evilhorus Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 Which is Better in the Current Meta? Which is better in its own deck?Vote in the PollDiscuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L33t Jenkins Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 JD: Pros: Clears the field instnatly for direct damage. Lightsworn mill effcts make it easy to summon. Decent stats.Cons: costs a slight chunk of Lp to activate it's effect.DaD: Pros: Decent stats. Can easily clean the fieldCons: Needs an exact amount of monsters. Overall i think Judgement Dragon has the overall advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrie Lupia Blitzer Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 JD is more powerful, DAD is more splashable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted February 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 Yes, both of you are correct, but DAD Decks are a midge bit less expensive than Sworns (according to International sellers on eBay), so you have a bigger chance of running into DAD than sworns, but which is better and more consistent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 Cons: costs a slight chunk of Lp to activate it's effect. That's the only con you can think of? Try it needs 4 different LS and it will be milled more times than not. but which is better and more consistent? TeleDAD > LS. To answer the question, DAD is better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 DAD is better because it is more splashable and more consistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 Which is Better in the Current Meta? Which is better in its own deck?Vote in the PollDiscuss. Considering the fact that in the last several SJC's, at least 10 people used Tele-DAD, so DAD is immensely superior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 JD is more powerful' date=' DAD is more splashable.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 JD is more powerful' date=' DAD is more splashable.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logmon1 Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 JD is more powerful' date=' DAD is more splashable.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 JD is more powerful' date=' DAD is more splashable.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 JD is a better overall Card but DaD is more abundant Current format is eating the Speed if Tele Dad but Plaugesworn is hiding in the shadows... JD as an overall card DaD as a Meta maker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 How many of these threads are going to be posted? Heck, I'd rather have DaD banned to prevent threads like this from being posted, nevermind the fact that its overpowered. Dark Armed Dragon is better in the Current Meta, but Judgment Dragon is better in its own Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 Both are pinnacles of poor design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 Both are pinnacles of poor design. Theyre both rectangles, they cant fall over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 DAD is way better... both can clean the field by a cost. but judgement dragon needs to be in a lightsworn deck..on the other hand... dark armed dragon works with DARK mosnters.. one of the most abundant atributes in the game that has lots of strategyes... in fact.. it should be limited to 1 per deck..(and so should stardust >: ( ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 DAD is way better... both can clean the field by a cost. but judgement dragon needs to be in a lightsworn deck..on the other hand... dark armed dragon works with DARK mosnters.. one of the most abundant atributes in the game that has lots of strategyes... in fact.. it should be limited to 1 per deck..(and so should stardust >: ( ) I am so glad you don't work for Konami. Just for the record, there is absolutely no reason to limit a good, balanced card like Stardust Dragon. Dark Armed Dragon should be banned; Judgment Dragon should not be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 I can't believe this is actually being discussed… Both are pinnacles of poor design. Theyre both rectangles' date=' they cant fall over[/quote'] They lack depth, trying standing one up by itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 DAD is way better... both can clean the field by a cost. but judgement dragon needs to be in a lightsworn deck..on the other hand... dark armed dragon works with DARK mosnters.. one of the most abundant atributes in the game that has lots of strategyes... in fact.. it should be limited to 1 per deck..(and so should stardust >: ( ) I am so glad you don't work for Konami. Just for the record' date=' there is absolutely no reason to limit a good, balanced card like Stardust Dragon. Dark Armed Dragon should be banned; Judgment Dragon should not be banned.[/quote'] Dark Armed Dragon should NOT be banned. it sure can be good at destroying the field but if you look closely, it only invincible when is backed up with stardust and solemn judgement... otherwise its just a hard to get destroyer which is good. just another card destroying effect in the game.... look at the cheapest and easiest to get cards in the combo before you try tu shut me up. also.. I based my previews rate in playability with different cards.. if you put attension to another fact... lots of cards in the game negate target effects like DAD ... judgement dragon will only send everything to the graveyard... now reflect a little about it -_-" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 DAD is way better... both can clean the field by a cost. but judgement dragon needs to be in a lightsworn deck..on the other hand... dark armed dragon works with DARK mosnters.. one of the most abundant atributes in the game that has lots of strategyes... in fact.. it should be limited to 1 per deck..(and so should stardust >: ( ) I am so glad you don't work for Konami. Just for the record' date=' there is absolutely no reason to limit a good, balanced card like Stardust Dragon. Dark Armed Dragon should be banned; Judgment Dragon should not be banned.[/quote'] Dark Armed Dragon should NOT be banned. it sure can be good at destroying the field but if you look closely, it only invincible when is backed up with stardust and solemn judgement... otherwise its just a hard to get destroyer which is good. just another card destroying effect in the game.... look at the cheapest and easiest to get cards in the combo before you try tu shut me up. also.. I based my previews rate in playability with different cards.. if you put attension to another fact... lots of cards in the game negate target effects like DAD ... judgement dragon will only send everything to the graveyard... now reflect a little about it -_-" I pretty much stopped paying attention to your post after the first line. You know, the unbelievably incorrect one? DaD should be banned. You're like the George Bush of Yu-Gi-Oh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 Well, he has a slight point. Synchros are really what's responsible for this meta, and they're really what made radical changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 star: read everything or don't say anything....I just posted my opinion so you don't have to put attension to it if you dont want to, now stop insulting me. -_-" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 LS should play gold sarco the times it takes to get the card should be enough to have 4 different LS in the grave and that way you are 100% sure you'll get him and it won't be milled. DAD is better, anytime you can sp summon him you can use his effect you won't always have 1000LP specially in this meta. JD kills your own cards while DAD gets to chose. And DAD is easier to sp summon most of the cards designed to control the number of darks in the grave are better than the cards randomly milling your deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 star: read everything or don't say anything....I just posted my opinion so you don't have to put attension to it if you dont want to' date=' now stop insulting me. -_-"[/quote'] I kind of skimmed through it. I'm clearly stating that DaD definitely needs to be banned, regardless of how much of an impact it is making at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrie Lupia Blitzer Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 I can't believe this is actually being discussed… Both are pinnacles of poor design. Theyre both rectangles' date=' they cant fall over[/quote'] They lack depth, trying standing one up by itself. They do have depth. But not much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.