Slinky Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 検問 Kenmon (Inspection)Normal Trap Card(1) When an opponent’s monster declares an attack: look at your opponent’s hand, and if there is a Monster Card, negate that attack, then choose 1 monster from the opponent’s hand and discard it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 This is adorable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Xathers Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 ... is that Goblin of Greed hiding in Supply's cart? Anyways, it can screw with your opponent's hand, but otherwise it's reliant on the opponent having a monster in hand. I'll pass on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello my name is Enguin Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 That art is beautiful. This looks potentially really good as well actually, being a battle trap aside selective discarding and seeing your opponent's hand is cool. More trolly than amazing but I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 not bad. Not fantastic mind you, but very neat and not awful. I like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 This reminds me of that one Trap Card that Jin used against Yuma. It negated an attack, then sent a monster from the hand to the Graveyard. It's...okay? Battle-specific Traps are tricky, due to how much removal exists, and this doesn't really do anything other than hand peeking, and it's dependent on the contents of the hand to even negate the attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 Sounds sorta like a "fixed" Trap Dustshoot. Can't be used willy-nilly, needs to be set off. IDK, it doesn't seem bad but I feel like it won't see any more use than Scrap-Iron Scarecrow, as as much of an inconvenience it can be, it's not a big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 Supply + Forceful Sentry + Goblin of Greed in a card? Nice. It's not fantastic, but it does still disrupt the hand at the cost of needing to be triggered at battle and still not negating the attack. It would only work best in decks that are slower and are dependent on maintaining hand advantage instead of dumping it all in investment before battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 How do you think TCG will name it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 How do you think TCG will name it?Supply Inspection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 Supply + Forceful Sentry + Goblin of Greed in a card? Nice. It's not fantastic, but it does still disrupt the hand at the cost of needing to be triggered at battle and still not negating the attack. It would only work best in decks that are slower and are dependent on maintaining hand advantage instead of dumping it all in investment before battle.It actually does negate the attack if they have a monster in hand.How do you think TCG will name it?Checkpoint inspection or similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 Oh hey, this character again in the artwork. Haven't seen this cart since Cry Havoc! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted April 7, 2016 Report Share Posted April 7, 2016 I checked the Org and it has the name down as "Examination" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.