Jump to content

Gaiasaber the Video Knight [COTD]


Recommended Posts

DeneinoKishiGaiasaber-COTD-JP-OP.png

Gaiasaber, the Video Knight
EARTH Machine-Type Link Monster
ATK 2600
LINK-3
Links: Left, Right, Down
Materials: 2 or more Monsters
 
Nothing too remarkable, and basically the Link equivalent of Gagagigo the Arisen. But those side-facing arrows and the ATK stat is... alright. Trivia moment though, we now have 4 different ED Gaia cards.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can't have Machine-Type rituals so they gave us these ;_;

 

Anyway, this card actually seems rather good, especially if they allow S/T zones to become Extra Monster Zones.

 

Summon it as your second Link Monster (below something cheap like the Spider thing) and you get to grab 2 (or 3 if they allow S/T zones) EM Zones for the low low price of any 3 monsters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, hold on:

If I have Spider in my Extra Deck Zone, and Summon a Normal Monster with its effect, and then I want to use both for this guy, can I summon it in the linked Main Monster Zone the Normal Monster is, or must it be placed in the Extra Deck Zone, or do I get to choose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, hold on:

If I have Spider in my Extra Deck Zone, and Summon a Normal Monster with its effect, and then I want to use both for this guy, can I summon it in the linked Main Monster Zone the Normal Monster is, or must it be placed in the Extra Deck Zone, or do I get to choose?

 

You would have to summon Gaia to your EM Zone if you're using Link Spider as a material, but you'd also need 2 other monsters as Gaia is a LINK-3, and so you need to fulfill that 3-mat requirement alongside its required materials because Spider is only LINK-1, and thus only counts as 1 material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would have to summon Gaia to your EM Zone if you're using Link Spider as a material, but you'd also need 2 other monsters as Gaia is a LINK-3, and so you need to fulfill that 3-mat requirement alongside its required materials because Spider is only LINK-1, and thus only counts as 1 material.

 

Right, materials should match the Link number; was misled by the "2 or more" material requirement. And using the Spider will force it to go the the Extra Monster Zone, that's a bummer; I was hoping to be able to put it on the Main Monster Zone to use those left&right links.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's some nice card art right there. Opening up as many as three zones for the cost of an average tribute summon ain't bad either.

 

One thing though, as those side links point directly left and right, instead of diagonally backwards, I assume it only gives you the full 3 slots if you summon it into a main slot, not the extra one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's some nice card art right there. Opening up as many as three zones for the cost of an average tribute summon ain't bad either.

 

One thing though, as those side links point directly left and right, instead of diagonally backwards, I assume it only gives you the full 3 slots if you summon it into a main slot, not the extra one?

Well, we don't know if links will be able to expand into Spell/Trap Zones. As of what we are sure about right now, this guy will only be able to link up 2 Zones at most (in a Main Monster Zone).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems pretty obvious to me that some Link Monsters will be better played in the EMZ and some (like this) will be better in the MMZ, depending on the direction of the links. This obviously won't be played apart from maybe really early on, but it does enable you to have up to 4 ED monsters on the field (itself, the thing in the EMZ and the linked zones next to this) which I don't think anything else does that we've seen so far (correct me if I'm wrong). Cards with left-right links will be the spam enablers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems pretty obvious to me that some Link Monsters will be better played in the EMZ and some (like this) will be better in the MMZ, depending on the direction of the links. This obviously won't be played apart from maybe really early on, but it does enable you to have up to 4 ED monsters on the field (itself, the thing in the EMZ and the linked zones next to this) which I don't think anything else does that we've seen so far (correct me if I'm wrong). Cards with left-right links will be the spam enablers.

 

Honeybot also has Link Markers to the left and right, so it's better to place it in a MMZ, too. It is Link2, but requires 2 Cybers monsters so it is not as splashable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understand the materials, it's kinda like Synchro Summon. Stardust Dragon requires 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuners whose total Levels equal 8. This card requires 2 or more monsters whose total Link Number equals 3. The only difference is that monsters without a Link Number are treated as having a Link Number of 1 for the purpose of summoning a Link Monster, which is very different from how Levels worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understand the materials, it's kinda like Synchro Summon. Stardust Dragon requires 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuners whose total Levels equal 8. This card requires 2 or more monsters whose total Link Number equals 3. The only difference is that monsters without a Link Number are treated as having a Link Number of 1 for the purpose of summoning a Link Monster, which is very different from how Levels worked.

you dont need link monsters, you could just use 2 monsters, or 1 link 3 monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swear to Bishbaalkin if they use this card as a cap on further design

Link 3 is bad for non-effect, and the Link Markers they gave it mean it's going to be outclassed for Link Monsters that specialize in enabling in the Extra Zone (S + SW/SE) or for Link Monsters with actual effects that specialize in enabling in the Main Zone (E + W).

2.6k is also awfully low for something that would usually require 3 materials :T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swear to Bishbaalkin if they use this card as a cap on further design

Link 3 is bad for non-effect, and the Link Markers they gave it mean it's going to be outclassed for Link Monsters that specialize in enabling in the Extra Zone (S + SW/SE) or for Link Monsters with actual effects that specialize in enabling in the Main Zone (E + W).

2.6k is also awfully low for something that would usually require 3 materials :T

 

I agree with this. 2600 ATK for a 3-material non-Effect Link Monster doesn't look good, and it better doesn't become the ATK threshold for Link 3 monsters. I would have preferred for it to require 2 materials instead, more in parallel with "Gaia Knight, the Force of Earth" and Gem-Knight Pearl.

Still, it appears they don't want to start with Link Monsters with too high ATK values. The current 2-material Link2s don't go over 1900 ATK, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this. 2600 ATK for a 3-material non-Effect Link Monster doesn't look good, and it better doesn't become the ATK threshold for Link 3 monsters. I would have preferred for it to require 2 materials instead, more in parallel with "Gaia Knight, the Force of Earth" and Gem-Knight Pearl.

Still, it appears they don't want to start with Link Monsters with too high ATK values. The current 2-material Link2s don't go over 1900 ATK, for example.

That's probably also early-mechanic caution (throwback to 2.5k being rank 4 or lower cap for Positive Effect XYZs, and that one had a drawback anyways AND was the ace monster)

Link Spooder is cool but yea, really hoping they branch out

Also I suspect Cybers got juked a bit for being focused on in the Early Wave, which is another reason I dislike the new Type. At any other time they could just build a regular support base but since it's occurring at the same time as a new mechanic, their hastily-crafted support base is also going to be the Early Wave, which means that their support base is fated to get creeped out :T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...