Dharc is a girl!

[Tronta]

what if dharc was based on a real person?

[The Warden]

Kimmy, I must say that you are quite misguided in this idiots conquest. Clearly, you are a one knight stand against the most impenetrable castle in existance. Firstly, you contradicted yourself by saying that GX was a waste of time, yet, you used it to back up your statements? Secondly, Dakness is a touchy element, you cna be all airy fairy in the light because it is good and holy and all that jazz. But the dakness is the unknown, it may twist your ideals, your form, even your soul, but know this. It is not evil, it may drive people to evil and I accept that, but the concept of darkness is not evil. People fear the dark because they fear the unknown. People that wield darkness may do evil things, but maybe they have a reason, try Maleficent. Sure, she may be a dark witch, but, that still doesn't mean that she shouldn't be invited to the party. Darkness has a reason, but, you blind yourself in darkness as in light. Truely Kimmy, you aren't between Heaven and Nightmaren.

 

Do you know why I sided with Roxas? Not because I know him or care about, frankly, I think he's a bit of a prick. No, because I side with logic and reason. It is the cowards way to not accept defeat, so go, topple your king before the final piece is placed for chackmate.

[Phantom Roxas]

Kimmy' date=' I must say that you are quite misguided in this idiots conquest. Clearly, you are a one knight stand against the most impenetrable castle in existance. Firstly, you contradicted yourself by saying that GX was a waste of time, yet, you used it to back up your statements? Secondly, Dakness is a touchy element, you cna be all airy fairy in the light because it is good and holy and all that jazz. But the dakness is the unknown, it may twist your ideals, your form, even your soul, but know this. It is not evil, it may drive people to evil and I accept that, but the concept of darkness is not evil. People fear the dark because they fear the unknown. People that wield darkness may do evil things, but maybe they have a reason, try Maleficent. Sure, she may be a dark witch, but, that still doesn't mean that she shouldn't be invited to the party. Darkness has a reason, but, you blind yourself in darkness as in light. Truely Kimmy, you aren't between Heaven and Nightmaren.

 

Do you know why I sided with Roxas? Not because I know him or care about, frankly, [b']I think he's a bit of a prick.[/b] No, because I side with logic and reason. It is the cowards way to not accept defeat, so go, topple your king before the final piece is placed for chackmate.

 

Explain.

[Sleepy]

lol xD

 

Honestly, the creator of the card... I bet he didn't think so deep into even his favorite card...

 

as well as its difficult to me to think that the same person drew all 3000+ cards in the game.. (this is for the ones that show excuses such as "its his style")

 

Polaris is getting rid of the fun :(...... pretend its a real person.... pretend you care/are interested.... now.. what gender do you think Dharc has? ...

 

This argument is something I didn't want to use sinse its my personal opinion, but it makes sense.... The Charmers where made to look cute, and so far everyone looks like that.. even if darkness would corrupt someone, its not enough reason to think they have to nessesarily look ugly. People want those cards for collection, those are never good in a Deck. so the main think they want is the pic..................................now....having said that, Note how Dharc looks cute if you look it as a boy. But if you think of it as a girl, its kindof a disgusting girl, not to offend =/ .......... why would the company ruin the only purpose of such cards?

[Tronta]

i like the use of genre in place of gender :P

[Sleepy]

i like the use of genre in place of gender :P

 

I'm sure you do ;)

I'll look through my posts and see what I change (Oviously English isn't my first language, its Spanish by the way).... for now.. thanks for the tip, I'll remember that xD

[The Warden]

Explain which part roxas?

[Exiro]

i disagree polaris!

i think this is super serious important business!

also

boys can be made.

snakes' date=' snails, puppydog tails...

and then when a mommy and a daddy love each other very much....

[/quote']

 

...Accidents happen. Like you. :p

 

That's birth, not being made. Cards aren't born, they're made, boys and girls aren't made, they're born. Dharc is a card, ergo made, ergo genderless, ergo "this topic is stupid".

 

Being born can be considered as a biologic method of being 'made'.

 

 

You people need to make better contributions to society. Get a job or something. Anything.

 

Dharc has no gender' date=' [b']it's[/b] a few layers of thin cardboard mashed together, stamped, and mass-produced via factory machines, at which point it is coupled with other such material combinations and wrapped in TDGS packs via machine. Then its shipped to shops, at which point you buy them before opening them, at which point you stare at the card for a couple valuable hours you could be spending applying for a job, arguing about the gender of your stamped thin stamped cardboard.

 

If you compare the figure on Dharc's art with a real human being, you'll see many similarities, because it's actually based on what the human race looks like. If humans had 8 tentacles, that figure would probably do so too. Humans have two genders, boy and girl, and signs of those gender include having have penis or a vagina/breasts. They aren't usually genderless. Sometimes, the mentioned signs are visible, sometimes they aren't, and in this case, it ain't clear. What we are doing here is stating facts about the picture to back up our arguments about whether it's a boy or a girl. If you want to state that it's genderless, back up your facts by noticing similarities between the figure on the picture and an organism that is usually genderless.

 

 

Polaris is getting rid of the fun :(

 

And the fun is back.

 

 

Explain which part roxas?

 

I'd assume he meant the bolded part, no?

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

I'm not surprised, I got pretty much all the Charmers that exist in the TCG.

 

All of them...ARE GIRLS!

 

The TLM Charmers look like girls, you can tell by how they look like and what they're wearing.

 

For all I know, the Charmers are all FEMALE!

[-Doodle]

hi is a guy

he wears guy's pants

he have no breast

[Sleepy]

I'm not surprised' date=' I got pretty much all the Charmers that exist in the TCG.

 

All of them...ARE GIRLS!

 

The TLM Charmers look like girls, you can tell by how they look like and what they're wearing.

 

For all I know, the Charmers are all FEMALE!

[/quote']

 

You need to support that argument alot better than that... I don't remember reading a law that said "all Charmers are obligatorily Female without exceptions, even if they don't look like it" anywhere....

true, all the Elemental charmers are Female and everyone can pretty much notice. This pic in the other hand, is different. Its more devatable, although I personally am pretty sure its a boy. Not being able to notice its no different than if in a real life example, you look at (lets say) arnold schwarzenegger, and say "that is definetely a girl, I'm going to back up that theory saying how pretty I think she is!, how come no1 else found out?,".......

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

i disagree polaris!

i think this is super serious important business!

also

boys can be made.

snakes' date=' snails, puppydog tails...

and then when a mommy and a daddy love each other very much....

[/quote']

 

...Accidents happen. Like you. :p

 

That's birth, not being made. Cards aren't born, they're made, boys and girls aren't made, they're born. Dharc is a card, ergo made, ergo genderless, ergo "this topic is stupid".

 

Being born can be considered as a biologic method of being 'made'.

 

But for our purposes, it won't be. =)

 

You people need to make better contributions to society. Get a job or something. Anything.

 

Dharc has no gender' date=' [b']it's[/b] a few layers of thin cardboard mashed together, stamped, and mass-produced via factory machines, at which point it is coupled with other such material combinations and wrapped in TDGS packs via machine. Then its shipped to shops, at which point you buy them before opening them, at which point you stare at the card for a couple valuable hours you could be spending applying for a job, arguing about the gender of your stamped thin stamped cardboard.

 

If you compare the figure on Dharc's art with a real human being, you'll see many similarities, because it's actually based on what the human race looks like. If humans had 8 tentacles, that figure would probably do so too. Humans have two genders, boy and girl, and signs of those gender include having have penis or a vagina/breasts. They aren't usually genderless. Sometimes, the mentioned signs are visible, sometimes they aren't, and in this case, it ain't clear. What we are doing here is stating facts about the picture to back up our arguments about whether it's a boy or a girl. If you want to state that it's genderless, back up your facts by noticing similarities between the figure on the picture and an organism that is usually genderless.

 

Paper. Now paper wouldn't really be considered an "organism", but I'd say it's pretty genderless, wouldn't you? :p

 

The "figure" was made from coloured pixels in an image editor, and was made into a piece of paper, or a material of similar likeness.

 

Polaris is getting rid of the fun :(

 

And the fun is back.

 

The fun never left. sleepy just said it did, doesn't change matters.

[kimmy1235]

Ok, just to keep track of what is going on I am going to list things things that we have listed that point out that Dharc is or is not a girl. This is post is for both sides and will be completely unbias.

 

Dharc is a girl:

 

1.Before Dharc all the other Charmers were girls, so it can be assumed Dharc is the same.

2. Dharc wears what seems to be a girls top.

 

Dharc is a boy:

 

1.An offical at a tournament told Lord JZ of the Enigma that Dharc is a boy.

2.Dharc wears pants.

 

That's about it. Not thing else here suggests that Dharc is either a boy or a girl.

[Tronta]

um, also for the boy side, he looks like a guy.

and he has a penis.

[kimmy1235]

um' date=' also for the boy side, he looks like a guy.

and he has a penis.

[/quote']

 

I didn't put that down because we have already shown that guys can look girl and girls guys. Also some of us think that Dharc looks like a girl. Lastly there is no proof Dharc has a penis.

[Von Csent]

Dharc's face looks like a girl's to me, and it is not ugly. Also, I know several gothic-dressing girls whose clothes look boyish. Her shirt looks girlish, and the shorts, though long, do not automatically mean that she is a he.

[Darkerai]

Lastly there is no proof Dharc has a penis.

 

...and the floodgates open to some realy disturbing coments...you know what I don't think there can be any solution to this debate in any way as not only is it difficult to tell but there will not be anymore forms so far in any future sets...so far...

[Tronta]

Well that's like arguing that bridget can't be a girl because he looks like one. Obviously he isn't, but he still looked like one. Regardless of whether he's an effeminate guy or a masculine girl, dharc still looks like a guy, and as such, it provides valid evidence to that end.

[~Emo~]

This topic needs to get shot.

[kimmy1235]

This topic needs to get shot.

 

I don't know Emo, alot of people like this topic and you can at least say that it is entertaining.

[~Emo~]

This topic needs to get shot.

 

I don't know Emo' date=' alot of people [b']HAT[/b]E this topic and you can at least say that it is entertaining.

 

ur trying to defend a transvestite/cross dresser/homo/misunderstanding, I find it annoying that ur trying to defend a bad card. Why don't you defend JD shade of blue?

[Sleepy]

This topic needs to get shot.

 

I don't know Emo' date=' alot of people [b']HAT[/b]E this topic and you can at least say that it is entertaining.

 

ur trying to defend a transvestite/cross dresser/homo/misunderstanding, I find it annoying that ur trying to defend a bad card. Why don't you defend JD shade of blue?

 

no one in this site is forced to visit every topic they see.. if you hate it so much, just don't enter.... I'm pretty sure anyone can ignore something like this...

[kimmy1235]

This topic needs to get shot.

 

I don't know Emo' date=' alot of people [b']HAT[/b]E this topic and you can at least say that it is entertaining.

 

ur trying to defend a transvestite/cross dresser/homo/misunderstanding, I find it annoying that ur trying to defend a bad card. Why don't you defend JD shade of blue?

 

May I ask who are you to determing what is and is not a bad card. I once made a chamer deck that focused on using charmers to take control of my opponent's monster to sacrifice for stronger monsters or my possessed charmer. I personally have been waiting for na card like Dharc and while you are entitled to your opinion that it is bad I am entitled to think that it is good. In the end it is all just opinions, but I have personally seen so called "bad cards" cripple meta based decks.

[~Emo~]

This topic needs to get shot.

 

I don't know Emo' date=' alot of people [b']HAT[/b]E this topic and you can at least say that it is entertaining.

 

ur trying to defend a transvestite/cross dresser/homo/misunderstanding, I find it annoying that ur trying to defend a bad card. Why don't you defend JD shade of blue?

 

May I ask who are you to determing what is and is not a bad card. I once made a chamer deck that focused on using charmers to take control of my opponent's monster to sacrifice for stronger monsters or my possessed charmer. I personally have been waiting for na card like Dharc and while you are entitled to your opinion that it is bad I am entitled to think that it is good. In the end it is all just opinions, but I have personally seen so called "bad cards" cripple meta based decks.

lol NO

 

Charmer's are terrible. Look through the posts. I am not the only one. U go up against a Hopeless, Macro, LS, Tele DAD, ur basically screwed.

[kimmy1235]

This topic needs to get shot.

 

I don't know Emo' date=' alot of people [b']HAT[/b]E this topic and you can at least say that it is entertaining.

 

ur trying to defend a transvestite/cross dresser/homo/misunderstanding, I find it annoying that ur trying to defend a bad card. Why don't you defend JD shade of blue?

 

May I ask who are you to determing what is and is not a bad card. I once made a chamer deck that focused on using charmers to take control of my opponent's monster to sacrifice for stronger monsters or my possessed charmer. I personally have been waiting for na card like Dharc and while you are entitled to your opinion that it is bad I am entitled to think that it is good. In the end it is all just opinions, but I have personally seen so called "bad cards" cripple meta based decks.

lol NO

 

Charmer's are terrible. Look through the posts. I am not the only one. U go up against a Hopeless, Macro, LS, Tele DAD, ur basically screwed.

 

If you say so, just don't be surprised when a card that you think is bad takes you down one day, becuase irony is funny like that. All I have to say know is you should take Sleepy's advice, if you don't like this topic don't keep coming back just to say you don't like this topic. No matter how long you try people will just keep posting here until they think the topic is over with.