Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It always deserved to be banned, even though it was sad to see it go.

Also, of all the cards banned thanks to whatever OTK/FTK deck, you choose Mind Master, who was banned thanks to the most abused, hated, undeveloped, unloved, not-quite-good enough archetype without him? Seriously?

[img]https://i.chzbgr.com/completestore/12/5/11/mCpfZdnI30e7flaIzOmETw2.jpg[/img]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Јordan' timestamp='1336784327' post='5937581']
Name one OTK with this that doesn't involve gustos.
[/quote]

Not sure on OTKs, but I believe RFG Psychics made some good use of it, too.

Anyways.
Card absurdly treated Psychics as if they were an Arch-type. I can only imagine the horror if this guy existed for a more supported Type. Machine, Fairy, Fiend, Insect, and Warrior come to mind.

As long as this card and it's potential existed in legal play, it's use was going to purely be dedicated to OTKs, and at the same time, this type of design also prevents much more good support to actually be made for it's target type, because of how easily it can break it.


At the very least, it's not as bad as Substitoad by a small margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[font=georgia,serif]I'm surprised this card didn't get hit way earlier; this card's design was generous enough to allow multiple Psychic summons in a single turn at the cost of Royal Oppression per Psychic - a dangerous offer in the long run, given how underdeveloped the Type was and still is. Could've severely restricted Psychic creation and design if it were allowed to stay for far longer.[/font]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1336838846' post='5938002']
[url=http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Caam,_Serenity_of_Gusto]Caam[/url]@0
Brain Lab@0
Charging Cell@0
Power Well@0
E-Tele@0
Uhhh....
Bunch of random Psychic cards@0

This@1
????????????????????
[/quote]
One for One

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...