Out of the Blue

[Dova]

Continuous Spell
Destroy this card if your opponent activates a card or effect that targets a card(s) in the Graveyard. When this card is destroyed by this effect and sent to the Graveyard, your opponent shuffles all cards in their Graveyard into the Deck.

[Althemia]

It's a -1 that's too predictable and is going to be dead more often than not. What's to discuss? s:

[Dova]

I've found it to be somewhat useful as a side card, mostly as setting it for the opponent to kill. Yes, while other cards have shown that's not good on its own, this card not only has some use when it is activated, but can be a target for your twin twister as a last resort.

I mean, it is meh, but it has use. The surprise factor does help, as you said, and it's not always useful, but I hadn't seen it before, and there are people more familiar with the meta than me.

[Althemia]

If you're going to use Twin Twister as an argument where a -3 is your only way of stopping your opponent I'd say that's pretty naff all things considered really.

[ÆƵ–]

Dova hunny I hope you know this only goes off when it blows itself up

[~~~~]

When this card is destroyed by this effect

Why are we discussing TwiTwi?

 

Damn it, ninja'd

[Dova]

Well, great. Always read cards Dova, always read cards.

[Expelsword]

I'm very surprised I've never seen this before, it's a tremendous side against Infernoids, and could really hurt BA (Dante and Cir)

[The Nyx Avatar]

Against Pendulum, sure; you could use this. But regardless, why would you play it? You gain nothing from it, and more often than not, you'd be helping your opponent.

[Althemia]

Against Pendulum, sure; you could use this. But regardless, why would you play it? You gain nothing from it, and more often than not, you'd be helping your opponent.

Wait, why is this good against Pendulums?

[The Nyx Avatar]

Wait, why is this good against Pendulums?

I never said that; I said you could use it against Pendulum.

[Althemia]

I never said that; I said you could use it against Pendulum.

I'm really confused as to your thinking now. Can you explain? o O;;

[Tinkerer]

Would totally be better as a continuous trap.

 

...never thought I'd say that.

[The Nyx Avatar]

I'm really confused as to your thinking now. Can you explain? o O;;

What I meant is that you could use this against Pendulum, as they don't typically mess with the Graveyard. But I followed it up with "regardless, you wouldn't want to ise it" or something among those lines.

[IQuitDolphin]

Stop trying to defend a card that is obviously bad with an obviously bad interaction. I learned it the hard way, you should to: funk Disclaimers, they don't matter.

[Tinkerer]

What I meant is that you could use this against Pendulum, as they don't typically mess with the Graveyard. But I followed it up with "regardless, you wouldn't want to ise it" or something among those lines.

...I'm still not sure I follow. What you're saying is basically the equivalent of "Kozmo don't typically tribute summon. Let's put in Mask of Restruct!". This card wants your opponent to interact with their graveyard.

[Kanashimi]

What Nyx want to say is, yes you can use this card against pendulums, but you gain nothing from it nor it stop pends from doing something, instead they (opp who uses pendulums) will be grateful since their grave is being recycled.

 

-Anyway-

 

Bad things about this card is Continu Spell, means TwiTwi/MST exist to negate.
Also i prefer this instead:
[spoiler= '']

But only works for monsters

 

 

 

Because it burns away their hope and grave, instead of recycling them. (but different if you want a grave-disruption that recycles.)

[Snatch Steal]

I literally pulled this card like a week ago. I knew it had to have some potential.

 

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

 

I don't know how amazing it is, but I think it could be good. It's a bit vulnerable to removal, and, yes, pretty predictable, but Kaiser Colosseum has a similar strategy, as far as I'm concerned.

[Progenitor]

How is this good in any way? It has to be destroyed by its own effect, and it's trigger is a condition you can't actually force upon your opponent, and all it does is reset the grave. Which means it's only ever remotely useful late game, against decks that are graveyard reliant in the first place.

 

Like it could be used against Shiranui/Zombie.dek. That's about it to be honest. Infernoids don't actually target the graveyard with anything for the most part so this is dead against them.

[Expelsword]

Infernoids don't actually target the graveyard with anything for the most part so this is dead against them.

 

???

[Tinkerer]

Infernoids don't actually target the graveyard with anything for the most part so this is dead against them.

This works on your opponent targeting cards in either graveyard. Don't Infernoids tribute to banish stuff in your grave?

[Progenitor]

This works on your opponent targeting cards in either graveyard. Don't Infernoids tribute to banish stuff in your grave?

Ahh I suppose that's true. That does mess with them quite a bit then. Didn't realize it was either graveyard

[IQuitDolphin]

Infernoids will rarely want to banish anything from your Grave regardless, since it isn't an essential interaction they need to do, and there is this thing called Seit and Patrulea. Technical play can play around this compared to every other established floodgate.