I Hate Snatch Steal

What?

OH I get it Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Very Funny joke Kitkalos case Kolas is a Pokemon region Teralaments have some explaining to do... lol XD lamo

As a yugioh and pokemon fan I approve

BUT what does pot of greed do? No one is full certain. Top leading scientists have their theories.

umm so it's like YGOPro but for custom cards, and it isn't "free for all" but whatever one creates has to interact with the pre-existing custom card pool, am I correct?

I think so

That's similar to Vanguard's PSYQualia. Sure you can get a vision of what'll happen at a later point in a game, but that doesn't mean it'll pan out every time (as was explained during Season 2).

I've had LASIK and thus I no longer need glasses. I highly recommend it and if you have any questions feel free to PM me.

Maybe he's one of those off people who wear reading glasses just for the look?

I have had glasses so for long I feel like it would just be weird to have that change. Also, it's a bit too expensive for me.

I mean, we can compare police to war, that again is a terrible argument when the consideration is to have better weapons than the opponent instead of the necessary equipment to de-esculate. It is, again, an argument in favor of reactionary states since the war bias is to not only be more prepared than the enemy but to also have the bigger weapon. Police, fundamentally, should not be about "warring" the situation but resolving it and presenting a form of de-esculation so that the situation is lessened.

And, again, you seem to be using hypotheticals to present an argument that radically dismisses the place and point of "defunding the police". Police are notable not about fighting for the direct laws and policies, but for the basis at which that law upholds standards. There is no proper treatment of knowing the law in which people engage in, only the rights that need to be presented so that a lawful case can be warranted. Police training does not provide the "gear" necessary to construct objective claims that forgo their own biases, as it does not provide proper knowledge toward the system they are said to protect. Rather, the safety nets are there to allow officers to forgo such knowledge and act toward their bias. The "gear" they have are weapons that provide resentment rather than resolution.

It is also evident that police are not for the safety of the individuals but the safety of the whole, which again stems to be a problem, because it means that their is bias to protecting themselves in place of threat. And we "regard" officers who do their job as heroes, when they put their life on the line in places of radical violence even when that is the base of what an officer is to do.

Now, if we're looking at it particularly from your hypothetical that still reduces the nuances to none and overlook my arguments: I am still not positing the idea of a limit on police and patrol. Rather, the amount of "specialized" officers is a higher capacity than the "patrolling" officers, while the changes in roles does not require a change in training, only a change in application of training. That is, also, another place where funds are underutilized and the "gear" is mishandled.

I really do not know what narrative you're trying to provide. It seems that you're really not looking at reality around the systems and situations enough to even have perspective on them, and these hypotheticals provide an illusion of belief for the necessity of service of governance instead of the models of governance that exist. This is all fun and games; if I really wanted to discuss this with you, I feel like you need to do a lot more to get your head out of your ass and realize what is happening here instead of just react to it. Your hypothetical position really show how much you need to dumb things down to realize what is going on and it is becoming a waste of time to repeat myself.

I see your point. And it may be near impossible to weed out every dirty cop because as it goes with police/military alike, those characteristics only start to surface when they gain higher ranks. The proof is in the pudding. But another fact that was displayed in the case of George Floyd is how a higher ranking officer is able manipulate the lower ranking officers and drag them down with him. The two officers that aided in the murder of Floyd had just received their badges. That one mistake both destroyed their careers and lives. So that goes to show that it takes more than "doing your job" to be a good cop. Kinda like how sometimes, to be a good soldier, you have to disobey orders that go against what you were taught or don't sit well with your moral code.

Many businesses and communities were destroyed. Many residents started to realized that this very destructive behavior is not productive to those businesses owners and citizens within those communities. Destroyed businesses and ransacked shopping centers does not equal to good local economy. Tax payers have to pay to fix alot of which is destroyed. Stores getting robbed blind means that the stores will have spend money to replace everything. All that destruction did no one ant good.

To be fair, I have won games with Blue-Eyes and I have won games with Kuriboh. Yet, I've never won a game with Exodia. So.... maybe the strategies that I used when I won were more viable than depending on getting Exodia to my hand over the course of a game.

I do not like the road, the game is heading towards... Konami literally painted themselves in a corner. Limiting how things are done within the game is also mind numbing and infuriatingly stupid.

Thank you very much, I appreciate the compliment and support.

The deck will be used in this custom card dueling community: