Jump to content

The Necloth of Decisive Armor


Recommended Posts

i.imgur.com/HX2G2rp.jpg
Decisive no Necloth / The Necloth of Decisive Armor
Level 10 WATER Dragon-Type Ritual Effect Monster
ATK 3300
DEF 2300
You can Ritual Summon this card with any “Necloth” Ritual Spell Card. Must be Ritual Summoned by using non-Level 10 monsters, and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways. You can only use each effect of “The Necloth of Decisive Armor” once per turn.
(1) During either player’s turn: You can discard this card, then target 1 “Necloth” monster you control; it gains 1000 ATK and DEF until the end of the turn.
(2) You can target 1 Set card your opponent controls; destroy it, and if you do, banish it.

There is art, but it's upside down and I'm on phone. Needless to say, it's the "fish man".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would have betted that the 10 was going to be Leviathan, but this is fine too, looks really awsome.

 

Second effect is pretty good. First one..., ehhh, not so much.

 

I guess we can stop expecting Ritual Necloths after this one? At least "regular" ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A themed Honest. I like it, personally, but I'm not sure if they really need it /that/ much, especially with their field removal effects. As for the second effect, it's neat. Practically Shaddoll hate. But it's a Level 10, 3300 beater, so it can get over stuff like Killer. The fact that it's a Dragon threw me off too, but I guess that was to be expected from Catastor and the Dragunity Spear. This fishman likes his Ally of Justices. 
But dat art tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artwork looks awesome.

 

I find funny that the first effect is the 1000 ATK boost that Koko called on Claousolas. It does make sense, though: lower Necloth Rituals have consistency effects, and the higher levels have protection or battle effects.

 

Second effect is backrow and Shadoll removal. I also wish it directly banished instead, but it is good enough.

 

Interestingly, apparently this is Dragon-Type, instead of Warrior or Spellcaster. This makes me think that Banjo/Black may be right on the "fishman" being actually a dragon, possibly from Dragunities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we need 1 2 11 and 12

 

Well, for 2, I can think of some. But I hope it's Neo Flamvell Origin, since it was infected by the Lswarm. Probably not, since it's hard to reflect its effect with a Ritual. 

 

Interestingly, apparently this is Dragon-Type, instead of Warrior or Spellcaster. This makes me think that Banjo/Black may be right on the "fishman" being actually a dragon, possibly from Dragunities.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if the "fishman" monster searched the Dragon-Type Ritual monsters like how Sorcerer and Shrit search Spellcasters and Warriors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So beautiful...

Anyways, I wonder if they made catastor and decisive dragons to allow them to be searchable by Tidal...

 

Had not thought about this. Now Necloths can tech Gold Sarc to either banish Tidal or Necloth Sorc to trigger their effects, or at worst get whatever they want or need in the next 2 turns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I think about it...

Konami please we need a Hieratic Synchro

;)

How is this relevant at all.

I literally see nothing being relevant.

 

While that first effect is cool, I personally like the second effect the most.

That form of removal is pretty cool, but the fact that it still has to destroy is a tad bit…meh. Granted, it serves to balance it, in a way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think there's actually any relevant cards today that will trigger off only by being destroyed (and not sent to graveyard) aside from the Artifact S/Ts.

 

While the destroy part seems unnecessary compared to straight-up banishing, it definitely doesn't seem that it'll hamper this card's performance much. (also not sure, but can the 'destroy, and if you do, banish' part makes card effects miss their timing?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBF, the fact that it destroys first makes it better design than if it straight-up banished.

 

It makes it extremely powerful removal (in theory) that can still be countered realistically.

 

More cards that banish should destroy first, because it reigns in extremely powerful removal to a degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I randomly thought about this last night:

- Decisive Armor was designed to fight LIGHT monsters.

- Necloths brought it back as an armor.

 

So could this new generation of DT tribes be threatened by a LIGHT archetype? After all, a timeskip occurred and we don't know yet what happened to Shaddolls, Tellarknights, etc. or if they are still around; plus the almost mandatory LIGHT and DARK archetypes of the new generation have not been introduced yet, so the former could actually be the bad guys, just like Worms and Fableds in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...