evil cucumber Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 When a monster(s) with 1400 or less ATK is Normal Summoned orSpecial Summoned: Destroy those monsters with 1400 or less ATK. This card must be face-up on the field to activate and to resolve this effect. Anyone tried this in Qliphs or Shaddolls? Sounds like a fun idea to pull this against ba Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 Why would this works against Qlis? Sorry if I'm being very ignorant, but I thought Qlis go to 1800 if SS'd and even if they did go to 1400, their effect would protect them from this card. As for Shaddolls... I'm even less familiar with them, so I'll just stop talking here. ...it'd kill my deskbots/SH samurais tho... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil cucumber Posted February 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 I meant to put this on a qli or doll deck...not to use against them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 He means "in" not "on". Ideally, it looks good on paper, forcing out a karma cut or PWWB, but wasting a normal summon on it when you could be using a Disk seems bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 Ha! Ok, completely changes things, though I'm still no metagame expert, so I still can't say much. What I can say is that since both of those decks have fast engines, it is realistically possible to get this in hand early game, but only after 2-3 turns, which could make it moot. This would be laughably fun to use against BAs though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil cucumber Posted February 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 He means "in" not "on". Ideally, it looks good on paper, forcing out a karma cut or PWWB, but wasting a normal summon on it when you could be using a Disk seems bad Sorry for that, my english is soo bad :( That doesnt make a problem i guess, since theres the field that allows you to normal summon a qli in addition to your normal summon (also shaddolls proved that they dont care about normal summons anymore..) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 This is revivable with Ayers Rock Sunrise, so that is pretty awesome. If a deck comes up using it, I can see this in side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 And then I summon Farfa and banish it and continue on my merry way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 And then I summon Farfa and banish it and continue on my merry way. Only 1 turn removal and Farfa is a one-turn occurence, plus it would suck it up for another monster you control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 6, 2015 Report Share Posted February 6, 2015 Only 1 turn removal-If said Tiger leaves the field, it would be a huge opening for him to make plays.Just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 If said Tiger leaves the field, it would be a huge opening for him to make plays. Just sayin' Yes but you could say that about any other monster you control >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Yes but you could say that about any other monster you control >.>But it's a moot point.If your lone Tiger leaves the field, he is now free to make whatever plays he wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.