E-Hero Airman! [Elemental Hero Stratos]

[Dr. Cakey]

 

So, I was thinking. With D-Hero Malicious @ 2 and Heroes not exactly Tiered, do you think this could take the bold leap to...Semi-Limit it?

 

To continue, discuss.

[Toffee.]

I think the reason this was put@1 was because it searches for itself.

I dunno, I just remember this was put@1 in like mid-2007.

[BDKMRV]

This will not hit Semi.

If it doesn, then so will RotA.

[Captain Lawless]

won't get semi'd, although it'd be cool.

Unless you're teching Winds (like Stardust, Raiza, etc), he's one of the few

wind heroes ran, and a rare target for Great Tornado.

[Kira the Savior]

Self searching 1800 beater with a random side effect that may become MST. Or worse. Not getting off the limit list.

[Dr. Cakey]

I'm not saying its a bad card, obviously it's excellent, but what, does it @ 2 make Heroes Tier 0? Improve any deck more than by a slight margin?

[TechnoDoomedOne]

At 1 it's a good monster that gives +0 and searches.

At 2 it's a +1 that searches.

[Dr. Cakey]

At 1 it's a good monster that gives +0 and searches.

At 2 it's a +1 that searches.

 

...@ 1 it is also a +1 that searches. So what if it searches itself? Yes, that makes it much better, but it doesn't give you any advantage that can be immediately abused. i.e. it is not Flamvell Firedog.

 

Which is @ 3.

[Kira the Savior]

At 1 it's a good monster that gives +0 and searches.

At 2 it's a +1 that searches.

 

...@ 1 it is also a +1 that searches. So what if it searches itself? Yes' date=' that makes it much better, but it doesn't give you any advantage that can be immediately abused. i.e. it is not Flamvell Firedog.

 

Which is @ 3.

[/quote']

 

Flamevell Dog isn't a warrior, and is arguably also worthy of being limited

[Toffee.]

At 1 it's a good monster that gives +0 and searches.

At 2 it's a +1 that searches.

 

...@ 1 it is also a +1 that searches. So what if it searches itself? Yes' date=' that makes it much better, but it doesn't give you any advantage that can be immediately abused. i.e. it is not Flamvell Firedog.

 

Which is @ 3.

[/quote']

 

Flamevell Dog isn't a warrior, and is arguably also worthy of being limited

 

Kira is amazing at thinking like Konami.

Limit Firedog and keep Rekindling@3

[Kira the Savior]

At 1 it's a good monster that gives +0 and searches.

At 2 it's a +1 that searches.

 

...@ 1 it is also a +1 that searches. So what if it searches itself? Yes' date=' that makes it much better, but it doesn't give you any advantage that can be immediately abused. i.e. it is not Flamvell Firedog.

 

Which is @ 3.

[/quote']

 

Flamevell Dog isn't a warrior, and is arguably also worthy of being limited

 

Kira is amazing at thinking like Konami.

Limit Firedog and keep Rekindling@3

 

Rekindling should have been. Banned before it was even printed

[Toffee.]

At 1 it's a good monster that gives +0 and searches.

At 2 it's a +1 that searches.

 

...@ 1 it is also a +1 that searches. So what if it searches itself? Yes' date=' that makes it much better, but it doesn't give you any advantage that can be immediately abused. i.e. it is not Flamvell Firedog.

 

Which is @ 3.

[/quote']

 

Flamevell Dog isn't a warrior, and is arguably also worthy of being limited

 

Kira is amazing at thinking like Konami.

Limit Firedog and keep Rekindling@3

 

Rekindling should have been. Banned before it was even printed

 

Rekindling gives Konami a reason for this gimmic:

Make a slow-ish archtype with effects that dont make sence, and then print 1 or 2 supporting cards that lets them be overkill, while still not being metaworthy.

[Expelsword]

This card can search any Hero...

 

it should be in all Hero decks

[Flame Dragon]

Only way for this to go to 3 is if it couldn't search itself.

 

Side from that if your deck uses Heros you'll use this.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

Searching itself is a stupid idea, unless you play Ultimate Offering, a card that shouldn't be played in Hero decks. In summary, should be @3.

[Canadian]

This card can search any Hero...

 

it should be in all Hero decks

 

My god, he's so right....

[Mr. Judgment Dragon]

If it couldn't search another copy of itself, this would be fine at 3. It is still a great card though.

[ihop]

Searchable as hell, creates rediculous card advantage with revival cards.

Yeah, ought to be at 1.

[Thomas★Zero]

Not so sure since I think this + Plasma/Dogma(lv8?) + Traded-in/destiny draw gives you still a good draw engine

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

i want this at 3.

Ban Malicious and D-Draw.

This to 3.

 

its all i want for Christmas.

Knowing Konami, the opposite will happen.

[Flame Dragon]

i want this at 3.

Ban Malicious and D-Draw.

This to 3.

 

its all i want for Christmas.

Knowing Konami' date=' the opposite will happen.

[/quote']

Why ban Malicious when putting it at 1 will do the same thing? Why ban D-Draw when the only way you can use it is if you run a fair number of a monsters from a meh archtype?

 

But the best question is why ban them and move this to 3 when those 2 have nothing to do with why this was put at 1 in the first place.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

yes i know, but its his best use. apart from searching for himself.

that would make Little City or Big City that much more fun.

[Azmodius]

Great card can set up insane plays, but not so good this format.

[Dr. Cakey]

My main question remains unanswered: how does this searching itself make it broken?

[Expelsword]

I dunno, I guess deck thinning isn't allowed...