ihop Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 Are you blind? Can you clearly not see I said both need to be at 1 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 Are you blind? Can you clearly not see I said both need to be at 1 Are you blind? Go ahead and read what you quoted again. I specifically said IF should not be at three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 Are you blind? Go ahead and read what you quoted again. I specifically said IF should not be at three. Why are you disagreeing with me then!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 He's not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazooie Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 Why are you disagreeing with me then!!! Um... He isn't. There was a post above his... Between your's and his. Just um... Take a look at that. ^^' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 Get over yourself. I was talking to Yamiegg, who had done the previous post I was directly referencing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 Are you blind? Go ahead and read what you quoted again. I specifically said IF should not be at three. Yes...I should not respond to posts 3 in the morning. Apologies mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 I'm not sure how I feel about Super Rejuvenation being at anything other than 0-1. Even without the D-Rulers, it's a card that can instantly become broken any time there's some new dragon support that involves discarding. Sinister Serpent might as well be at three as well, because it's hardly useful anymore, and isn't anything game-breaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 Rejuv has always been fine at one. It's a nice little boost to Red Eyes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Yamiegg Posted May 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 I don't see how IF deserves to be @1 since in my opinion all banlist decisions should be based on impact. Why does everyone seem to think that it's broken? It's just an instant Xyz/Synchro-material card. Outside of Norden there are no good targets for it, and I wouldn't put it @1 on the premise that there just might be good targets released inb the future because this list is for post Mega-Tins TCG only. Rejuvinationwise, there's no "discarding dragons" support coming out anytime soon that I'm aware of, and even if there is, I stress that this is for post Mega-Tins and no further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 You could compromise and make it semi. If we are being realistic, that would be the best move along with Noden to 1. If it is still being abused, then it could take a further dip to limited, if not, it could stay where it is. 3 simply enables too much too consistently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted May 31, 2015 Report Share Posted May 31, 2015 IF is the best way to get Noden out. Having it @3 is three time the propobility of opening it. Also monsters are easier recycled than Spells. Noden at three if one of the two I strongly feel Rejuv and Super Poly belong at 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Guys, stop complaining about Noden. IF is the ONLY reason it sees play. Instant Fusion is the source of everything regarding Noden OTKs/Loops/FTKs/whatever, and if you can't see that, then you shouldn't be in this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Guys, stop complaining about Noden. IF is the ONLY reason it sees play. Instant Fusion is the source of everything regarding Noden OTKs/Loops/FTKs/whatever, and if you can't see that, then you shouldn't be in this topic. Well the occasional super poly or infernity teaching poly too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Well the occasional super poly or infernity teaching poly too First is banned. Second is a relatively fair example because a teched poly will just brick them even more, and if not, they are summoning it by normal means so it's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 First is not banned. Noden has no bearing on TCG till its unbanned, in which case OCG is our only land mark. 2 XYZ into Noden occurs enough. Ignite Infernity or Infernal Heroes run Blazeman actully. It doesn't clog at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 First is not banned. Noden has no bearing on TCG till its unbanned, in which case OCG is our only land mark. 2 XYZ into Noden occurs enough. Ignite Infernity or Infernal Heroes run Blazeman actully. It doesn't clog at all Personal Banlists on here are assumed TCG unless otherwise stated. Furthermore, this specific one assesses an unknown format post-Mega tins where Noden is fully legal. Super Poly is banned in TCG. Polying into Noden requires a fair amount of effort instead of just plopping down IF and plussing off of it. tl;dr - we do not, nor will we ever care about your OCG nonsense. Most of us will never play in that format, nor care to. Bringing your ocg crap into a topic designed to be regarding the TCG is just skewing the topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 It's not awful, and I'd really like some of these changes (Rai-Oh, Birdman, Divine Wind, Rabbit, Diva, maybe even Stratos), but I really cringed at REDMD at 2. That card shouldn't even exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Personal Banlists on here are assumed TCG unless otherwise stated. Furthermore, this specific one assesses an unknown format post-Mega tins where Noden is fully legal. Super Poly is banned in TCG. Polying into Noden requires a fair amount of effort instead of just plopping down IF and plussing off of it. tl;dr - we do not, nor will we ever care about your OCG nonsense. Most of us will never play in that format, nor care to. Bringing your ocg crap into a topic designed to be regarding the TCG is just skewing the topic. There's are so many things wrong with this statement. Said format is bad for a few reason. If you ever did anything science, you should know changing multiple variables is bad. We have I ide what the Banlist might do. Super poly could come back. If you want to "fix" TCG you should do it with the existing TCG card pool Poly into Noden is not slow. Them Lavaval chains sitting there dead. If you weren't ignorant you'd know that Ignite Infernity can do it with ease. But since TCG took a shit on Infernity, this too is a bad discussion All I have to say to this blatent ignorism is this: "your TCG copied 90% of the Crap's list last format" Drops micIt's not awful, and I'd really like some of these changes (Rai-Oh, Birdman, Divine Wind, Rabbit, Diva, maybe even Stratos), but I really cringed at REDMD at 2. That card shouldn't even exist. Red murder is @1 unless you managed to steal a V-jump and something changed in July's list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 TEW. Piss off. We had this talk before you were banned. No one gives the SLIGHTEST OF FUCKS about OCG on this forum (or your opinion on the "fictional" format for that matter) so either adjust to our TCG and/or speculative TCG discussions, or kindly get the fuck out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 TEW. Piss off. We had this talk before you were banned. No one gives the SLIGHTEST OF f***S about OCG on this forum (or your opinion on the "fictional" format for that matter) so either adjust to our TCG and/or speculative TCG discussions, or kindly get the f*** out. Not an opinion mate. It's unhealthy to make Banlist choices on Noden before he even gets here. Klav please be a little more considerate, there's no need for such harshness. I would however like to note you addressed none of the points I made and instead just decide ad hom was the best you could aim for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Not an opinion mate. It's unhealthy to make Banlist choices on Noden before he even gets here. Klav please be a little more considerate, there's no need for such harshness. I would however like to note you addressed none of the points I made and instead just decide ad hom was the best you could aim for If you genuinely believe Super Poly might get unbanned in TCG you know literally nothing about the current gamestate (which is true). Only banlist change that can happen before Norden comes out here is Instant Fusion getting [i]banned[/i] pre-emptively, which won't happen either since Konami wants to sell the tins. It's all simple deduction, which seems you're not used to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 I dunno guys, I think REDMD to 2 is a great idea and I wholeheartedly approve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 If you genuinely believe Super Poly might get unbanned in TCG you know literally nothing about the current gamestate (which is true). Only banlist change that can happen before Norden comes out here is Instant Fusion getting banned pre-emptively, which won't happen either since Konami wants to sell the tins. It's all simple deduction, which seems you're not used to. Right cause the number of people who agree that Super poly was rightfully banned is so damn high....no point arguing with someone who can't fit simple logic through their thick head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted June 1, 2015 Report Share Posted June 1, 2015 Right cause the number of people who agree that Super poly was rightfully banned is so damn high....no point arguing with someone who can't fit simple logic through their thick headA lot of people in the TCG do believe that Super Poly was rightfully banned. No-one wants to sit through a format with decks having access to Super Poly since it isn't a healthy form of removal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.