CLG Klavier Posted November 6, 2014 Report Share Posted November 6, 2014 2 or more (max. 5) Level 4 Warrior-Type monsters During each of your opponent's End Phases: Detach 1 Xyz Materialfrom this card. This card gains the following effects based on the number of Xyz Materials attached to it. ● 1 or more: This card cannot be destroyed by battle. ● 2 or more: This card gains 1500 ATK and DEF. ● 3 or more: This card is unaffected by other card effects. ● 4 or more: Your opponent cannot Normal/Special Summon. ● 5 or more: Once per turn: You can destroy all cards your opponentcontrols. I want this in TCG reeeeaaaal bad ;; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP Posted November 6, 2014 Report Share Posted November 6, 2014 Let's hope we get those OCG exclusives in some way. Like, maybe our own extra pack or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted November 6, 2014 Report Share Posted November 6, 2014 I too am eagerly awaiting the release of the OCG exclusive Numbers and corresponding archetype members. While I'm glad the OCG printed original Numbers to support archetypes, it's frustrating that the TCG can't really use those archetypes effectively without them. -Heraldics need Amphisbaena, Heraldry Augment, and No.18 -Chronomaly need Nebra Disk and No.36 -Heroics need Assault Halberd and No.86 -Battlin' Boxer need No.79 The more time that passes without them being released, the more the meta will stray from Xyz archetypes until those cards become obsolete. As for this card, it seems really cool, being able to take advantage of some of the Warrior and Heroic spam effects to turn into something really threatening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted November 6, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2014 Stellars could literally vomit this out on 5-mat easily, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted November 6, 2014 Report Share Posted November 6, 2014 I feel bad playing this card because the optimal Deck for it is Tellarknight and any other use just feels like a waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 6, 2014 Report Share Posted November 6, 2014 -Heroics need Assault Halberd and No.86Technically, Heroics are fine without 86. I mean, it's nice and all, but you typically want to make Excalibur.Thousand Blades is more along the lines of what they need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted November 6, 2014 Report Share Posted November 6, 2014 Yeah, as newhat said, Tella's the only deck around where this would be optimal enough. Heroics would need Thousand Blades and Halberd more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted November 6, 2014 Report Share Posted November 6, 2014 I too am eagerly awaiting the release of the OCG exclusive Numbers and corresponding archetype members. While I'm glad the OCG printed original Numbers to support archetypes, it's frustrating that the TCG can't really use those archetypes effectively without them. -Heraldics need Amphisbaena, Heraldry Augment, and No.18 -Chronomaly need Nebra Disk and No.36 -Heroics need Assault Halberd and No.86 -Battlin' Boxer need No.79 The more time that passes without them being released, the more the meta will stray from Xyz archetypes until those cards become obsolete. As for this card, it seems really cool, being able to take advantage of some of the Warrior and Heroic spam effects to turn into something really threatening. >Doesn't even mention Galaxy Soldier Warrior Spam is best spam. It feels subpar in Satellars but in the home deck it wrecks (and in a few other decks). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daigusto Sphreez Posted November 7, 2014 Report Share Posted November 7, 2014 -Heraldics need Amphisbaena, Heraldry Augment, and No.18 -Chronomaly need Nebra Disk and No.36 -Heroics need Assault Halberd and No.86 -Battlin' Boxer need No.79 Don't forget shark support. That interests me more than the ones you list anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted November 7, 2014 Report Share Posted November 7, 2014 And Number 55. We don't have that eoither. Heck we still have no words on Numbers 1-5, and 100 either....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted November 7, 2014 Report Share Posted November 7, 2014 >Doesn't even mention Galaxy Soldier Warrior Spam is best spam. It feels subpar in Satellars but in the home deck it wrecks (and in a few other decks). I was thinking primarily of the unreleased archetypal OCG Numbers. But GOD DAMN, I want Galaxy Soldier. So bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted November 8, 2014 Report Share Posted November 8, 2014 And Number 55. We don't have that either. Heck we still have no words on Numbers 1-5, and 100 either....... I wouldn't be surprised if Konami wanted to be dicks and released those Numbers as OCG Exclusives in their packs (like Numbers 86, 18, etc). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Polo Posted November 8, 2014 Report Share Posted November 8, 2014 This + tellarknights (that archetype that can start the whole game running by just playing 1 card) is a ridiculously broken combo, how do you stop it anyway? should rot in the banlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted November 8, 2014 Report Share Posted November 8, 2014 I also remember that situational but potent combo between this and CXyz Barian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Dom- Posted November 8, 2014 Report Share Posted November 8, 2014 5 mat Rhongo bongo (as I saw someone call it) is just amazing (as others have said, only really in tellars, but so good there that it doesn't matter). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.