Thomas★Zero Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 [img]http://www.collectorscache.com/StoreModules/ProductImages/830/desperatetag.jpg[/img] Very hand in warrior deck/ decks that has a high number of warrior type monsters in. [DISC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 Bergzak must love this card. Still, it seems pretty... I dunno... it just seems like this does not have a high success rate as anything more than stalling... though, the battle damage at 0 is nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 it's not good. type specific and from hand isnt too good. if it was graveyard or deck then it might have some potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 Lol @ the lack of the card name in the title. If only it summoned from the Deck... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 [quote name='~King Crouton~' timestamp='1286979751' post='4701485'] Lol @ the lack of the card name in the title. If only it summoned from the Deck... [/quote] I completely agree with this. The topic is against the forum rules and the card blows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 [quote name='~King Crouton~' timestamp='1286979751' post='4701485'] Lol @ the lack of the card name in the title. [/quote] This. You're lucky hikaru's old "+20 warns to Kingdom Neos if he does this" rule isn't in effect right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 If a Warrior-Type version of Black Knight Dark could work(which it cant), this would be pretty hilarious in said deck. [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1286982842' post='4701548'] This. You're lucky hikaru's old "+20 warns to Kingdom Neos if he does this" rule isn't in effect right now. [/quote] lolkingdomneos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted October 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 I did add this cards name in sub heading you know -__-" its just having a fun title name so your warn is out of line and therefore nulled >:/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 [quote name='kingdom Neos' timestamp='1286994552' post='4702007'] I did add this cards name in sub heading you know -__-" its just having a fun title name so your warn is out of line and therefore nulled >:/ [/quote] Dude, titles without the card name IN them are illegal. It doesn't matter if oyu put it in that small part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 [quote name='kingdom Neos' timestamp='1286994552' post='4702007'] I did add this cards name in sub heading you know -__-" its just having a fun title name so your warn is out of line and therefore nulled >:/ [/quote] Yes, ever since my idea to name a topic "Do a [B]Barrel[/B] Roll! Flame [b]Dragon[/b] recommends it!", which was a discussion about [i]Barrel Dragon[/i], and was completely fine as you could still search Barrel Dragon and it would still come up, got way out of hand with the 100+ users(Even Crab Helmet contributed to this) trying to 're-make' the idea in a more and more confusing way, they had to make a rule for. It was humorous at first, but then it just got ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 Hero Signal is better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.