Toffee. Posted April 17, 2013 Report Share Posted April 17, 2013 Other than the blue-ish white hair-To be fair, the artwork posted isn't even HD yet.So the blue-ish tint likely doesn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted April 17, 2013 Report Share Posted April 17, 2013 The second effect is only applied while face-up correct? So.... NS this, target with anything, instant BEWD Huh, this looks interesting: edit: Play it, SS a BEWD, protect your monsters, Maiden dies, get another BEWD :P _____ Blue-Eyes Village? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted April 17, 2013 Report Share Posted April 17, 2013 It's not really all that dis-similar; same general facial structure, white hair, blue-eyes... the biggest difference is clothing, and that's because a simple robe is too boring for Yugimons. OT: Wonder Wand is the best play with this thing that I see. Summon, equips, Blue-Eyes, draw 2. 3 cards of deck thin, a +1 overall, and if this is first turn that presents a problem. This card isn't broken, but it is sorely needed. The eyes are different. Not even the size, but they are less pointy. The face looks fatter, which I guess means she is older, but why still. The hair is less fluffy against her head. The expression in the card is kinda solemn, as opposed to Kisara's quiet self. The clothes are completely unexpected. To make reference to the show, I expected something Egyptian-looking or at least something similar to Mana's for clothes. I gotta post this reminder at the end of this comment: I still think it's a pretty cool image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted April 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2013 found it!summon maiden, e-tele into Raizbellt the Regulator(http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Raizbellt_the_Regulator), target Maiden to make it lv4, SS Blue-Eyes, make Ancient Sacred Wyvern = GAEM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mido9 Posted April 17, 2013 Report Share Posted April 17, 2013 kinka byo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted April 17, 2013 Report Share Posted April 17, 2013 It only works for face-up on the field now. Tbh, its more balanced that way. I was actually just about to post about the e-tele into the star tuner, glad someone else realized it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted April 18, 2013 Report Share Posted April 18, 2013 Looks a little like Kisara, I guess. But anyways: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted April 18, 2013 Report Share Posted April 18, 2013 Piper Blue-Eyes can technically be a deck can't it with this? Hmm... might have to test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justduelist Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 kinka byo ruling states that it continues to target the card while its on the field so i dont see why it wouldnt get its effect of... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 [quote name="justduelist" post="6186664" timestamp="1366780328"]kinka byo ruling states that it continues to target the card while its on the field so i dont see why it wouldnt get its effect of...[/quote] "When an effect targets" The targeting is already over and connected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 It doesn't work with Kinka-byo/cotH/limit reverse etc. It needs to be targeted after it hits the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I don't really get how this targetting works and what makes it still that target and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I don't really get how this targetting works and what makes it still that target and stuff. It's not that hard: 1. Maiden is already face-up on the field. 2. Chain Link 1 is an effect that targets Blue-Eyes maiden on the field 3. Chain Link 2 is maiden's effect that summons BEWD 4. Resolves backwards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 It's not that hard: 1. Maiden is already face-up on the field. 2. Chain Link 1 is an effect that targets Blue-Eyes maiden on the field 3. Chain Link 2 is maiden's effect that summons BEWD 4. Resolves backwards I'm talking about why CotH wouldn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 It's not that hard: 1. Maiden is already face-up on the field. 2. Chain Link 1 is an effect that targets Blue-Eyes maiden on the field 3. Chain Link 2 is maiden's effect that summons BEWD 4. Resolves backwards Are you sure this is a quick effect though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'm talking about why CotH wouldn't work. Um for the same reason. It needs to target as something like Quick or Ignition, not a continuous target. Are you sure this is a quick effect though? If the official wording is like that, then yes. Because it's a "when" Unlike "after resolving" (Spirit Reaper) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 If the official wording is like that, then yes. Because it's a "when" Sangan is a "When". It's not Quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Sangan is a "When". It's not Quick. You can't compare it to Sangan. edit: wiat edit2: Yes it is quick. I can't find a good example but it is quick because of that wording. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 You can't compare it to Sangan. edit: wiat I'm not comparing it to Sangan. If the official wording is like that, then yes. Because it's a "when" Unlike "after resolving" (Spirit Reaper) You complain to me for comparing it to another trigger when you compare it to a continuous effect .-. When =/= Quick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'm not comparing it to Sangan. You complain to me for comparing it to another trigger when you compare it to a continuous effect .-. When =/= Quick I'm not saying it is quick because it uses the word "When" specifically. I'm saying its quick because you must activate it in response to an effect that targets it ("when" in that sense), which is why it is quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'm not saying it is quick because it uses the word "When" specifically. I'm saying its quick because you must activate it in response to an effect that targets it ("when" in that sense), which is why it is quick. I don't see anything that indicates this though. By your logic Sangan activates in response to an action that sends it to the Graveyard, like E-Con tributing it. As is I see no indication of it being a Quick Effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I don't see anything that indicates this though. By your logic Sangan activates in response to an action that sends it to the Graveyard, like E-Con tributing it. As is I see no indication of it being a Quick Effect. Sangan activates after that action has performed. BEM activates IN RESPONSE to the effect targeting it. For example, Blah [Trap Card] When a monster you control is targeted by a card effect: Negate the activation and if you do, destroy it. BEM is like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 It's most certainly a trigger effect. When something targets it, it can trigger in response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I think i'm confused about Trigger and Quick effects, but the way it works is something like what I've been saying. Edit2: I still think it's Quick: Quick Effect (誘発即時効果, Yūhatsu Sokuji Kōka; previously known as Multi-Trigger Effect in the TCG) is the only Monster Effect that are Spell Speed 2. It is any monster effect that could be activated during Summon negation window, or could be chained "in response" to another activation. Well, that's how it works on YGOPro, and that's probably how it should be considering how it's worded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Sangan activates after that action has performed. BEM activates IN RESPONSE to the effect targeting it. For example, Blah [Trap Card] When a monster you control is targeted by a card effect: Negate the activation and if you do, destroy it. BEM is like that. No it's not. Blah actually negates the card and functions differently. Not only that, Blah is a trap card and functions as such by game mechanics. BEM doesn't interact with the card at all. As I see it BEM looks like a trigger and not a quick. You haven't shown me anything saying otherwise :/It's most certainly a trigger effect. When something targets it, it can trigger in response. Triggers don't trigger in response though. EX: Sangan. Wind Up Factory. Any trigger effect that meets it's trigger from an activating card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.