Zazubat Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 which is why the "lol" exists in my post :P Ugh, I hate when people use lol as meaning not being serious, I can never tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 The Organization says Pot of Duplicity, so I'd go with that.Unsure how I feel about this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 They should make it a Secret Rare just to troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 So I was right when I thought it was types. How 'bout that? Much more usable, but still very limiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 I want 3 for my Synchrons <3 Lessee if the type restriction is actually enough to balance it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 Lessee if the type restriction is actually enough to balance it.Quickdraw Synchron, Level Eater, and Junk WarriorHeh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 Quickdraw Synchron, Level Eater, and Junk Warrior Heh... Don't forget Veiler, Ryko, Dandylion and Debris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 So what's the consensus here? What the fuck does different kinds mean? Normal Monsters, Effect Monsters, Synchros, Fusions, Rituals and Xyzs? Or is it some error in translating? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 So what's the consensus here? What the fuck does different kinds mean? Normal Monsters, Effect Monsters, Synchros, Fusions, Rituals and Xyzs? Or is it some error in translating? It's already been stated multiple times that it means types like Winged Beast. OP just didn't update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 So what's the consensus here? What the fuck does different kinds mean? Normal Monsters, Effect Monsters, Synchros, Fusions, Rituals and Xyzs? Or is it some error in translating?We said it was Type on the other page. :v Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 It said "3 different kinds", so I was under the impression they meant Synchro, Fusion, Ritual, etc But if it's different Types, I could still see it being played. looking at all of this I think it just means 3 different monsters where you can't use this with multiple copies of the same monster even if that sort of looks like its stating the obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 looking at all of this I think it just means 3 different monsters where you can't use this with multiple copies of the same monster even if that sort of looks like its stating the obvious. We said it was Type on the other page. :v It's already been stated multiple times that it means types like Winged Beast. OP just didn't update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pchi Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 >3 different Kinds So.... Its only going to be played in a deck that plays Instant Fusion to make a Synchro, then overlay that monster for an Xyz. AKA Armz.dek ..... Wat. No, it'd be played in Rabbit.dek, but since it's already established it works with different Types, not kinds, then it can be included in other varieties of deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 looking at all of this I think it just means 3 different monsters where you can't use this with multiple copies of the same monster even if that sort of looks like its stating the obvious. That would be absolutely terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKaitoKid Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 Combos amazingly with Duality & Card Car. Decent card don;t know how much play it will see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 I think I'll stick with Avarice, kthx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 May try Frognarchs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 I think I'll stick with Avarice, kthx. Well duh, the question isn't whether you'd use this in place of avarice, but with avarice. After all some decks like multiple avarices, even if the extras have drawbacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proto Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 Think it'd work in like.. Evilswarms? I dunno, the whole Battle Phase thing'll probably make it unfeasible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 Scrap Beast/Chimera - BeastScrap Dragon/Twin Dragon/Atomic - DragonScrap Goblin - Beast WarriorHeh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 Bujins might probably use it. Then again, Avarice is a better option for them, and even that isn't used in the Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted June 19, 2013 Report Share Posted June 19, 2013 Bujins might probably use it. Then again, Avarice is a better option for them, and even that isn't used in the Deck.Why would they actually ever want to use this? I'm curious why you would like to ruin the set-up that Bujin actually have. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted June 19, 2013 Report Share Posted June 19, 2013 Why would they actually ever want to use this? I'm curious why you would like to ruin the set-up that Bujin actually have. =/ Implying that I would actually use it. I'm just throwing potential ideas out of the open, regardless of how bad they are. I even did say that they're better off using Avarice and even then, they don't use Avarice. With this logic in mind, Duplicity<Avarice<<Bujins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMmighty169 Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 According to yugioh wikia it says target 3 types... so that means hieratics, fire fist, blackwings... don't get to use it... it means.. decks like lightsworns... wind-ups... do. this should be interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.