Bringerofcake Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 I realize that there have been topics about this before, but the discussion in this thread should be centered around two questions: 1. Should Magic Cylinder continue to be Limited?2. Provided Magic Cylinder was unlimited, would it be run in today's meta? Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 If it were unlimited, It might be worth siding agaisnt Glads. Other then that, IDK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 its not even a bad card:S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Can someone tell me YCM's obsession with Magic Cylinder? <_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 1. Should Magic Cylinder continue to be Limited?Its a situational' date=' reverse-OTK card. 2. Provided Magic Cylinder was unlimited, would it be run in today's meta?Do we REALLY want people running this in 3s? >__> its not even a bad card:SIts just that there are better options. Can someone tell me YCM's obsession with Magic Cylinder? <_<....Somehow, I think I have something to do with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 I personally think it's a pretty good card, but shouldn't be run in threes. But it's situational though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 At 3 this thing can give a ridiculous amount of burn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 At 3 this thing can give a ridiculous amount of burn.Not to mention its annoying' date=' and can [i']easily[/i] turn the game in favor of who ever can use all 3 agenst the Opponent first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 I vote it goes to Semi. It can reverse the game. That's both the reason why to semi it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Im not understanding why it is Limited. If it is a situational Reverse OTK, then it should be put to 3, to discourage OTKs and slow the game down a bit so that other decks can have the opportunity to actually be competitive again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 I vote it goes to Semi. It can reverse the game. That's both the reason why to semi it.But with Konami's logic:-OTKs are bad-Cards that prevent OTKs are good-Cards that do both are semi-limited.Im not understanding why it is Limited. If it is a situational Reverse OTK' date=' then it should be put to 3, to discourage OTKs and slow the game down a bit so that other decks can have the opportunity to actually be competitive again.[/quote']If they did that, it would defeat the purpose of players spending The Money on cards like JD and DAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkaiser Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Lol @ DAD not blowing up Backfield before attacking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 I loved this card.Played a RFP Deck. Opponent removed my entire deck from play, and all of his own. Summoned a guy that gets 100 for every RFP.Yay for MC =D This was before I was running the deck I run now, so ya... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Not a bad card. But not a good one either. I see the problesm in Unlimiting it, but I mean, try it for one banlist, change back for the next if needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 More than one of this will be pretty stupid. Remember Burn Decks ... yeah .. those who also got Starlight Road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 it will stay at 1. it's a hefty burn cost.but, if it say, went to 3. i can see people maindecking Barrel Behind the Door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warden Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Magic Cylinder as said before, it's a turn-around and cheap burn, always will be. But thanks to the S/T destruction about and the fact that this is un-chainable, it would pose less of a threat at Semi then at Unlimited, because Unlimited can make it a little to get rid of them all (unless you use Noblemen of Extermination, but I doubt people do). Semi makes it less likely to appear but still pose the same threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KuroKibo Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 For me, if Magic Cylinder's unlimited, you'll toast. I mean, if you have a powerful monster (say its ATK is 4000) and you attack your opponent then he activates Magic Cylinder he'll toast you. Say he has 3 Magic Cylinders in the field and you'll die in 2 turns. Pretty dangerous card in unlimited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 its alot like solemn, at three it would be virtally a staple, at 1 its not really worth it as their is better options Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombiepromking Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 its alot like solemn' date=' at three it would be virtally a staple, at 1 its not really worth it as their is better options[/quote'] Q4E Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 its alot like solemn' date=' at three it would be virtally a staple, at 1 its not really worth it as their is better options[/quote'] Except that Solemn is still run at 1... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesirson Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Can someone tell me YCM's obsession with Magic Cylinder? <_<....Somehow' date=' I think I have something to do with this.[/quote']Hello Armz.[spoiler=Does this look familiar?] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Can someone tell me YCM's obsession with Magic Cylinder? <_<....Somehow' date=' I think I have something to do with this.[/quote']Hello Armz.[spoiler=Does this look familiar?] Wow! It's been a while since I saw that one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.