can be Special Summoned would be fair since it can attack twice.This at level 3 is completely broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Rrey Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Awesome effect but mediocre stats!Level 7 that can't be Special Summoned kills it even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Level 6 and Special Summon-able would be oh-so lulzy. Probably too much so. Maybe Level 6 and can't be Special Summoned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Make it a level 8, bump it's attack up a lil bit more, and remove the no Special Summon then he'll be good for Doomvise. Make it a level 6, remove the no special summon, and he'll be good for my Doomvise. Konami, please make a choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 If it was ran as a main deck card... ...cards like Double coston will be useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 I kept trying to make decks that ran this card, back on Wc08, as I was under the impression that this + Infernal Gainer = This thing attacks 4 timesThe artwork for this card is amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 "This card cannot be Special Summoned." just kills it. Even without the "unable to Special Summon" clause it would still be a pretty terrible card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted August 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 If it was ran as a main deck card... ...cards like Double coston will be useful. Even with Double Coston... This card still sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 so a lv 7 2300ATK with 2 attacks plus trample is bad cuz it can't be special summoned is bad... still it has dark support and in any dark deck if used best at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Succubus Queen Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Chthonian Emperor Dragon is better, yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 Terrible. Just terrible. The fact it can't be Special Summoned just seals the fact it is terrible. Just terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted August 1, 2010 Report Share Posted August 1, 2010 so a lv 7 2300ATK with 2 attacks plus trample is bad cuz it can't be special summoned is bad... still it has dark support and in any dark deck if used best at 1.Try making a deck around it. Use WC10, YVD, whatever. You can try splashing it, or trying to focus the deck around it. See how often you summon it. And see how many cards you gave up. No need to go up against something tiered. You can just duel Six Samurai Crystal Beasts Volcanics Vanilla Heroes. See how you do. EDIT: And yes, Chthonian Emperor Dragon is much better. And it's not exactly too great, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Succubus Queen Posted August 4, 2010 Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 EDIT: And yes, Chthonian Emperor Dragon is much better. And it's not exactly too great, either.Well, Gemini have more support now, so he's at least playable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted August 4, 2010 Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 Mausoleum+Megamorph+Ojama Trio You'll have a 1150 ATK monster at the end of that turn... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 If it could be SSed i'd run it in some janky Doom Shaman deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 I would EDIT it:Darkness DestroyerDARK Fiend LV 8 3000/2000This card can be Special Summoned by tributing 1 Fiend-Type Monster. This card can attack twice during each Battle Phase. During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. This card is unaffected by the effects of Trap Cards. During your End Phase, you can select 1 card on the field and destoroy it. owait... OT: "This card is too fail to be summoned" sums up its effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 Terrible, next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Flying Toaster Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 another one of those cards with epic art but sucky effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.