Why does everyone hate Republicans?

[Dark]

Because democrats are lazy. They want the government to do everything for them. I call them communists. But Republicans actually work for money and freedom. They don't want somebody (the government) doing every thing for them. But the dems do. And if the Republicans get guts' date=' they wouldn't let the democrats get away with everything. And possibly the most important reason, the Democrats are scared of the Republicans. No I was wrong, this is the most important reason, DEMOCRATS ARE CRAZY!! They're way too dramatic.

[/quote']

 

Read: bolded line.

 

Now: assume a democrat was in the government.

 

Because said democrat is lazy, he wants himself to do everything for himself.

 

:/

 

You don't understand what I said. When I said they want the government doing everything for them, that means that they want the government to give them money when they need it, they want the government to be in controll of EVERYTHING!

 

Because my family alone has enough power to pay back everything America owns to China. Face it, the government has more power, they can do more things. We (the people) created the government, but so long as I am not the president, I am not in control.

 

But then you are gonna get the whole sheet on checks and balances. I AM NOT PART OF ANY OF THE THREE BRANCHES. I have less power than people in the three branches. I can't do things myself. The government has MORE POWER.

[OMGAKITTY]

K' date=' Washington, Jefferson, all them were non denominational.

 

Bushes RAISE TAXES

Remember?

"Read my lips, NO MORE TAXES"

"Sorry, folks, we're gonna admit we lied. We're gonna take the rest of what you live on for our own selfish needs by raising taxes.

Reagan was good, but blew a bunch o' cash on "Star Wars" Which didn't even work.

[/quote']

 

Um. False. Washington is the only party-less president of the US.

 

I did NOT ask you.

Still, Republicans take our money and blow it.

Democrats are lazy.

NEITHER OF THEM KEEP PROMISES[/b]

 

You actually didn't ask anyone. Because you made a statement, not a question. lrn2engrish.

 

Yeah, way to over generalize both parties.

And if your talking about presidents, they really can't do sheet without Congress backing them. Which happens oh so very rarely.

[Static]

Because democrats are lazy. They want the government to do everything for them. I call them communists. But Republicans actually work for money and freedom. They don't want somebody (the government) doing every thing for them. But the dems do. And if the Republicans get guts' date=' they wouldn't let the democrats get away with everything. And possibly the most important reason, the Democrats are scared of the Republicans. No I was wrong, this is the most important reason, DEMOCRATS ARE CRAZY!! They're way too dramatic.

[/quote']

 

Read: bolded line.

 

Now: assume a democrat was in the government.

 

Because said democrat is lazy, he wants himself to do everything for himself.

 

:/

 

You don't understand what I said. When I said they want the government doing everything for them, that means that they want the government to give them money when they need it, they want the government to be in controll of EVERYTHING!

 

In a proper society, that's the way it would be.

 

But since this is America we're talking about, that's never going to be the case unless the middle east, through nothing short of divine will, conquers the white-bureaucratic world. Democrats want the government to do what the Government is supposed to do, take care of infrastructure, education, and the necessities, military being one requiring minimal maintenance. The republican party however wants RICH PEOPLE to take the place of government through corporate sponsorship and bribery, along with alloting a much larger amount of money to military, something that only helps stockholders. They want a nationalist economy; the rich being the elite, and nationalism in any form is simply unacceptable.

[Dictator7]

Because democrats are lazy. They want the government to do everything for them. I call them communists. But Republicans actually work for money and freedom. They don't want somebody (the government) doing every thing for them. But the dems do. And if the Republicans get guts' date=' they wouldn't let the democrats get away with everything. And possibly the most important reason, the Democrats are scared of the Republicans. No I was wrong, this is the most important reason, DEMOCRATS ARE CRAZY!! They're way too dramatic.

[/quote']

 

Read: bolded line.

 

Now: assume a democrat was in the government.

 

Because said democrat is lazy, he wants himself to do everything for himself.

 

:/

 

You don't understand what I said. When I said they want the government doing everything for them, that means that they want the government to give them money when they need it, they want the government to be in controll of EVERYTHING!

 

In a proper society, that's the way it would be.

 

But since this is America we're talking about, that's never going to be the case unless the middle east, through nothing short of divine will, conquers the white-bureaucratic world. Democrats want the government to do what the Government is supposed to do, take care of infrastructure, education, and the necessities, military being one requiring minimal maintenance. The republican party however wants RICH PEOPLE to take the place of government through corporate sponsorship and bribery, along with alloting a much larger amount of money to military, something that only helps stockholders. They want a nationalist economy; the rich being the elite, and nationalism in any form is simply unacceptable.

 

No. That is false. The Republicans want to cut spending, (unlike the Dems) on unecessary s***. They don't want rich people to be in charge. They want the government to be equal. Some Republicans and some Democrats.

[Dark]

Let's get this through your head:

 

Republican's cut taxes for rich people (not much of America) and hope when rich people spend money, it will trickle down and work its way to the poor people.

 

Democrat's cut taxes for poor people (most of America) so they can actually spend money and not live in a cardboard box.

 

I think you really need to read a book, or watch both sides of a news channel (so there is no bias), or do something to fix that brain of yours.

[Static]

Because democrats are lazy. They want the government to do everything for them. I call them communists. But Republicans actually work for money and freedom. They don't want somebody (the government) doing every thing for them. But the dems do. And if the Republicans get guts' date=' they wouldn't let the democrats get away with everything. And possibly the most important reason, the Democrats are scared of the Republicans. No I was wrong, this is the most important reason, DEMOCRATS ARE CRAZY!! They're way too dramatic.

[/quote']

 

Read: bolded line.

 

Now: assume a democrat was in the government.

 

Because said democrat is lazy, he wants himself to do everything for himself.

 

:/

 

You don't understand what I said. When I said they want the government doing everything for them, that means that they want the government to give them money when they need it, they want the government to be in controll of EVERYTHING!

 

In a proper society, that's the way it would be.

 

But since this is America we're talking about, that's never going to be the case unless the middle east, through nothing short of divine will, conquers the white-bureaucratic world. Democrats want the government to do what the Government is supposed to do, take care of infrastructure, education, and the necessities, military being one requiring minimal maintenance. The republican party however wants RICH PEOPLE to take the place of government through corporate sponsorship and bribery, along with alloting a much larger amount of money to military, something that only helps stockholders. They want a nationalist economy; the rich being the elite, and nationalism in any form is simply unacceptable.

 

No. That is false. The Republicans want to cut spending, (unlike the Dems) on unecessary s***. They don't want rich people to be in charge. They want the government to be equal. Some Republicans and some Democrats.

 

Unnecessary sheet... You mean that bullshit "National Security" scheme, right?

 

Biggest waste of money in history.

 

We SHOULD be spending money on infrastructure and Education, that's WHY I PAY TAXES. I'd evade them to no end if I knew it was all going towards pretend security or killing people... owait....

 

Republicans want Corporations to be unchecked and free to trade as they wish. That simply cannot be allowed; the government needs to make sure that these rich bastards are not doing what they're not supposed to do. Free trade in the Libertarian sense is simply too unchecked to be viable. International communities check each other, even the branches of our own government check each other, but we can't let Government check businesses? That's just bologna.

 

An "Equal" government, since you did use the term, is a Socialist one. There is no such thing as a viable "equal" government.

[Dictator7]

Let's get this through your head:

 

Republican's cut taxes for rich people (not much of America) and hope when rich people spend money' date=' it will trickle down and work its way to the poor people.

 

Democrat's cut taxes for poor people (most of America) so they can actually spend money and not live in a cardboard box.

 

I think you really need to read a book, or watch both sides of a news channel (so there is no bias), or do something to fix that brain of yours.

[/quote']

 

All I here is Republicans are bad and they are messin everything up. Republicans aren't in charge and messin everything up. Obama is in Charge. Obama here is taxing every one and taking money away form people who earned it. I get my thoughts from many sources here. And most news channels are biased. They're all liberals! They don'ttell the truth. My brain is fine.

[Dark]

There is really no getting through to you. How delightful, I might have spent my next few posts trying to change your opinion, but I'd rather not waste my time and search more on this childrens card forum.

[Dictator7]

Because democrats are lazy. They want the government to do everything for them. I call them communists. But Republicans actually work for money and freedom. They don't want somebody (the government) doing every thing for them. But the dems do. And if the Republicans get guts' date=' they wouldn't let the democrats get away with everything. And possibly the most important reason, the Democrats are scared of the Republicans. No I was wrong, this is the most important reason, DEMOCRATS ARE CRAZY!! They're way too dramatic.

[/quote']

 

Read: bolded line.

 

Now: assume a democrat was in the government.

 

Because said democrat is lazy, he wants himself to do everything for himself.

 

:/

 

You don't understand what I said. When I said they want the government doing everything for them, that means that they want the government to give them money when they need it, they want the government to be in controll of EVERYTHING!

 

In a proper society, that's the way it would be.

 

But since this is America we're talking about, that's never going to be the case unless the middle east, through nothing short of divine will, conquers the white-bureaucratic world. Democrats want the government to do what the Government is supposed to do, take care of infrastructure, education, and the necessities, military being one requiring minimal maintenance. The republican party however wants RICH PEOPLE to take the place of government through corporate sponsorship and bribery, along with alloting a much larger amount of money to military, something that only helps stockholders. They want a nationalist economy; the rich being the elite, and nationalism in any form is simply unacceptable.

 

No. That is false. The Republicans want to cut spending, (unlike the Dems) on unecessary s***. They don't want rich people to be in charge. They want the government to be equal. Some Republicans and some Democrats.

 

Unnecessary s***... You mean that bullshit "National Security" scheme, right?

 

Biggest waste of money in history.

 

We SHOULD be spending money on infrastructure and Education, that's WHY I PAY TAXES. I'd evade them to no end if I knew it was all going towards pretend security or killing people... owait....

 

Republicans want Corporations to be unchecked and free to trade as they wish. That simply cannot be allowed; the government needs to make sure that these rich bastards are not doing what they're not supposed to do. Free trade in the Libertarian sense is simply too unchecked to be viable. International communities check each other, even the branches of our own government check each other, but we can't let Government check businesses? That's just bologna.

 

An "Equal" government, since you did use the term, is a Socialist one. There is no such thing as a viable "equal" government.

 

Oh ya. Education. Why the hell do we need to spend more on education!? In the early 1900's and before that, the government did nothing with the schools and education. They did fine. We dont' need to spend anymore on education. That is what I was talking about unnecessary sheet!

[Dark]

This is why America is one of the stupidest countries in the world. Compare ourselves to India, China and Japan.

[Dictator7]

This is why America is one of the stupidest countries in the world. Compare ourselves to India' date=' China and Japan.

[/quote']

 

I can only say one word. EXACTLY!

[OMGAKITTY]

Because democrats are lazy. They want the government to do everything for them. I call them communists. But Republicans actually work for money and freedom. They don't want somebody (the government) doing every thing for them. But the dems do. And if the Republicans get guts' date=' they wouldn't let the democrats get away with everything. And possibly the most important reason, the Democrats are scared of the Republicans. No I was wrong, this is the most important reason, DEMOCRATS ARE CRAZY!! They're way too dramatic.

[/quote']

 

Read: bolded line.

 

Now: assume a democrat was in the government.

 

Because said democrat is lazy, he wants himself to do everything for himself.

 

:/

 

You don't understand what I said. When I said they want the government doing everything for them, that means that they want the government to give them money when they need it, they want the government to be in controll of EVERYTHING!

 

In a proper society, that's the way it would be.

 

But since this is America we're talking about, that's never going to be the case unless the middle east, through nothing short of divine will, conquers the white-bureaucratic world. Democrats want the government to do what the Government is supposed to do, take care of infrastructure, education, and the necessities, military being one requiring minimal maintenance. The republican party however wants RICH PEOPLE to take the place of government through corporate sponsorship and bribery, along with alloting a much larger amount of money to military, something that only helps stockholders. They want a nationalist economy; the rich being the elite, and nationalism in any form is simply unacceptable.

 

No. That is false. The Republicans want to cut spending, (unlike the Dems) on unecessary s***. They don't want rich people to be in charge. They want the government to be equal. Some Republicans and some Democrats.

 

Unnecessary s***... You mean that bullshit "National Security" scheme, right?

 

Biggest waste of money in history.

 

We SHOULD be spending money on infrastructure and Education, that's WHY I PAY TAXES. I'd evade them to no end if I knew it was all going towards pretend security or killing people... owait....

 

Republicans want Corporations to be unchecked and free to trade as they wish. That simply cannot be allowed; the government needs to make sure that these rich bastards are not doing what they're not supposed to do. Free trade in the Libertarian sense is simply too unchecked to be viable. International communities check each other, even the branches of our own government check each other, but we can't let Government check businesses? That's just bologna.

 

An "Equal" government, since you did use the term, is a Socialist one. There is no such thing as a viable "equal" government.

 

Oh ya. Education. Why the hell do we need to spend more on education!? In the early 1900's and before that, the government did nothing with the schools and education. They did fine. We dont' need to spend anymore on education. That is what I was talking about unnecessary s***!

 

...You are either an idiot or a troll. I'm still deciding.

 

This is why America is one of the stupidest countries in the world. Compare ourselves to India' date=' China and Japan.

[/quote']

 

lol2millionminutes.

[Dark]

I did not understand the "2 million minutes" part. =\

[OMGAKITTY]

I did not understand the "2 million minutes" part. =\

 

Its a ridiculously biased documentary comparing US, China, and India's educational system. Its worthwhile because the US school was my school :D

[Dictator7]

Why am I an idiot or a troll? Answer that for me since I am such an idiot, so I can't answer that for myself.

[Dark]

When you look at transfer students from India and China and Japan (minus the accent, of course), you can see how they excel in math and science compared to, in reality, the rest of the school. There must have been something going on in those countries.

 

Maybe if we put more tax dollars into education, those people from Texas, Kentucky and the likes wouldn't be so stupid.

[OMGAKITTY]

Transfer students. Which kind of student will pay money to go live in a different country to further their education? The really freaking smart ones. You can't base everything off of transfer students.

[Dark]

Ehh, you are partially right in that sense.

 

But you can't use people from the slums and villages of these countries as comparison either.

 

You can't really compare who is smarter or who has the higher average smartness.

 

You can however, notice how so many Indians and Chinese and Japanese become CEO's and Presidents and have high-ranking jobs.

 

And how people from Texas and Kentucky do not.

 

Then again, this could all be a generalization, and I am comparing the smartest people in China with the dumbest people in America. :/

[HeadshotMagnet]

Im not into politics so I really dont care about the economy unless Im like buying a house or finding a job when Im older.

[Dark]

So why did you just post in this thread?

 

Right, to increase your post count by 1. I get it.

[OMGAKITTY]

Ehh' date=' you are partially right in that sense.

 

But you can't use people from the slums and villages of these countries as comparison either.

 

You can't really compare who is smarter or who has the higher average smartness.

 

You can however, notice how so many Indians and Chinese and Japanese become CEO's and Presidents and have high-ranking jobs.

 

And how people from Texas and Kentucky do not.

 

Then again, this could all be a generalization, and I am comparing the smartest people in China with the dumbest people in America. :/

[/quote']

 

Exactly. Same thing 2mil minutes did. They gave a bunch of statistics on American education, without ever giving the similar results for the other two countries. Sure, there are a lot of bright people from India/China/Japan, but there are also dumbasses out there. You just don't see them because you don't live there. :/

[Kitty]

hmm i didn't think i was hated.. oh well i hate politics anyway.. i just say i'ma republican cuz my stated voted.. 4 that republican guy and sarah palin...

[BehindTheMask]

Ehh' date=' you are partially right in that sense.

 

But you can't use people from the slums and villages of these countries as comparison either.

 

You can't really compare who is smarter or who has the higher average smartness.

 

You can however, notice how so many Indians and Chinese and Japanese become CEO's and Presidents and have high-ranking jobs.

 

And how people from Texas and Kentucky do not.

 

Then again, this could all be a generalization, and I am comparing the smartest people in China with the dumbest people in America. :/

[/quote']

 

Exactly. Same thing 2mil minutes did. They gave a bunch of statistics on American education, without ever giving the similar results for the other two countries. Sure, there are a lot of bright people from India/China/Japan, but there are also dumbasses out there. You just don't see them because you don't live there. :/

 

Also, the fact that if you aren't smart enough you have to drop out of school.

 

This throws off "general" education.

[Mizore-Shirayuki]

why do people care

[OMGAKITTY]

why do people care

 

You're right. Its stupid to care about the man who is going to be running one of the most powerful countries in the world. Lets all go watch pokemon instead.