Jump to content

Wattcancel


Recommended Posts

[center][img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111105150105/yugioh/images/thumb/3/31/Wattcancel-PHSW-EN-C-1E.jpg/300px-Wattcancel-PHSW-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img]
[quote]When an opponent's monster is Normal or Special Summoned: Discard 1 "Watt" monster; negate the Summon and destroy the monster.[/quote][/center]
Why yes, it's artwork was censored for some idiotic reason.
Regardless, it seems like a neat tech for Watt.dek.
Discuss,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really disliked the original art for this card and I am happy for this edit/censorship.

This card is garbage though. Why release archetype-specific inferior versions of good cards? If this card was a direct copy of Warning with a Wattcost it would be good, but no one wants to run a lame bottomless upgrade when Warning exists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ΩMEGA KAISER' timestamp='1320546185' post='5620425']
I really disliked the original art for this card and I am happy for this edit/censorship.

This card is garbage though. Why release archetype-specific inferior versions of good cards? If this card was a direct copy of Warning with a Wattcost it would be good, but no one wants to run a lame bottomless upgrade when Warning exists.
[/quote]

This is implying that it's better than Bottomless.

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1320546269' post='5620428']


This is implying that it's better than Bottomless.

lol
[/quote]You're right. I don't even know why Konami does this.

[quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1320546364' post='5620434']
I [b]really[/b] hope you're joking here. Unless you are artistically blind, a red cross with a lightning bolt in it that I could have made in PhotoShop in about 10 minutes is definitely not a better art than an electrocuted Ojama. Either that, or you're easily offended by humorous art.[/quote]I just didn't like the picture. I wasn't offended or anything I just thought that the picture was stupid. I would have rather seen a Wattgiraffe charged full of energy or zapping some other [i]intimidating[/i] monster. basically I just wanted a Watt monster on a Watt card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ΩMEGA KAISER' timestamp='1320546615' post='5620433']
You're right. I don't even know why Konami does this.

I just didn't like the picture. I wasn't offended or anything I just thought that the picture was stupid. I would have rather seen a Wattgiraffe charged full of energy or zapping some other [i]intimidating[/i] monster. basically I just wanted a Watt monster on a Watt card.
[/quote]

But, this still doesn't. That's pretty much what's annoying me. The OCG art is still superior because the TCG art was bad. If the TCG art featured what you just described, I'd go for it anytime over zapped Ojamas. But AWKWARD RED CROSS WITH A BOLT OF ELECTRIC GORGONZOLA CHEESE. YEAH. NOOOO KONAMI. YOU DID IT WRONG.

Konami has that habit too. Make a good card, some sets later, make an inferior copy. Only correctly done example was Judgment to Warning. Horrible ones were Seven Tools and the 300 copies of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ΩMEGA KAISER' timestamp='1320546615' post='5620433']
You're right. I don't even know why Konami does this.

I just didn't like the picture. I wasn't offended or anything I just thought that the picture was stupid. I would have rather seen a Wattgiraffe charged full of energy or zapping some other [i]intimidating[/i] monster. basically I just wanted a Watt monster on a Watt card.
[/quote]

This isn't a Watt monster on a Watt card either.

So you pretty much contradicted yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1320547082' post='5620465']
This isn't a Watt monster on a Watt card either.

So you pretty much contradicted yourself.
[/quote]I didn't. If the card is gong to feature a monster then should be a Watt monster. This has no monster so it's better to me. The original just messed up the whole visual style to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ΩMEGA KAISER' timestamp='1320557152' post='5620708']
I didn't. If the card is gong to feature a monster then should be a Watt monster. This has no monster so it's better to me. The original just messed up the whole visual style to me.
[/quote]
Yea but this? The Ojama may have been bad, but this was worse imo.

Anyway, card is lulz, but basically an Archtype Black Horn of Heaven that works on Normal Summons. Maybe if it was REVEALING 1 Watt it would be decent, but this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1320557522' post='5620721']
Yea but this? The Ojama may have been bad, but this was worse imo.

Anyway, card is lulz, but basically an Archtype Black Horn of Heaven that works on Normal Summons. Maybe if it was REVEALING 1 Watt it would be decent, but this?
[/quote]If the cost was a reveal it would be so awesome. I wish Konami could buff/nerf cards. They need to straight up retcon a lot of their underpowered cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...