ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 clothing color? You can't judge vampires simply on that. It tells nothing of their personality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 It wasn't me who did it. Talk to Ninjakid >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 yeah well I'm waiting to see how Twilight portrayed them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I hate to say it' date=' but Twilight is the closest you can get to real vampires.[/quote'] VAMPIRES ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO funking SPARKLE. Go read Cirque Du Freak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 If vampires were real, they probably would be just normal people. And they probably wouldn't be pale as people say they are. Or, I guess not necessarily pale. The only reason vampires are supposed to be pale is because they're "undead". And if they were really "undead", then I guess they might be pale. But then they also defy what we know as biology, as well as many religions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 plus the fact I doubt any of them have any REAL shape shifting skills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obi-wan Cannoli Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 If vampires were real' date=' they probably would be just normal people. And they probably wouldn't be pale as people say they are. Or, I guess not [i']necessarily[/i] pale. The only reason vampires are supposed to be pale is because they're "undead". And if they were really "undead", then I guess they might be pale. But then they also defy what we know as biology. If they did exist, what we call biology would be thrown out the window. And you can't say that if they existed they would just be normal not undead people then they wouldn't exist. I'm not saying they do exist, but your really contradicting yourself there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I'm an Anne Rice fan and i want the vampires to be like she depicts them. The 3rd pic is the coolest. I'm a fan of Lestat (the 2nd pic vampire), but i dont vote for him because that actor sucks. Lestat looks better in the movie "The queen of the Damned", but that movie sucks (i have read the first three books and where a lot better than that movie) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 If vampires were real' date=' they probably would be just normal people. And they probably wouldn't be pale as people say they are. Or, I guess not [i']necessarily[/i] pale. The only reason vampires are supposed to be pale is because they're "undead". And if they were really "undead", then I guess they might be pale. But then they also defy what we know as biology. If they did exist, what we call biology would be thrown out the window. And you can't say that if they existed they would just be normal not undead people then they wouldn't exist. I'm not saying they do exist, but your really contradicting yourself there.I was putting up multiple theories. I said if they were undead how they would be, and if they weren't undead how they would be. I wasn't saying that they were and weren't undead at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obi-wan Cannoli Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 If vampires were real' date=' they probably would be just normal people. And they probably wouldn't be pale as people say they are. Or, I guess not [i']necessarily[/i] pale. The only reason vampires are supposed to be pale is because they're "undead". And if they were really "undead", then I guess they might be pale. But then they also defy what we know as biology. If they did exist, what we call biology would be thrown out the window. And you can't say that if they existed they would just be normal not undead people then they wouldn't exist. I'm not saying they do exist, but your really contradicting yourself there.I was putting up multiple theories. I said if they were undead how they would be, and if they weren't undead how they would be. I wasn't saying that they were and weren't undead at the same time. If there not undead and such, there pretty much not vampires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I'm an Anne Rice fan and i want the vampires to be like she depicts them. The 3rd pic is the coolest. I'm a fan of Lestat (the 2nd pic vampire)' date=' but i dont vote for him because that actor sucks. Lestat looks better in the movie "The queen of the Damned", but that movie sucks (i have read the first three books and where a lot better than that movie)[/quote'] Queen of the Damned was a terrible movie, and I don't think they portrayed vampires right at all in there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I know. The movie was HORRIBLE and TERRIBLE. The books is where the good stuff is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benraino Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Vampires don't exist, in real life. /thread. PS. Vampires shouldn't sparkle. Thats a three letter word that would get me in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I would that stereotyping those poor creatures ike that is dumb...the vampires might have integrated themselves into human society to better adapt to their current situations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I know. The movie was HORRIBLE and TERRIBLE. The books is where the good stuff is. Care to give some good vampire books then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I know. The movie was HORRIBLE and TERRIBLE. The books is where the good stuff is. Care to give some good vampire books then? The queen of the damned. The book is good. But first you need to read interview with the vampire and lestat the vampire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I didn't even know Queen of the Damned had been made into a book Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 The book is the original one, the movie was just a bad idea of someone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Same with other vampire movies, ripped off from books/comics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted November 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Well....*sigh* don't even get me started. "To fully know a vampire' date=' you must know one first" Vampires don't look anything like that. They are pale, but not completely white. They have fangs, but not so long or sharp, they are just very small, some vampires don't even have fangs. They like wearing black clothing, but they aren't gothic looking at all. They have rings of black around their eyes and thats what makes them different then humans though. Their eyes are full of pain, and if you comare them to human eyes, they are excteremly different. Vampire look EXACTLY like humans. They are NORMAL beings. They just are a bit more pail, have sharper teeth, and like I said, their eyes are the main difference between humans. None of those pictures are at all like vampires. I'm sorry, but I get fairly annoyed about things like this. "To understand a vampire, you have to know one first" The Crimson One,Miranda-chan[/quote'] I'm aware that most of the representations that I have posted aren't very realistic at all, I just wanted to look at the ways in which some people view them, because I personally find it very sad how they are stereotyped like this. I'm a big vampire fan myself.. You didn't like interview with the vampire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 one of the few vampire movies I have yet to watch is 30 Days of Night, nor have I read the book. Is it good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 one of the few vampire movies I have yet to watch is 30 Days of Night' date=' nor have I read the book. Is it good?[/quote'] No, I thought it was terrible. @Ninjakid1: Vampires don't exist anyway, so your rant is pretty much pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted November 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 one of the few vampire movies I have yet to watch is 30 Days of Night' date=' nor have I read the book. Is it good?[/quote'] No, I thought it was terrible. @Ninjakid1: Vampires don't exist anyway, so your rant is pretty much pointless. -bares fangs- Say what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 one of the few vampire movies I have yet to watch is 30 Days of Night' date=' nor have I read the book. Is it good?[/quote'] No, I thought it was terrible. @Ninjakid1: Vampires don't exist anyway, so your rant is pretty much pointless. I was referring to both the film AND the book Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakura Vessal Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 one of the few vampire movies I have yet to watch is 30 Days of Night' date=' nor have I read the book. Is it good?[/quote'] No, I thought it was terrible. @Ninjakid1: Vampires don't exist anyway, so your rant is pretty much pointless. Neither does god, people still rant bout him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.