YCM 1v1 Leaderboard Season 19

[Sora1499]

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/307676-leaderboard-winner-sora/

I winned.  :)

[Mugendramon]

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/307724-sora-vs-mugen-leaderboard-start-voting/?do=findComment&comment=6284440

 

And now he lossed.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

I know this is months away, but I'm thinking about changing the way standings are done for next season. The standings would be done in the "soccer" format if I do change it. Just trying to make it a bit more fair so the possibility of someone with a losing record isn't the champion, but I'm not sure how to do that. Suggestions?

[Mugendramon]

Just trying to make it a bit more fair so the possibility of someone with a losing record isn't the champion.

 

I don't get the wording on this sentence, did you miss something?

 

Otherwise it'd be nice if you explained it to me because I simply don't get what you mean.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

I don't get the wording on this sentence, did you miss something?

 

Otherwise it'd be nice if you explained it to me because I simply don't get what you mean.

 

I don't want a 13-14 beating a 12-5 for first place, or for any spot in the top 3. That almost happened last season, and it wouldn't have been far to Zanda. Though, I don't see a way to fix that unless I make it by win percentage, but that gives people the opportunity to face the easiest opponents in order to be undefeated. I'm just trying to fix a flaw before it becomes a serious problem.

[Mugendramon]

I don't want a 13-14 beating a 12-5 for first place, or for any spot in the top 3. That almost happened last season, and it wouldn't have been far to Zanda. Though, I don't see a way to fix that unless I make it by win percentage, but that gives people the opportunity to face the easiest opponents in order to be undefeated. I'm just trying to fix a flaw before it becomes a serious problem.

 

You can always offer more than one category.

 

Best win-loss ratio, most wins, stuff like that. To avoid what you said and people playing only one game and then quitting with a 100% ratio, a certain number of contests played would be required to qualify.

[Instinct]

Win percentage wouldn't work too well since there'd be a few 1-0's, 2-0's, etc. Just a thought but what if everyone starts at "100" or something, and then wins increase that number while losses decrease that number?

 

For example, starting with 100, wins could +10, draws could +5, and losses could -5. This can be changed but in this case, there'd only be 1 value to rank

 

You could still display the win-loss ratio but rank people with the system above

[Nathanael D. Striker]

Win percentage wouldn't work too well since there'd be a few 1-0's, 2-0's, etc. Just a thought but what if everyone starts at "100" or something, and then wins increase that number while losses decrease that number?

 

For example, starting with 100, wins could +10, draws could +5, and losses could -5. This can be changed but in this case, there'd only be 1 value to rank

 

You could still display the win-loss ratio but rank people with the system above

 

That actually sounds like a good idea. Interesting.

 

You can always offer more than one category.

 

Best win-loss ratio, most wins, stuff like that. To avoid what you said and people playing only one game and then quitting with a 100% ratio, a certain number of contests played would be required to qualify.

 

I suppose I could. And I could have sworn that I have a rule that mandates a minimum of 5 1v1s to qualify for a prize.

[Northern Sage]

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/307662-psychic-spirituality-vs-seija-kijin-cards-up-votes-please/?do=findComment&comment=6284782

I win, 3-0.

[Therrion]

Each win = win,

each 3 loses = -1win

12-4 would be a total of 11 wins, 13-14 would be 9 wins. 13-13 > 13-14 by using decimals, or you could simply tie them.

Sounds more fair then currently, at least.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

 

Each win = win,

each 3 loses = -1win

12-4 would be a total of 11 wins, 13-14 would be 9 wins. 13-13 > 13-14 by using decimals, or you could simply tie them.

Sounds more fair then currently, at least.

 

I already put the 13-13 above the 13-14. The problem is if a 14-18 beats a 13-4 (or something like that). Your suggestion sounds similar to Instinct's, so I guess it is a better idea than I first thought. And those ideas make a points back category more doable.

[Therrion]

I haven't looked at any other post other then your post saying you need an idea. I didn't know the 13-13 13-14 was an actual issue, I used it as an example.

13-4 would be 12 points. 14-18 would be 8 points.

Seems fair to me.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

 

I haven't looked at any other post other then your post saying you need an idea. I didn't know the 13-13 13-14 was an actual issue, I used it as an example.

13-4 would be 12 points. 14-18 would be 8 points.

Seems fair to me.

 

Indeed, and that's why I like it. It also solves the problem of people winning the minimum and stopping.

[Therrion]

Would a draw then be a win and a lose, or simply there for note and not serve towards points?

I would imagine a tie being neutral would be fine.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

 

Would a draw then be a win and a lose, or simply there for note and not serve towards points?

I would imagine a tie being neutral would be fine.

 

I've seen draws being given the value of half a win in Football. In Soccer, W=3, D=1, L=0. Maybe we can have W=1, D=0, L=-1 or something like that?

[Therrion]

That would make 3-3-1 a 0 score, correct?

Draws aren't something you should really be proud of, like a win, or suffer from, like a loss, in my eyes. On a scoreboard, I think it should be the same way. Just my opinion.

For those interested, using the

Win: +1, 3 Loses: -1 System

This is how the All-Time Leaderboard would look:

 

[spoiler=All Time (Top 15)]

1)Zextra (25)
2) Renegade (17)
3) Therrion (15)
4) Aix (9)
5) Seija (9)
6) Zanda ( 8 )
7) Sora ( 8 )
8 ) Azn (7)
9) Instinct (6)
10) Toyo (6)
11) Dante (6)
12) Fraxure (4)
13) Kyng (3)
14) Mugen (3)
14) Soulfire (3)

 

 

 

EDIT: Yeah, I was thinking that too. I knew it was like that, but I didn't want to use decimals. It occured to me that with it constantly changing, it would get annoying and thus going by

#, #.33, #.66, Next # would be easier for you to update.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

You know Therrion, that actually looks good. Though, I'd just make L=-1/3 for simplicity sake. So, W=1, D=0, L=-1/3. I like that idea a lot.

[Therrion]

Keep me posted up as Therrion, but for now, I am The Goomy.

[Mehmani]

Can you add me to the Leaderboard? I'd like to compete this season.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

Just go out and compete, Alfred. There are no sign-ups for this.

[Therrion]

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/307727-leaderboard-therrion-vs-ain-therrion-got-raped/?p=6283183

As the title suggests, I got raped by Infinite(Star)Rainbow/Ain.

[ÆƵ–]

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/307933-leader-board-psychic-spirituality-vs-scrooge-finished/?do=findComment&comment=6286570

 

Loss against Scrooge.

[:^)]

My name is now Sasha Braus not Multiloquent (on the all time records), so if you could change it that'd be cool. Also I like the new logo, it's very nice and slick.

[mikel.]

I won: http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/307710-leaderboardmikel-vs-ledtitus-vote/

[Maeriberii Haan]

Hey Striker, I'm hosting a 1v1, but my opponent(Broke.N) hasn't submitted his entry yet, while I'll be gone for several days and am unsure about my ability to be online to put up the entries. Can I ask for a mod's help to edit the topic with the entries?