Jump to content

[CORE] Igknight


Recommended Posts

1. Um.. How?        (Pendulum Summon or Tribute Summon, then pop your own cards to generate advantage, thought not ideal)

2. No.                      (Obviously a joke, after all I mentioned it just because I could)

3. Maybe                 (Better not, with all the searching and thus thinning one reduces the chance of a success and waiting more than 1-2 turns is way too much)

4. No.                      ( Technically it could be worth it)

5. No.                      (They generate much advantage and much tribute fodder, so the nuke effect is not too hard to accomplish, however fiendish chain hurts like crazy with him)

6. Maybe? Regular Poly still seems better, especially when the deck can Nova Master as well off of a normal summon Blazeman         (well it prevents your opponent from simply destroying first of dragons, as you could get a free draw for it)

7. No. You need your pendulum s*** to search and set up plays. Destroying them isn't going to help you. Even if you do get a draw out of it.       (except for the fact that those destroyed are afterwards replaced with new cards and the decks is consistent enough to allow replacements via drawing)

8.  Why the f*** is this a suggestion? (similar to  2.)

9. No. It looks good in theory, but being a beast-warriors hurts. Tenki can remedy but Beast-Warriors don't synergize with the deck, a Bear engine can be implemented though if absolutely needed. (being forced to battle with these is indeed not an ideal idea)

10. Already been established. (true)

 

tl;dr: You are severely overthinking things, and trying to apply scrub logic. Stop trying.

... I am simply presenting points to discuss (thought I mentioned a few which were obviously not useful) however is this not the point of a discussion to ... hmm how was that again ... oh yea ... discuss possible techs ?

To make sure one does not forget possibilities one should look at as many as possible, unless a discussion is obsolete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Pros of purely archetype based stuff; It typically sticks to a set formula.
Cons of purely archetype based stuff; It's only capable of said set formula.

Pros of generic/archetype based stuff; It's more open to experimentation and offers more variety.
Cons of generic/archetype based stuff; The win-con is often too vague, and you have to make up everything; The netdecker's worst nightmare.

*ahem*

Personally, I'm more for the later BECAUSE after you trim the fat, you typically get a much better deck in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cons of generic/archetype based stuff; The netdecker's worst nightmare.
 

I would count that as positive argument, it should not always be "hey put this here and this here because the same name is slapped all over these cards and all other prevent you from using them" and it should also not be

"copy and paste the decklist, the playstyle is linear, good luck playing the same deck more multiple months in a row without even slight changes or a second playstyle".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually found a fun, albeit situational, synergy.

 

Field:

Elemental HERO Nova Master, Clear Wing Synchro Dragon, other shit for swinging

 

Nova Master punches something

Activates

Chain CWSD, pop Nova, get +2600 ATK (5100)

???

Go ham and OTK


Arc-V is in full force. Anything you can report about how the dech handles in general?

i just never changed the bg because it almost broken when i did qq

 

Basically, opening too many techs sucks, but you can go absolutely fucking ham with Infinity (90+% of hands) or Rhongo (if you can filter enough) on T1 to just shut them out and smack them around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...