Unpopular Opinions

[Tentacruel]

Oatmeal raisin cookies are superior to chocolate chip. 

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

Redundancies aside, I think what Ali is trying to say is thus: Humans by nature cannot be hypocritical if they believe themselves to be true.

I think what Icyblue is trying to do is twist Ali's words to Socratic hooey. 

[Forest Fire]

I think what Icyblue is trying to do is twist Ali's words to Socratic hooey. 

Or it could just be how he views Ali's words. Not everyone interprets things the same way. 

 

 

<sarcasm>Nah he's definitely doing it on purpose to fuck with us, amiright?</sarcasm>

[Susie]

Oatmeal raisin cookies are superior to chocolate chip.

subtract those gross raisins and ill agree

[Ultradragon16]

I actually like Sonic 06 and Zexal

[Cosmo.]

Fairy's Arent Real

You just killed bajillion of fairies with that HUGE statement!
You should feel ashamed, fantastic creatures murderer! XD

[Shradow]

Die Hard is not a Christmas movie.

[Forest Fire]

I play with lands in front for MtG.

 i'm not the only one who does this? o.O good to know. 

 

unrelated: i like going to school. 
 

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

Hypocrisy is a necessary evil for raising children and keeping the plebs in check, among other things. 

 

Or it could just be how he views Ali's words. Not everyone interprets things the same way.

 

Myself included, and I'll be taking this here confession of yours of mass-murder straight to tha po-lice.

[Forest Fire]

I'll be taking this here confession of yours of mass-murder straight to tha po-lice.

o.O  whaaaaaa

[Zauls]

I'm not sure how popular this is as an opinion, but despite being against drug use, I think that all drugs should be legalised.

 

There should be no age of consent. Again, not sure how popular this opinion is, though I'm sure a lot of people will probably agree.

 

We should replace cows with kangaroos.

 

Legs are the most attractive part of a woman, followed by eyes and arse, though it does depend on the individual woman in question. Boobs are only mildly attractive.

[Resident Fascist]

I'm not sure how popular this is as an opinion, but despite being against drug use, I think that all drugs should be legalised.

 

Legs are the most attractive part of a woman, followed by eyes and arse, though it does depend on the individual woman in question. Boobs are only mildly attractive.

 

I agree with many drugs being legalized, so long as the consumer knows what they are taking and the possible side effects. I also agree with legalizing guns for the same reason, if people are educated well on gun safety it would not cause any more crime than it does now, major criminals will get guns anyway, and banning guns assumes that every civilian is a criminal and has ill intent for owning a gun. Granted the fact I am a bit of a gun junkie and I am sad it would be nigh impossible for me to get a firearms license in my country.

 

Ass is the best thing on a woman, then boobs, then her face. Glad to see another guy who favours butt over tits though.

[LordCowCowCowCowCowCowCowCow]

There should be no age of consent. Again, not sure how popular this opinion is, though I'm sure a lot of people will probably agree.

 

We should replace cows with kangaroos.

Well, the first one there. That's more so that people can't take advantage of young people.....so no to that, really.

 

BUT THAT SECOND ONE YOU HAVE CROSSED THE LINE GOOD SIR

 

sorry I had to

[CLG Klavier]

Unpopular opinion?

 

YGO is a pretty damn good game if you ask me :v

[Forest Fire]

I agree with many drugs being legalized, so long as the consumer knows what they are taking and the possible side effects. I also agree with legalizing guns for the same reason, if people are educated well on gun safety it would not cause any more crime than it does now, major criminals will get guns anyway, and banning guns assumes that every civilian is a criminal and has ill intent for owning a gun. Granted the fact I am a bit of a gun junkie and I am sad it would be nigh impossible for me to get a firearms license in my country.
 
Ass is the best thing on a woman, then boobs, then her face. Glad to see another guy who favours butt over tits though.

I agree with you about the drugs and guns stuff, actually. I do not own a gun (no duh I'm 15), but still.. 

I always look at the face first. If a woman has a bitch face.... yeah... no. Face, legs, boobs, then butt. 
 

There should be no age of consent. Again, not sure how popular this opinion is, though I'm sure a lot of people will probably agree.

No. Just no dude.

[Cierfrost]

There should be no age of consent. Again, not sure how popular this opinion is, though I'm sure a lot of people will probably agree.

 

You're going to have to elaborate buddy. Otherwise you come off as a criminal.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

 

 

Legs are the most attractive part of a woman, followed by eyes and arse, though it does depend on the individual woman in question. Boobs are only mildly attractive.

I'd say ass and then legs, but yeah, that typical gist.

Boobs aren't that attractive to me, but they're not exactly non existent(though lolis are nice *shot*). Guess it depends on the boobs.

[Tentacruel]

There should be no age of consent. Again, not sure how popular this opinion is, though I'm sure a lot of people will probably agree.

I agree that age of consent should not be seen as the moral absolute it is, but dude, no age of consent includes like, five year olds.

 

You have to draw a line somewhere. 

[Agro]

I think the age of consent being around 16-18 makes sense.

 

Sex ed should normally start around 12-13 (if not earlier), giving a few years for teenagers to understand what exactly intercourse is and the certain consequences. (show someone a video of a child being born with a mother choosing not to use painkillers and see how ready they are to have sex, lol)

 

Two consenting 14 year olds doesn't really bother me, but I definitely think restrictions on age difference for consent is something to consider.

 

I'd say there's a big difference between 2 14 year olds exploring themselves and a 14 year old and 18 year old, or even 17 y.o.

 

 

As for the other conversation about what you find attractive in someone, for me it comes down to the eyes, hair, lips, and waist. (but really all of that doesn't matter if I cant make someone laugh by being in their presence)

[Forest Fire]

I think the age of consent being around 16-18 makes sense.

 

Sex ed should normally start around 12-13 (if not earlier), giving a few years for teenagers to understand what exactly intercourse is and the certain consequences. (show someone a video of a child being born with a mother choosing not to use painkillers and see how ready they are to have sex, lol)

 

Two consenting 14 year olds doesn't really bother me, but I definitely think restrictions on age difference for consent is something to consider.

 

I'd say there's a big difference between 2 14 year olds exploring themselves and a 14 year old and 18 year old, or even 17 y.o.

 

 

As for the other conversation about what you find attractive in someone, for me it comes down to the eyes, hair, lips, and waist. (but really all of that doesn't matter if I cant make someone laugh by being in their presence)

so by that logic i can fuck a consenting 14-16 year old? kk. 

 

being serious now. yeah, i totally agree with like everything you said.

 

eyes and lips do affect it, waist is eh.

[Blake]

Eyes > all

Eyes draw my attention the most, and my wife has the most gorgeous eyes <3

[Forest Fire]

aww Robin that's so sweet. 

 

unrelated: may or may not be unpopular, but fuck it: black people shouldn't be a allowed to use the word nigger if white people aren't. just because their ancestors suffered an injustice doesn't mean they should be treated differently or given different rights. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_{i think i just killed myself}

[Agro]

unrelated: may or may not be unpopular, but fuck it: black people shouldn't be a allowed to use the word nigger if white people aren't. just because their ancestors suffered an injustice doesn't mean they should be treated differently or given different rights. 
 
_{i think i just killed myself}

I'd think it's a valid argument that if you're black, you shouldn't use the n word, but arguing that they shouldn't use it BECAUSE white people "aren't allowed" sounds kind of dumb.
 
Keep in mind that you're allowed to say the n word all you want. But it carries more connotations because its a word that means "slave" if not worse. In the black community, it's a way of connecting with others in your oppressed group, much in the way "Yankee" started out as an insult and became a unifying term. Except unlike "Yankee," the n word carries the weight of centuries of racism and injustice that still lingers in our culture today. You can say it all you want, but you do have to accept the weight of the social consequences.
 
Also, the "injustices" only being attributed to ancestors seems pretty ignorant considering recent race relations.

[Zauls]

OK, I'll elaborate on the age of consent one so as I don't sound like a paedophile.

Similar to having a legal drinking age, the age of consent just assumes outright that turning 16 (or whatever age it is in your country) suddenly means that you're mature enough to be able to make the right decisions about sex. People mature at extremely different rates, physically and mentally, and to say that they are all ready at the exact same age is ridiculous.

In the UK in particular, people don't want to talk about sex in an open and mature manner. Its just seen as dirty bad behaviour. Sex is not a bad thing at all but because we retain old fashioned views about it then its still seen as such, at least until you're either 16 years of age or married, depending on individuals' opinions. If I told my mum that I lost my virginity at 17 outside of marriage, she'd probably be horrified and view me as indecent.

This bad attitude towards sex and the inability to discuss it means young people are much less informed about it than they should be, meaning they are more likely to make bad decisions. Its a very similar situation with attitudes towards alcohol in the UK/USA compared to Europe. In Europe, young people are introduced to alcohol at a much younger age, but usually in a civilised family environment and parents can guide their children through this process of socialisation. This leads to less alcohol misuse in adulthood. The opposite is true here in the UK. Because many children are told that alcohol is bad and they shouldn't go near it, a rebellious attitude is created during teenage years which leads to more misuse. The age of consent just contributes towards the alienation of young adolescents from sex.

As far as the abuse thing is concerned, it needs to be viewed case by case, but I will say this: A 16-17 year old having a relationship with a 15 year old is currently against the law and is seen as abuse on the older one's part. If they are in a happy consensual relationship and they are both mature enough to make informed decisions, what the hell is wrong with that? Its the same if two 15 year olds are in a relationship, there's just nothing wrong with it at all. It is wrong when people, no matter what age, are taking advantage of the misinformed young people and abusing them. More education and a better legal attitude would help reduce this problem. Also, an older person abusing a 16+ year old is just as bad as an older person abusing a 12 year old. Abuse is abuse and whether they are of legal age or not does not make it any better.

In addition:

It has been observed that countries with lower ages of consent see lower rates of teenage pregnancy because the attitude, socially and legally, is more open. We shouldn't be criminalising two young people in a sexual relationship, we should be informing them and encouraging the practice of safe sex.

The age of consent is outdated and contradictory to other policies, too: In the UK, under 16s have free access to contraception, which I think is a good thing. Why are we then legally viewing them as criminals?

 

So now hopefully you see where I'm coming from and I hope you don't think I'm a paedophile. A lot of you will probably disagree with me, but this thread is called "unpopular opinions" so that's kind of expected.

[Forest Fire]

I'd think it's a valid argument that if you're black, you shouldn't use the n word, but arguing that they shouldn't use it BECAUSE white people "aren't allowed" sounds kind of dumb.
 
Keep in mind that you're allowed to say the n word all you want. But it carries more connotations because its a word that means "slave" if not worse. In the black community, it's a way of connecting with others in your oppressed group, much in the way "Yankee" started out as an insult and became a unifying term. Except unlike "Yankee," the n word carries the weight of centuries of racism and injustice that still lingers in our culture today. You can say it all you want, but you do have to accept the weight of the social consequences.
 
Also, the "injustices" only being attributed to ancestors seems pretty ignorant considering recent race relations.

I'm saying that it's more socially acceptable for a black person to say nigger than for a white person to. Only I was to tired to phrase it right. 
Racism has existed, will exist and does exist. my point is really that it shouldn't be more socially acceptable for a black person to say nigger than for a white person. But it is. Racism shouldn't exist, but it does.